LAUSD teacher layoffs threatened

Scores of Los Angeles Unified School District teachers could face midyear layoffs, officials said Tuesday.

The dire scenario could result if the state Legislature cannot raise revenue to close part of the current year's state budget deficit, L.A. schools Supt. Ramon C. Cortines said at an afternoon news conference.

Those at risk would be the more than 2,000 probationary teachers who have taught for less than two years and lack tenure rights.

Cortines characterized such a move as a last resort, and pledged to dismiss as few teachers as possible if that becomes necessary.

"We will be bankrupt if I do not do this," he said of the need to cut at least $250 million from this year’s budget.

—Jason Song and Howard Blume

Comments

[Steve Wimer]

LAUSD needs to stop spending money at the top! There's too many administrators writing memos to each other. We should have a state run system instead of duplicating administrative positions. How many curriculum coordinators does the system need? There's federal level, state level, county level, district level, and school level. It's still ineffective. That's crazy. Just have one agency do it right! Pay people to teach, not to sit at a desk.

[Carol]

Cut 2000 admin jobs both downtown and at school sites before you cut teachers. Kids still get taught if there are no administrators, but not if there are no teachers.

[Erroll]

Seems like the Los Angeles Community College District does business the same way. Students are never their first priority. A better education system is key to restoring America

[Frustrated Teacher]

The district is cutting coaching positions and 50% at every district office. This tells us that the district offices were bloated to begin with. The people heading back into the classroom from the district offices are people who left the classroom because they didn't want to teach anymore. They're using their seniority to push newer teachers who want to teach out of a job. There is money to cut elsewhere. For example, the district spend over $100 million annually on assessments that are not mandated by the state or federal government. For every $10,000 the state gives the district, only about $7000 goes to the schools. We need to break up LAUSD.

[Michael]

Speaking as a teacher in a high needs school, while a cutback on some administrative spots is a good start what is really needed is to drop the amount of consultancy contracts LAUSD has. If it seriously cant deal without having 3/4 of a billion dollars spent on OUTSIDE consultants each year then the district really needs to be broken up.
While a few outside consultants is likely necessary there is no way that much of it cant be handled "in house." Why not tap into the several second career professionals within the teaching ranks and train them on the specific areas in which consultants are needed. I know several teachers who are former attorneys, CPAs/accountants, real estate agents, etc. who would love to be making 20 percent of what is being paid for and do at least as good of a job (really how much worse could it get) if not better.
But all of this is moot anyway since it looks like the state budget is going to destroy education in the long run.

[John]

Administration is way too top-heavy. The state needs to learn how to manage its money, and schools need to learn how to funnel money to their teachers, not to administrators.

[ML]

The cut should start from the top of the pyramid....the Executives. The amount of money they spend on lunches, business trips???, and other perks is enough to pay for two teacher's salary. Our school system is the worst in the world..and why is that...the executives at the top do not care about the children. All they care about is their luxurious life style. Their salaries should be cut in half in order to supplement a teacher's salary that is desperately needed in the classroom. Maybe they should look at the education system in Asia or Europe. Why are they successful?

[Tony]

I was laid off from my district in NorCal back in December. I ended up moving back to the east coast where I found a job within a week. CA sucks for education anymore. I hope it falls into the Pacific..... :(

[Josh]

I work at LAUSD. Here's the truth that no one talks about.

There are District employees who come to work and just merely clock in. There is no accountability on there work product. There is no checks and balances and their deliverables. No one can say anything because you cannot discipline them. It is so obvious and outrageously embarrassing.

We continue to not focus on the appropriate matters. The labor unions have a tight grip on LAUSD and is the root cause of all problems. Ask yourself this question - whyCharter teachers do so well (not shielded by the union)? It's simple - if they do not perform to the level they are asked, they will be fired. A District employee does not care. He/She knows that you cannot force them out. It's SO sad, but that is the reality of it.

In terms of consultants, I can confidently say that they are the only reason LAUSD is functioning at all. As a District employee, I a saddened by the fact that us District employees do not have enough pride to perform at the level of consultants. Or at the very least show some effort!!!

[El Latigo]

Resolve all teachers in trouble housed at the local districts. There are at least 10 per local district, with some of them over a year sitting there. They get full pay, and so does the sub. Fire them, speed up the process, but do not spend twice the money for each one of them. Wake up! Due process should be a speedy one as well. 10 per district, that is nearly 100! Nearly a million dollars just on them, not to mention the subs to replace them. Also, each local Superintendent has two secretaries. One for each hand?

[English Teacher]

I am a teacher, and in my three years at LAUSD I have had some absurdly large class sizes, at one point having 44 students in one class. This year, class size is finally under control due to a private grant my school has secured, and now I am able to teach better and enjoy my job more. Eliminating teachers will only make class sizes insanely large again for the remaining teachers, will be a scheduling headache for counselors, and be disruptive to the old classes and the new ones. Perhaps it is assumed that good, caring teachers will allow themselves to be pushed into increasingly intolerable work situations for the good of the students. Teachers have the most significant impact on students' learning, hands down. We shouldn't be talking about firing teachers before we pare down our curriculum experts, literacy and math coaches, and "coordinators",

[John Otero]

Administrator do not care if student go to school or not as long as they get theur pay check for doing nothing. If they were doing their jobs they could of streamlined the dead weight or duplicating jobs years ago. Just tell it like it is, they just want to justify their over paid jobs.

[William]

I am one of those 3,000 teachers that might be getting a pink slip. When I first joined the District one phrase I heard time and again was, "That's LAUSD for you!" I thought of this as a poor excuse for the uninspired; I know better now. LAUSD a system that is overburdened with dispassionate administrators, overprotected teachers (yes, that means UTLA), and uninspired students. We are in a new era for learners (technology age), yet the education system in Los Angeles--and the nation--seems to not realize that it is time to reach students in a manner that creates a lifetime passion for learning. That's LAUSD for you!

[Michelle]

LAUSD knows how to waste money

[Erik]

It's a shame that several bad apples tarnish the reputations of the rest of us. While I agree with many of the above comments, I do believe there are administrators in LAUSD who care a great deal about children and their education--on the other hand, there are definitely teachers who will flat out tell you that they only show up to work for a paycheck and couldn't care less about kids.

What's lacking in LAUSD is accountability. There are SO many people working for LAUSD, both at Beaudry and at school sites, who simply do not produce results. In fact, many don't seem to produce anything whatsoever. Where's the accountability? Why are they still employed by the district if their "services" cannot show an impact on student achievement?

Another challenge is UTLA making it next to impossible to get rid of those who are not producing results. Heck, you can't even get rid of a pedophile without months of investigation (for which the person in question is paid full salary and benefits)--I cite the Stephen Rooney case. As much as I believe teachers need protection from abusive working conditions, I also believe that UTLA has taken it too far. Everyone is saying "This could be the end of the union," and regretably, I hope that it is! Stop protecting people who don't positively impact childrens' academic achievement! Is that rocket science?

The bottom line is that LAUSD isn't going to change until they get the courage to truly clean house. It will never happen as people are too attached to getting paid for nothing and turning a blind eye. Therefore, I do hope it goes bankrupt and education is reorganized for the better in Los Angeles.

[Carol]

Josh,

You cannot compare charter schools to traditional schools. Charters are schools of CHOICE. A student and his/her parents fill out a form, CHOOSING to be there and follow certain guidelines.

Traditional schools must accept every student (and their problems) who crosses their threshold within certain geographical boundaries.

I agree with El Latigo that the district needs to resolve the problems of teachers on paid administrative leave. We've got two from my school sitting downtown collecting their paycheck, but not teacher. Either get them back in the classroom, or let them go with cause.

[Margaret]

LAUSD is being unfairly singled out. The above discussions bring up many points. I agree that LAUSD is "top heavy" and hires a gamut of unnecessary and high-paid consultants, as do many bureaucracies in both the private and public sectors. But one issue that is consistently missing from any discussion is the fiscal health of the state of California itself. The fundamental issue is our unwillingness to raise revenues at this time of fiscal crisis. Health care, foster care, unemployment, and mental health services are all suffering at this time. (Not to mention food banks). And the sad thing is that so many Californians are happy to have it that way. We have neglected to see the big picture.

[Jay]

What about KLCS? Do we NEED a television station? We need to focus on the core mission of the district and that does not include owning and running a TV station! Also, what about furlough days? I'm sure people would rather take a few days off without pay as opposed to lose their job.

[Carmen]

LAUSD is set up on the basis of tenure. Just because a teacher has left the classroom does not mean they did not like teaching. Most leave in hopes of making a difference in the professional educational community since after all a teacher would have the greatest insights when comparing to outside higher paid consultants.

I have been teaching for 12 years. I would find it odd to be offered an opportunity outside the classroom and not take it in fear of job cuts and loosing a job. Why wouldnt I take it when I get upset about outside consultants. Hire within! I find that LAUSD has many flaws especially when comparing the education system with the rest of the country especially New York and Chicago. However, its flaws are not the problem of administrators, coaches, coordinators, or teachers. Not all of us come to work to do nothing. Some of us actually believe in making a difference and that all children can and will learn.

LAUSD wasted millions of dollars in the past few years on a faulty pay system and a humongous school built on asbestos downtown and many other areas not to mention outsourcing to outside consultants for many other aspects. However, California has a suffering economy from the largest population of illegal immigrants to its low property taxes. It is not only LAUSD, it is the entire state. The state has lost many families in the past few years because it is not affordable. What did Cali expect would happen with the average prices of homes in the 500000???

LAUSD has managed to hire within and give opportunities to teachers who have furthered their education and have interests in the many aspects of education.

[Mike]

While I don't disagree with any of the criticisms thrown at LAUSD, I want people to understand the magnitude of a 250 million dollar shortfall.

Even if we cut all luxuries from administrative meetings, stop buying new technology, stop arts programs, force all leaves to be unpaid, these will barely make a dent compared to letting go 2000 teachers.

For instance, last year at my school we had to let go quite a number of TAs and two new teachers. A conservative estimate on their combined pay would be around 100k. Now, the last TWO years the school was outfitted with over 120 new computers (Dells), 30 color printers, and 30 black-white printers. Upper grade teachers had Elmos and a few started using Smart-boards. All of those things added together is not close to 100k. These new technology will be used for the next 4 years at least, though probably safer to say 6~8.

Again, not disagreeing with any of the criticisms. Being part of the district I make many of the same observations. Obviously more teachers and smaller class sizes will be the best. However, there's nothing that avoids bankruptcy like massive layoffs, that's just the reality of it.

[Alex]

Leave it up to Cortinez to ultimately cut new teachers. Those in education know and understand that new teachers are usually the more aggressive and are-abreast to new teaching strategies. I work for LUASD, 6 years as a teacher and currently as an intervention counselor at an at-risk school in south central Los Angeles. I agree that their needs to be accountability. Currently, at the work site that I'm in, there are individuals that have been in the district and at this school for many years, many of which are out of the classroom positions. I can not believe the waist and lack of effort I have seen at this school. Only from a few individuals. However; most of the teachers here are doing the very best they can with what they have. How will cutting positions help our current situation? Cortinez even visited our site and only degraded the staff and administration. Cortinez is totally out of touch with reality and lacks the knowledge to rectify the need to educate our students. Cutting teaching positions should not even be an option. Focus on positions that are out of the classroom and bring some accountability to those individuals. The biggest focus should be those at the local district offices and the Central Office...

[G. Greer]

Let's not forget - most don't understand the shear scale of cronysim and corruption. There are sororities controlling huge portions of the district - that only promote and seek to place their members and cronies in positions of power regardless of performance. Ethnicity and college association are everything - starting at the top. People angle to get out of classroom, only to treat the teachers with contempt once out...they weren't smart enough to get out!

Cortines is doing the best he can. Getting rid of first and second year and near career end teachers is good. MOST new teachers are ineffective. Takes a year or two to get the hang. Many 55+ teachers are burned out.

It's sad, as an educator I wouldn't want my kid here.

[Cindy]

Carmen,

It would seem that someone like you, who apparently has job security and low-regard for the working individual, would find it fitting to let go of a few individuals so that your school could finally afford those new computers you've always wanted!

The issue on most minds is: how do we keep new teacher's from losing their jobs, while weeding out those whom are overpaid, or just at a job site for the paycheck?

The reality is: most wouldn't care about the new computers, elmos, or smart boards, if they actually thought of those teachers and teacher's assistants who may now find themseleves struggling to pay the rent, mortgage, student loans... Wouldn't you need a good, competent teacher to show the students how to use the computers well, or to instruct with the elmo or smart board? The level of education is what matters, not what you can buy if you can let go of one, two, or three more employees.

I have been working as a substitute teacher while I finished my credential. I now have my preliminary and will probably have to look elsewhere (private sector or school district outside LA) for employment now. I want to see the district work out its financial issues by crunching numbers and lowering pay for those at the top of the pyramid, so that those truly dedicated to education can stay in the classrooms and teach!

[GLORIOUS]

HARDSHIP? That is an understatement for my situation as a Substitute teacher.
With what is going on in the district, we are almost a forgotten as part of the workforce. i havealmost become a nuisance making those phonecalls after 7:00am to the subdesk to ask if they have any unfilled positions for the day. The response is almost always negative, leaving a bad taste in my my mouth while wondering how I am going to meet up with my bills for the month. dont ask me if i am also facing foreclosure of my home. What do you expect from someone who did not work from June to September and only worked a few days from September to January. The problem now is whrer to turn to.

[Brit]

The parents at our small, excellent elementary school don't want senior teachers back at the school site. We have many young, fresh and inspiring teachers right now who make the community at our school well-rounded and successful. While we parents have done everything we can to help the school staff maintain academic excellence at our school, along comes the District with it's ridiculous rules under which we lie. Bumping rights are wrong. If someone has moved up, out and on from the classroom - keep walking - out the Beaudry exit and give room to those who want to be in the classroom. Charter schools are on the rise!

[Albert]

LAUSD is using scare tactics, so employees will accept pay cuts and losses of benefits. I say to shut down the schools for 1 month. I hope teachers won't accept a 10% pay cut, because they never got it back since 1989, since most other school districts pay at least 10% more in pay. So, at least teachers can stay home, and save money on transportation and other expenses, and not work for a lot less money. If they just lay off teachers it'll be useless time at school , because school will amount to be just being a babysitting service. It's not quantity of time at school but quality of time that matters. School would then be closed for the last month of school with no summer school. Teachers would have some time to save money and look for some extra work, and possibly get unemployment benefits.
When these kids are out of school for close to 4 months, politicians, parents and community members will see the benefits of education when they have to miss work to take care of their kids. Teachers, parents, and concerned community members could organize and have massive rallies. In this country we only act when there is an emergency and people are marching in the streets. This is the only way to show them. Any other means, just hides the problems, and we will all suffer from it.

[LAUSD Teacher]

With respect to some of the comments from above, I am appalled at the level of education which is not evident. Josh for instance criticizes all and of course has no solution, but cannot spell and cannot form a simple declarative sentence.
He too, must have been victim of a system which is overburdened with useless "consultants" who grab the check and don't bother to stop by the schools.
I am in the trenches and currently have a student fighting for her life as victim of a drive by. I have students for whom I buy pencils and paper and clothing and books, and anything that will encourage and help. Am I broke? Most of the time, but I don't have the unmitigated consummate brass it would take to call my self a consultant, when I have not even met the students.

[LAUSD Teacher]

I have to agree with the Teacher who has a student involved in a drive-by. Look, I have been a teacher with the district for 9 years and when I first came in I was inspired and roaring to go. I need to help the Inner-City kids that need me. I agree and disagree with Josh. Some teachers come to clock in, but there are good teachers out there and they are the only role models some of these kids have. The executive branch of LAUSD doesn't care about students and never walk into classrooms, and administrators do not necessarily reward good teachers or teachers who inspire and go that extra mile. But I have to remember why I am here. That is why I am so disturbed by the possible layoffs. I was one of those teachers 9 years ago. I am disenchanted with the system and I don't want to give my all anymore because of this system. Now I can care less about meeting proficient and more about keeping my job, and just keeping the students in school and inspired so they won't drop out. On top of the cuts, they are asking for blood from us. Teach by the letter or you'll get written up, make sure your students are proficient on tests or we'll talk to you, and let's take away your medical benefits! Now maybe a payoll cut and a strike. Teachers should have secure jobs and their focus should be on students not if they can pay their mortgage or not.

Solution: Cut from the top, not the bottom. Ramon doesn't deserve $300,000, nor did Brewer deserve his severance package. Get rid of bad administrators, contracts from outside companies, and wasteful spending. New York and Connecticut spend money on their students that is why they are the top states in education. We are 48th in the nation. Very SAD!!!!!

[Elizabeth Engler]

As a mother of two LAUSD students, I was very discouraged by Cortines' letter of January 8, 2009 that I felt the urge to reply to him with the following:

Dear Superintendent Cortines,

I read your January 8, 2009 letter and having two children in LAUSD schools, I am of course very discouraged by your predicament.

I believe that there are many areas, outside of the classrooms, where to make cuts. In my children's schools, there seems to be a Dean for everything, clueless and unhelpful counselors, coordinators, coaches, consultants, directors, several assistant principals, and not to mention unhelpful and often rude administrative staff that surfs the internet instead of working. The members of the Board of Education seem to have multiple assistants. Instead of laying off teachers and cramming our kids into already crowded classrooms (in many cases exceeding fire regulations max capacity), why not
(1) fire ineffective teachers and eliminate the staff needed to supervise them and train them;
(2) hire competent hard working administrative staff instead of hiring multiple ineffective staff;
(3) reduce the number of Deans in schools and put each Dean in charge of multiple areas rather than have one for each area;
(4) get rid of the LAUSD Newsletter. It wastes money, paper, postage and it does nothing to improve our children’s education (688,000+ copies each issue);
(5) stop offering free meals (it may also help reduce the childhood obesity/diabetes epidemics),
(6) require a tuition from non tax payers (local community colleges and the University of California charge a higher tuition for out of state residents. Why our schools offer free education to non-tax-payers?);
(7) allow schools to take the lowest bid when looking to refurbish their facilities instead of paying 4 times as much by going with LAUSD approved contractors;
(8) eliminate redundant administrative positions that do nothing to improve our children's education;
(9) eliminate paid leaves for teachers and aministrators.

I hope that you’ll work to make sure that our tax dollars go to increase the quality of public education in Los Angeles and improve the facilities where our children spend so much time in every day, and not decrease it, as you anticipate in your letter. Our 8th grader has a 4.0 GPA and our high school (Uni High) has an API of 659. A shame! Our middle school (Emerson) also has very mediocre ratings. As it is, LAUSD can't guarantee us a school that can serve the needs of our children. With scores so low, lead in the drinking fountains, non-functional bathrooms, as parents we are already frustrated with what we are getting for our tax dollars. Your letter, announcing an even uglier future for our public schools, is very discouraging to parents and students.

Elizabeth Engler

Mother of two LAUSD students

[may]

I teach in an inner city school. What an exhausting job, compounded by immense drama, both from students and parents. Every day, arguing, hitting, defiance, and this is from 7 year olds! Would you like being a peacekeeper by solving problems constantly, and oh yeah, teaching in between.

People who do not teach in these kinds of neighborhoods have no clue how worn out we are from the stress of it all. We need combat pay. Oh, and now I've been pinked.

Now, because of cutbacks, class size will increase, but there is not one teacher here that has a teacher aide, though if any teachers need assistance, we do.

LAUSD does not need new textbooks. We have plenty of books in good condition, but I can't say the same for the poor teachers.

[Keep It Simple....]

Dearest Teachers...
Have you read your own comments before posting them??? Do you realize the entire world is watching LAUSD right now and that you are simply confirming the need to restructure the district and let teachers go due to your own internal disaccord, loathing and inability to support one another? Thank God that LAUSD has one of the most powerful unions in the nation. Teachers must have some degree of protection and support due to the legalities involved in teaching and working with children. I mean, that is just general common sense. Now has the system failed in some instances? Certainly, but those are the exceptions to the rule. In all honesty, there are good and bad apples in EVERY profession. I think that most of the teachers at LAUSD do care about teaching, their students and more than just simply picking up a paycheck. I mean, my God, there's a lot of much easier and less stressful ways to earn a living for those who have been educated and hold accomplished degrees. It amazes me that when our country starts speaking on districts and comparing the successes and failures of each, that they often fail to take into consideration legitimate differences in language barriers, parental support, home environment of students, etc. Not to even begin to mention the INEFFECTIVENESS OF THE CURRENT PROGRAMS, NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND LEGISLATION AND OPEN COURT MATERIALS that teachers are FORCED to teach regardless of their effectiveness or the lack thereof. I mean...if there were going to be an overhaul of the system, wouldn't we first take a look at the PROGRAM or the CURRICULUM. Don't just say that the charter schools and small learning communities are doing so much better than inner city schools. There is so much more to the scenario than that. These schools have teachers that are actually allowed to TEACH and not to simply function as robots of the system. Their teachers are not required to stick to an ineffective curricula that teaches DOWN to kids. But rather, administration turns the blind eye and allows them to actually pick CURRICULA that works! Imagine that!!! Most people are totally unaware that even after obtaining multiple degrees, rigorous training, credential programs and everything else that the vast majority of LAUSD teachers are required to function as robots and not allowed to deviate from an obviously ineffective program forced upon inner city schools. Imagine the fact that after all of the training and requirements to teach (WHICH ARE MANY FOR THOSE WHO DON'T KNOW) that LAUSD's teachers are still not trusted to actually teach. They are locked into minute by minute timetables for teaching students in which they must swim or sink. They are not allowed to deviate from the program even if they know of a means for transferring the knowledge or skills to a student that may be more effective. They are not allowed sufficient input on the selection of the materials that are being taught to students, even though who would know better than the ones who are actually in the trenches, in the classroom and working with the students. Oh yeah...and what about legislation that does not allow for a sufficient transitioning from foreign languages to English, even though LAUSD has the largest population of second language learners out of any school district in the nation. When evaluating the success of charter schools one should also consider that as previously mentioned, yes they are schools of choice and their parents go the extra mile to put them into these schools. They also tend to have a higher percentage of parents who are involved with their students, support their students, make sure that homework is done and support their educational needs. These factors obviously contribute significantly to academic success. Now although it does still occur to some degree, this of course is not a consistent reality in our inner city schools and is often a BATTLE that teachers deal with on an everyday basis. These scores translate into much deeper issues and pointing the finger just doesn't work. It is only making the real issues even harder for the public, parents and media to identify. LAUSD teachers are going to have to become more well versed in educating the public, politicians and the media on what is holding our kids behind, as well as to let them know what does work and what they do need in order to achieve success. SOMEONE NEEDS TO EDUCATE THE PUBLIC ON THE VAST DISPARITIES WITHIN THE SCHOOL SYSTEM AND INEFFECTIVENESS OF PROGRAMS. For example, I was told that there are some schools where every child has a computer at their desk which is accessible to them personally and others that may not even have one working computer for the entire class, let alone a computer at every desk. I mean...why are inner city students required to stick to a curriculum that even the best and brightest teachers have identified as ineffective, even though some of the charters and small learning communities are using a vastly different program? Or let's take it a step further, why can't all of the schools in LAUSD use the same curricula that is successful in the charter schools that is accredited with their success? Is there an issue with teaching up to certain groups of students and teaching down to others through the disparities in programs, materials accessible to students and the manner in which teachers are locked down to teach mediocrity and in other cases allowed the freedom to teach higher level academic thinking and skills? Why are the programs in inner city schools so limited and mundane and the teachers policed to not deviate from an obviously ineffective curricula? I feel that until these areas are made more equitable that it is totally unfair to single out teachers as being the source of student failure rates when they are obviously not the ones in control. Stop pointing fingers and SPEAK TRUTH to the real issues. I'm a firm believer that the rest will work itself out. However, teachers are going to have to educate the public on the realities of the current educational system. It's easy to assume that the public is aware of these things, but educators only know because they are working within the system. And by the way...thank you for all of your hard work and determination. Thank you for the long hours that you teach students that often go UNPAID. Thank you and do not lose focus of why you became teachers in the first place. There are those who support you. The public just needs to be educated and district personnel are going to have to work out their differences and stick together on some level for the overall good of the district and our nation. I wish you success in this exhausting battle. I believe that the nation is watching and LAUSD, you will set the standard. Please let it be an acceptable one. God Bless!

[Sabrina]

The truth is that LAUSD teachers are way overpaid for what they do. Walk into any LAUSD elementary school classroom and you can see first-hand how rediculous the teaching looks. It is essentially overpaid baby sitting - fingerpainting, coloring, repeating what the teacher asks them to repeat, and reading time, which by the way the teacher does. It's so rediculous. 60K for all this and they get summer off! Give me back my tax dollars!!! It is no surprise that they kids are the real loosers here, the teachers come out winning with that kind of salary to do nothing. When test scores go to normal or nationwide levels then maybe they're worthy of 35K. Think about this.

[jayanit]

Well... I visit your website first time and found this site very useful and interesting! Well... you guys doing nice work and I just want to say that keep rocking and keep it up!!!!

administration jobs in london