Southern California -- this just in

« Previous Post | L.A. NOW Home | Next Post »

Is L.A. housing density decision the revenge of Jane Usher?

To planning nerds, a court ruling that struck down a new housing density law in Los Angeles Tuesday was a small earthquake, throwing into question the legality of an unknown number of real estate projects approved by the City Council over the last year.

But political types had another urgent question about the decision: Is it the revenge of Jane Usher?

“Yes it is,” said Usher, who until November served as Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa’s top appointee on the city Planning Commission. Usher was deeply unhappy last year with the City Council’s plan for giving real estate developers new concessions – taller buildings, less open space, more housing units – for any project that had even a small amount of affordable housing. While serving as planning commission president, the normally soft-spoken Usher took the unusual step of sending an e-mail to neighborhood activists spelling out the various ways in which they could challenge the law in court.

Usher said the city had failed to provide the legally required environmental review of the so-called “density bonus” law. And she warned that the new ordinance would actually reduce the amount of affordable housing in Los Angeles by spurring the widespread demolition of rent-controlled apartments that would be replaced by expensive condominiums and apartments with as few as one or two units of affordable housing.

Neighborhood groups seized on the advice and sued, securing a legal ruling against the density bonus law. Superior Court Judge Thomas I. McKnew also invalidated the city’s approval of any real estate project that received concessions from Los Angeles that went beyond those that could be offered under a similar state law. This morning, Usher compared the density bonus law to Measure B, the solar energy plan that was defeated in the March 3 election, saying both were insufficiently vetted before they were approved by the council.

“In both cases," she said, "the process was short circuited.”

-- David Zahniser

Comments () | Archives (3)

This is great news. Thank you Ms. Usher for your invaluable service on making our city accountable to its citizens.

Quite simply, the City can grow upward or outward. The Density Bonus makes sense in many ways, but most importantly it allows for smart growth along transit corridors. Once again NIMBYs will ruin good planning for inevitable future growth. Construction is also a huge part of the economy. It's no wonder that we have an 11% unemployment rate. Stop development and it will soon be 15%.

Every Stakeholder/Activist/thoughtful citizen of the City of L.A.
should thank Ms Usher for having been, earlier on, a "Sacrificial Lamb" because of the Density Bonus madness. Those of us who have been in the struggle {almost from "Day One"} fighting for some sanity on the "Godfather SB1818" issue give her a big "shout out.! For those of you who don't understand what a victory this is for communities, you need to do a little research on your own! Thank you, Ms Usher.


Recommended on Facebook


In Case You Missed It...


About L.A. Now
L.A. Now is the Los Angeles Times’ breaking news section for Southern California. It is produced by more than 80 reporters and editors in The Times’ Metro section, reporting from the paper’s downtown Los Angeles headquarters as well as bureaus in Costa Mesa, Long Beach, San Diego, San Francisco, Sacramento, Riverside, Ventura and West Los Angeles.
Have a story tip for L.A. Now?
Can I call someone with news?
Yes. The city desk number is (213) 237-7847.


Get Alerts on Your Mobile Phone

Sign me up for the following lists: