First of Nadya Suleman's octupets may be home today
Workers were completing various home improvement projects this morning at the house of octuplet mother Nadya Suleman, who said two of her eight babies will come home as early as today.
Social workers from Kaiser Permanente Medical Center toured the La Habra house earlier this week to determine whether the eight babies could live there. Officials at Kaiser, where the babies have been since their birth Jan. 26, said the babies should be going home but were not certain when.
Suleman spent the weekend purchasing items for the house. She also took her other children to nearby Knott's Berry Farm.
In a video posted on Radar Online, Suleman described where her 14 children would sleep. As she speaks, the walls of the empty house glitter with the camera flashes from the paparazzi stationed outside. Squinting in the glare, Suleman issued an apology to her new neighbors.
On Friday, vandals hit Suleman's home, littering toilet paper around the property. According to the Orange County Register, a cameraman from gossip site TMZ and a man working on the house cleaned up the mess, and no arrests have been made.
-- Jessica Garrison and Shelby Grad



Its about time. Keeping those babies in the hospital is costing us taxpayers a fortune.
Posted by: ksmith | March 16, 2009 at 09:01 AM
I am happy for Nadya's mom, that she will be getting a break from child care. I am close to her age, and it tires me out, just thinking of watching so many kids.. Even if they are her grandchildren.. I pray every thing works out for Nadya..
Posted by: Judith | March 16, 2009 at 09:14 AM
I think what people really want to read and hear is that this welfare fraud nutcase is finally being made to PAY BACK the money she has been stealing from the taxpayers for years. She is reportedly making money off all her appearances!!
Posted by: Marie | March 16, 2009 at 09:41 AM
Its all abit crazy but i gotta say Nadya is HOT and i only live just down the street....
Posted by: Jason | March 16, 2009 at 10:27 AM
Let them go home and then leave them all alone and stop reporting on it. She said she can take care of the eight new ones and the existing six children. Now its up to her and the County child welfare staff to determine if they can. By the way by moving from Whittier to La Habra, she moved from L.A. County to Orange County. Does this change the child welfare staff? Leave the good people of La Habra alone too! Move those damn news trucks!
Posted by: Just walking the dog here. | March 16, 2009 at 11:17 AM
I rather pay for the babies then the dumb war.
Posted by: Ajay | March 16, 2009 at 11:39 AM
If you think that the babies will be provided for privately when they are released from the hospital, you may want to think again.
A visit to the Angels in Waiting website indicates that state/county foster care plus Medi-Cal (both government programs) pay the salaries for the foster and nursing care.
Read for yourself at:
http://www.angelsinwaitingusa.org/nursesneeded.html
From the site: "How does this transfer to a paycheck? Linda is compensated by the Family Foster Agency for caring for the child and bills the In-Home Operations Section of Medi-Cal as an Independent Nurse Provider for up to 12 hours a day for her in-home nursing hours."
Angels in Waiting is asking for donations from private parties to pay the $135,000 a month for "wrap around care," but are those donations in place? And, how much is going to Angels in Waiting for "administrative" costs?
LA Times: Please check this out.
Posted by: SharonOC | March 16, 2009 at 12:04 PM
To all the OCTO-loving WHINERS (…Leave her alone; what has she done, ETC ETC ETC ….)
ALL OCTOmom has to DO to make ALL THIS vitriol go AWAY — is STAY HOME being a GOOD MOTHER! And: put the CHILDREN FIRST! Instead of THEM being used to satisfy her GREED, loneliness and delusional fantasies.
The OCTO-CRIB remains a PIG STY while she stays out SHOPPING continuously (soap & water are cheap)! Her children LOOK LIKE street urchins; they are her PLAY-things — NOT her RESPONSIBILITY. She should STOP living off EVERY-thing but her own hard work. She has NOT put the children AHEAD of her own SHOP-A-HOLIC need for attention.
Nadya the USER is the only one TO BLAME for all the ridicule. She actually BELIEVES people LOVE HER because her ABERRANT behavior was rewarded by Gloria & Dr Phil who enabled her RATHER THAN insuring she got good psychiatric care.
NOBODY asked HER to be a BABY FACTORY and SCAMMERS do not engender RESPECT!
Nadya HAS NO PLANS for securing her childrens future. New clothes, make-up and comic lip enlargements do NOTHING for the kids! Yet shopping seems HER ENTIRE FOCUS.
She’s acting like TRAILER TRASH LOTTERY winners who can’t spend NEWFOUND RICHES fast enough!
THE BEST THING for those kids is being raised by LOVING FAMILIES who WOULD put the children first.
The LAST THING those kids need is being EXPLOITED so Nadya can continue SPENDING foolishly. The specter of innocents being sensationalized to a freaky TV audience only makes them TARGETS for pedophiles! NOT something any SANE parent would expose innocent children to.
Posted by: Karen Lee | March 16, 2009 at 01:42 PM
That's nice that the TMZ people cleaned some mess.
Posted by: Michelle | March 16, 2009 at 02:14 PM
She just spent another 1000$ on makeup and manicure.
I won't be surprised if she ditches the babies to be left in the free care that's being provided for her, and go back to school to get her Masters degree. As if that will ever come close to paying those hospital bills and student loans.
Posted by: Allison | March 16, 2009 at 02:19 PM
Follow the Money/Follow the Smurfers! Federal Law controls real estate brokers and others in trade or business who receive more than $10,000 in a transaction; they must file IRS Form 8300 which government uses to trace money. A Straw Buyer is a person who allows their name, identity and their credit rating to be used to secure real estate; generally do not occupy property. Purpose being, to disguise the origins of money, often with the intent to flip. Straw Buyer's bank account can be temporarly funded, later removed and timely payments made. In the Sulemen real estate purchase, Nadya claims her home was paid for with her money she "earned." Based on Nadya's claim alone, it appears Ed Doud Sulemen is more like a Straw Buyer than Bona Fide Purchaser.
What's the gimmick? Nadya Sulemen told Dr. Phil on his TV show "she put money from selling photos of babies into an escrow account for new home and some of money to go into trust for 14 children". Sulemen trio's have a redundant pattern; use of "trust" and "transfers". Their previous house, on El Soneto was originally in the name of Angela V Suleman. Then changed to The Angela V Suleman Revocable Living Trust. Now, owned by the bank because they weren't making the
mortgage payments there either. The house on Sunrise was handled the same way. In pre-forclosure, behind in payments! It was put in Angela's name then switched to the living trust. Will new house that Sugar Daddy Ed Doud Sulemen claims he purchased fall akin to the other two? Be transfered into trust in his name, another's name or someone's unrevokable trust? Under real estate law, he is legally the purchaser of house on Madonna in La Hambra. More than likely their charades will follow suit to past purchases; be tranfered at some date in time. Appears Sulemen's have some sort of pattern going and sounds to me like a repeat; racket that doesn't happen by mere
chance!!
Posted by: ELM | March 16, 2009 at 03:19 PM
Allison, that's a terrible thing to say.
You can talk all the mess you want to about the situation, but remember it's not your situation. And it happened, there's no going back. Nothing you say matters because it won't change a thing.
Rather then be negative, be nice. She's a mom. Just because she's got 14 kids rather than the "usual" 3, doesn't make her a bad person.
She needs support, not criticism.
Calm down.
Posted by: Danielle | March 16, 2009 at 03:39 PM
wth...is she still on public assistance of any kind? If she is I guess the taxpayers paid for her little trip to Disneyland with 6 kids.
Posted by: Lawrence Mehlenbacher | March 16, 2009 at 07:23 PM
Follow the Money/Follow the Smurfers! Federal Law controls real estate brokers and others in trade or business who receive more than $10,000 in a transaction; they must file IRS Form 8300 which government uses to trace money. A Straw Buyer is a person who allows their name, identity and their credit rating to be used to secure real estate; generally do not occupy property. Purpose being, to disguise the origins of money, often with the intent to flip. Straw Buyer's bank account can be temporarly funded, later removed and timely payments made. In the Sulemen real estate purchase, Nadya claims her home was paid for with her money she "earned." Based on Nadya's claim alone, it appears Ed Doud Sulemen is more like a Straw Buyer than Bona Fide Purchaser.
What's the gimmick? Nadya Sulemen told Dr. Phil on his show "she put money from selling photos of babies into escrow for new home and some of money to go into trust for 14 children". The Sulemen trio's has a redundant pattern; use of "trust" and "transfers". Their previous house on El Soneto was originally in the name of Angela V Suleman. Then changed to The Angela V Suleman Revocable Living Trust. Now owned by the bank because they weren't making mortgage payments there either. The house on Sunrise was handled the same way. In pre-forclosure, behind in payments! First put in Angela's name then switched to the living trust. Will new house that Sugar Daddy Ed Doud Sulemen claims he purchased fall akin to the other two? Be transfered into a trust in his name, another's name or someone's unrevokable trust? Under real estate law, he is legally the purchaser of the house on Madonna in La Hambra. More than likely their charades will follow suit to past purchases; be tranfered at some date in time.Appears some sort of pattern going on with the Sulemen's. Sounds to me like a repeat; racket that doesn't happen by chance!!
Posted by: ELM | March 16, 2009 at 07:53 PM
Shouldn't the state be looking at two issues regarding Ms. Suleman's financial behavior:
1. If she could afford invitro, how could she possible be income and asset eligible for any government assistance including food stamps and what appears to be free medical insurance?
2. Given the number of interviews and the media attention and the large amount of income she has recently received, should not the state be looking closely as to recovering some of the costs she has unilaterally and unfairly placed on the public?
I wonder how many lay-offs and reductions in social services Ms. Suleman's selfishness has amounted to thus far. Does anyone else?
Posted by: Kathy | March 16, 2009 at 08:22 PM
Her success and happiness are in my prayers.
Posted by: lucinda A Sire | March 16, 2009 at 08:53 PM
Greetings!
What did Nadya Suleman's mother keep telling her? Oh, if she wanted and entire kindergarten class of babies, she should become a kindergarten teacher and NOT give birth to the entire class herself!
Nadya's parents both knew that she as suffering from a PSYCHOTIC OBSESSION to have endless numbers of babies, so why did not her doctor realize that at that FRANKENSTEIN FERTILITY CLINIC Nadya went to and just stop implanting those embryos into Nadya and refer her to a psychiatrist who specialized in her type of problem?
Everyone acts like Nadya implanted those SIX embryos into herself ... she did not! Some kind of FRANKENSTEIN medical doctor did implant and entire LITTER of embryos into a human female while knowing that humans can only carry one fetus ,,, and not a entire LITTER!
Nadya Suleman is the VICTIM of those FRANKENSTEIN fertility pigs, a fact of life, therefore just learn to accept it, please!
There simply are some women who are utterwise very normal, except for having a PSYCHOTIC OBSESSION to have endless numbers of babies ... accept that, please.
Well, both of Nadya's parents, others, say that Nadya is a great mother to her first six children. So what needs to now be done ... since those that FRANKENSTEIN fertility clinic has VICTIMIZED Nadya so grossly?
Well, I do agree with Dr. Phil, that now it is best that all of those babies remain with Nadya and people just try to be very supportive of her ... that is best for all of those babies.
If you are so worried about paying taxes for this entire huge mess ... might I strongly suggest that you all email Nadya Suleman at her website and encourage her to sue her FRANKENSTEIN fertility doctor and clinic, please? They should be footing the entire bill of raising those babies and no one else!
When Nadya has FOUR babies, the oldest being four years ... that FRANKENSTEIN fertiliy doctor implanted her with TWINS! And then he turned right around and implanted her with a LITTER of SIX EMBRYOS ... two of which split and twinned out! Rich or poor, married or not, that was INSANE of that FRANKENSTIEIN fertility clinic to have done to any women!
The TRUTH is that Nadya could NOT even get pregnant at all ... she was IMPLANTED with those embryos for all of her babies. She did NOT do this to herself, she was the VICTIM of FRANKENSTEIN medical doctors who did it to her!
Well, a single mother ... that fertiliy clinic should have realized that Nadya was suffering from an extremely serious problem AFTER THE FIRST TWO BABIES when Nadya kept coming back for more and more babies.
Nadya is not a typical poor women who has a low IQ and lacks edcuation ... she is very intelligent and goes to college. She did NOT do this for attention or to live off of taxpayers! She drove her mother to see a psychogist, who kept telling her mother to simply kick Nadya out of her home ... to wake her up to the reality of taking care of, along, all of those endless numbers of babies that Nadya has a PSYCHOTIC OBSESSION that she had to have.
Come on, everyone, let's all WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE ... that FRANKENSTEING doctor and fertility clinic needs to be SUED for having VICTIMIZED Nadya Suleman ... they should have referred her to a psychiatrist who specialized in this sort of problem after Nadya had the first two infants and wanted more immediately! When would have those FRANKESTEINS stopped implanting Nadya, if not for these octuplets occurring, to get this mass media coverage? Never!
Nancy
Posted by: Nancy Luft | March 17, 2009 at 09:46 AM
Nadya, Dr. Phil, and her doctor are all greedy and corrupt. Nadya's no innocent victim, she's not crazy, but she's not too sharp either. It doesn't matter how much Nadya's few supporters rant and rave (and put everything in CAPs), no one is buying their load of bunkum. Nadya's a mercenary opportunist who's loving every interview and enjoying spending the money (on makeup, video games, and a very nice home) that should be used to pay back the taxpayers and her myriad bills. Nadya's on her way out, and thank goodness for that. Let us hope that those who would emulate this woman will figure it's not worth it. We have enough parasites in our country--bankers, insurers, car manufacturers, and people like Suleman. They're all the same--disgusting and out of touch with the times.
Posted by: RogerT | March 17, 2009 at 05:31 PM
Suleman and her clan are crooks. They know how to play the system for all it's worth. N.S. is not psychotic, she's just greedy and will do whatever it takes to keep herself in MAC lip gloss and implants. She's nothing special, she's not bright, she's not at all attractive, she's got no talent (unless you consider lying a talent) and she's about as charming as a hemorrhoid. Nadya loves money, and Nadya loves Nadya. She doesn't want to be let alone, she wants publicity and free merchandise. The Sulemans are a shady bunch of creeps, and I hope that taxpayers and responsible citizens stand up for what's right and this abomination doesn't happen again. There's no way to excuse or justify what N.S. or her doctor did. Make them pay.
And Phil McGraw is a horse's patootie.
Posted by: Wes27 | March 18, 2009 at 12:42 AM