L.A. NOW

Southern California -- this just in

« Previous Post | L.A. NOW Home | Next Post »

Aircraft landings at LAX are quieter, cleaner

Up to half the aircraft that land at Los Angeles International Airport each day now use arrival techniques that save fuel and reduce noise and air pollution in neighborhoods along the eastern approaches to the nation’s fourth-largest airport, the Federal Aviation Administration has announced.

Officials say it also makes flying safer during landings, one of the most critical phases of a flight.

The procedures, known as continuous descent approaches, allow airplanes to glide into LAX under minimum power instead of making a string of stair-step descents that require pilots to rely on their engines to repeatedly speed up and then slow down to level off.

The FAA estimates that on average about 300 to 400 of the 800 aircraft that land daily at LAX use continuous descent.

“It’s like taking your foot off the gas at the top of a hill and just gliding straight into the airport from 18,000 feet on a smooth, controlled path to touchdown,” said Walter White, an FAA manager who headed a team that developed the procedures.

Although more study is required, FAA officials conservatively estimate that the technique at LAX alone saves airlines at least 1 million gallons of fuel annually and reduces carbon dioxide emissions, which have been linked to global warming, by about 18 million pounds a year.

In addition, there are indications that the procedure reduces noise in the communities beneath the flight paths.

At Louisville International Airport, United Parcel Service has reported a 30% reduction in aircraft noise within 15 miles of the airport.

During flight trials in May 2008, Delta Airlines officials said that noise reductions of 3 to 6 decibels were achieved within 25 miles of Hartsfield-Jackson airport in Atlanta.

Depending on the aircraft, Delta also reported that it cut carbon dioxide emissions by 200 pounds to 1,250 pounds and saved 10 to 60 gallons of fuel per arrival.

“For everyone in the L.A. Basin, this is a help, a total win-win," said Denny Schneider, an airport activist and member of the Alliance for a Regional Solution to Airport Congestion. "You’ve got the fuel savings, the noise reductions and the attendant reduction in contamination. That, in itself, is important because airplanes are a major source of pollution."

In addition to carbon dioxide, jet engines emit harmful nitrous oxides, a major cause of smog, and fine particles of soot, a health-threatening pollutant that is largely uncontrolled.

The emissions have become a concern in airport communities worldwide, including those around LAX, where an air pollution study is now underway.

After more than a decade of research, the FAA implemented continuous descents at LAX in December 2007 on one of the eastern approaches. Since then, the agency has converted the other two eastern routes to the procedure, making LAX the only airport in the nation to have such a broad application of the technique.

The routes follow the same flight paths as the old, conventional approaches and pass over San Bernardino, Ontario, Chino, Diamond Bar, Whittier, Bell Gardens, South Gate, Los Angeles and Inglewood -- communities that have long been concerned about overflights.

Inbound planes reduce power and begin their glide about 60 to 80 miles east of LAX. FAA officials say that onboard computers calculate the best path of descent based on the aircraft’s performance abilities.

No special equipment is required, so virtually any aircraft can come in using continuous descent.

The next step is to develop the procedure for the southern and northern approaches to LAX, which has become a model for other airports across the country that are exploring the technique.

Ultimately, White said, the FAA wants to use the procedure for all flights coming into Los Angeles. In addition to fuel savings and environmental benefits, airline industry officials say continuous descents can improve safety during landings.

Approaches are simpler because pilots no longer have to descend and level off repeatedly, and they don’t need to communicate as much with air traffic control to obtain clearances and directions.

“You’ve got the ability to stabilize the airplane because you don’t have the stop-and-go procedures. Less radio communication is required, which eliminates chatter and the confusion that can go with it,” said Basil Barimo, vice president of operations and safety at the Air Transport Assn., a national trade organization that represents carriers.

Compared to standard arrival procedures, FAA officials say that continuous descent approaches require about half the radio communications between pilots and air traffic controllers.

Eventually, Barimo said, continuous descent will be used across the country as satellite-based positioning systems become more precise about the locations of aircraft, allowing air traffic controllers to efficiently coordinate their arrivals at airports.

-- Dan Weikel

 
Comments () | Archives (4)

It's great to know that this is happening. But the article doesn't address the question of the trade-off... why hasn't this happened sooner? What's the flip-side of the issue? My guess is that this procedure increases flight time by drawing out the descent. I wish the article would have discussed this.

The reason these kind of landing haven't been done is because of GPS. GPS may be used by the military to drop bombs precisely on their targets, but when it comes to navigation in the civilian sector, it is still a new thing. Airliners do have GPS now, but our ATC is still using radar and it's outdated.

Europe now has been using GPS ILS landings, but not in the US. So there isn't any trade-off, its lack of money and updating the nations ATC.

I live under the flight path into LAX, LA-Inglewood area, I do not beleive that the noise levels have dramatically decreased as stated in the article. Noise pollution is still a big problem for the residents in the area. Don't get me wrong but I do applaude the efforts by LAX in trying to save fuel.
Thanks

Who the hell cares about being so green in LA with gang crime and graffiti!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Clean to me is a city free from gangs!!!!!!!!


Connect

Recommended on Facebook


Advertisement

In Case You Missed It...

Video

About L.A. Now
L.A. Now is the Los Angeles Times’ breaking news section for Southern California. It is produced by more than 80 reporters and editors in The Times’ Metro section, reporting from the paper’s downtown Los Angeles headquarters as well as bureaus in Costa Mesa, Long Beach, San Diego, San Francisco, Sacramento, Riverside, Ventura and West Los Angeles.
Have a story tip for L.A. Now?
Please send to newstips@latimes.com
Can I call someone with news?
Yes. The city desk number is (213) 237-7847.

Categories




Get Alerts on Your Mobile Phone

Sign me up for the following lists: