Shhhh ... I'm taking your wallet
If even for an hour or two, the Richard J. Riordan Central Library downtown has always been a great place to trade in the hectic pace of the outside world for the slower, more civilized world of books and ideas.
But Los Angeles Police say the crown jewel of the city's library system recently earned a dubious distinction: It had more thefts last year of personal property -- excluding shoplifting -- than any location in the downtown area.
LAPD Lt. Paul Vernon said there were 31 theft reports filed in 2008, including wallets and purses, followed bicycles, laptops and other electronic equipment. This year, there have been eight reported thefts -- four for bicycles versus three bikes for the entirety of 2008 -- on pace to surpass last year's total.
To put it in perspective, the leading location for stolen items in the LAPD's Central Division was Macy's, with 94 shoplifting reports, all resulting in arrests. No arrests have been made in the library thefts this year or last, Vernon said.
"Part of the message is that people need to be more aware of their surroundings and not to be naive to crime," Vernon said. "It's easy to get lost in thought at the library and leave your belongings behind. What people don't realize, there's someone watching and waiting for you to walk away."
Most of the thefts have been reported between noon and 6 p.m. and most likely involve habitual drug users looking for items that can easily be cashed in as a means of buying drugs. A favorite target for thieves is the history department in Lower Level 4.
Vernon said it's no surprise that thieves favor the area because it's "the most remote place in the library." Although the library has security cameras, Vernon said "they do not record and are rarely monitored." Police are working with the library to try to address the issue.
Gary Newton, chief of General Services' office of public safety, which is in charge of security at the library, said cameras are expensive to upgrade, and they are only one piece of an overall security strategy.
"Most of these thefts are crimes of opportunity," Newton said. "By educating those who patronize the library, we can substantially reduce these thefts."
He noted at least one security officer is monitoring the library cameras 24 hours a day. But given the size of the facility and security staffing, there are limits to the number of cameras that can be monitored at one time.
Library spokesman Peter V. Persic said today that the library faces challenges in monitoring a building that is half a million square feet and used by 7,000 people on a daily basis.
"I don't think there's another facility downtown -- or anywhere else in the city -- that is that large and has that many people coming through on a daily basis," Persic said. "We face the same challenges that every other public place faces. We are working with the office of public safety to remind patrons to keep a watch on their personal items."
-- Andrew Blankstein
Photo: LAPD officers outside the central library. Credit: Richard Hartog / Los Angeles Times



It is amazing how many people will put down their bags and walk away from them. I see people leave laptops on tables, plug their cell phones into a wall and go search for books, or leave their backpacks while they visit the restroom. Watch your stuff, people!
Posted by: h.w. | March 04, 2009 at 11:38 AM
What makes you think this is due to drug users? I work in a library that is experiencing a similar increase in thefts and we note that our thefts correspond with the economy. People are getting desperate!
Posted by: AJT | March 04, 2009 at 11:54 AM
This sums up government waste and our tax dollars at work: "Although the library has security cameras, Vernon said 'they do not record and are rarely monitored.' "
Posted by: PF | March 04, 2009 at 12:41 PM
This sums up government waste and our tax dollars at work: "Although the library has security cameras, Vernon said 'they do not record and are rarely monitored.' "
Posted by: PF | March 04, 2009 at 12:42 PM
WOW. I always though Downtown LA was safe. Hopefully, they clean up that area. The new LA. Live is going to bring a lot of people to the downtown area and it would not be cool to hear about this things happening in downtown LA or in the blue line.
Posted by: JJ | March 04, 2009 at 02:53 PM
Re: PF's comments: Of course, the private sector NEVER does anything foolish. But yes--of course-- the security cameras should be monitored and recorded. Do you have any suggestions about where the library will get the money to do this? Maybe AIG can spare a couple million to fund it.
Posted by: Dario | March 04, 2009 at 02:58 PM
I'm sorry, but I chalk this one up to "live and learn", not to "we don't spend enough money for security".
You wouldn't leave your stuff at a bus stop. Well, the library is public... so it's really no different than a bus stop. People just want to believe it is.
Posted by: eric | March 04, 2009 at 03:41 PM
maybe cops should focus on real crime like this rather than pulling people over on bicycles or jaywalking.
Posted by: regular citizen | March 04, 2009 at 04:07 PM
"WOW. I always though Downtown LA was safe. Hopefully, they clean up that area. The new LA. Live is going to bring a lot of people to the downtown area and it would not be cool to hear about this things happening in downtown LA or in the blue line."
Nuke your brain JJ
Posted by: OBSOLETE EARTH 09 | March 04, 2009 at 04:13 PM
I used to work at a popular library at UCLA. People who are victims of these crimes are naive or stupid enough to think that their unattended personal items would still be there upon returning from the bathroom, searching for books in the stacks, or most common, talking on their cell phones (after being told to take the conversation outside).
I doubt many of these crimes are strongarm robberies or ones where there is direct confrontation between victim and perp. Crime does suck, but make it harder to be a vicitm.
I'd rather have the money for cameras be invested in more books and other materials that make a library a center of knowledge instead of a center of surveillance.
Posted by: Jorge | March 04, 2009 at 06:14 PM
If LA thinks this library is a "crown jewel" then LA is really living in lalaland. Anywhere downtown is not safe in my opinion.
Posted by: Rev. Dave | March 04, 2009 at 06:56 PM
Was it really a good idea to announce to the public that the cameras only observe and don't record? This seems like a good time to practice security through obscurity.
Posted by: mike | March 04, 2009 at 07:00 PM