Ind Arc
Southern California - this just in
From the staff of the Los Angeles Times and…
 

| Main |

Is California's hands-free cellphone law working?

2:04 PM | December 30, 2008

As most of you know by now, driving while tapping such messages as "r u alone?" and "don't forget tp" on your cellphone will become illegal in California on Jan. 1.

To put it another way, the Legislature -- in all its glorious wisdom -- took only a decade to decide that it's probably difficult for someone who is typing up messages on a 2-inch screen to be giving their best effort to driving.

The Legislature, perhaps to its credit, outlawed motorists from using hand-held cellphones and driving on July 1. But text messaging was excluded from that bill for reasons of political expediency -- the bill's sponsor thought it would make it difficult to pass. When the two cellphone laws passed (one for adults, the other applying to young drivers) and the public found out text messaging wasn't included, the righteous indignation led to the text message ban.

Will the bill work? It's hard to say. The California Highway Patrol has issued 44,531 tickets for violating the cellphone talking law between July 1 and mid-December. Here's a month-by-month breakdown through November:

July -- 7,854
August -- 7,123
September -- 7,891
October -- 9,097
November -- 8,188

The bulk of those tickets -- 14,451 of them -- were issued in the CHP's southern division, which includes Los Angeles County. To help put these numbers in perspective, the CHP issued 1,166,842 speeding tickets and 203,490 seatbelt violations in 2007.

I'm curious what readers think about the hand-held cellphone ban. Is it working? Are you seeing fewer people hugging phones to their ears than before July 1? The same? More? Want to be interviewed for a story I'm working on?

Leave a comment or shoot me an e-mail.

-- Steve Hymon

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c630a53ef010536a5e2ad970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Is California's hands-free cellphone law working?:

Comments

Yesterday I saw a person using their cell phone the old fashioned way (not hands-free) and they had CA exempt plates! I don't think the ban is working and I still see many people breaking the law.

Point is to get people to pay attention to the road and their surroundings, and to have both hands on the wheel as per CA Vehicle Code. Jusr because someone is using a hands free device does not mean they are doing that ( paying attention to the road and their surroundings or other drivers. When you are talking ont he phone and driving, you stil are not concentrating on driving regardless to if you have both hands on the steering wheel or not. What about folks who drive with a stick shift? they cant have both hands on the whell at all times either... they gonna outlaw manual transmissions too?

I totally agree with jujubee - the $20 fine is way too low fpr the first offense. Lately I have seen so many people driving with their cellphones in their ear and not paying attention to what is on the road. I would love it if cellphones were disabled while a car is being driven. Drivers should have their full attention on driving, not on talking on the phone....even with hands-free devices. If they want to talk, let them safely pull over to the side of the road, if the phone call is SO IMPORTANT. Even pedestrians and bicyclists and skateboarders are on their cellphones all the time, also not paying attention to what is on the road ahead of them. Gee, what did we ever ever do before there were cellphones?

The law allows you to use speakerphone but you have to put the phone on your lap or in a position where you're not actually holding it while talking.

I like how some people think hands free means not putting the phone to their ear, so they are holding the phone in front of their face using the speaker phone.

I don't think the hand-held cellphone ban is working. I see almost every person who is driving with their phone attached to their ear. It seems that the ban is not as effective or people just dont care about. To make matters worse, I saw a police officer with his cell phone on his ear about one month ago in San Fernando Valley.

Two nights ago I saw a woman leaving a drive-thru window with her hand holding her cell phone to her ear, her face half-turned. I wonder really doubt that she had full attention on the road.

its not working, people are still using cell phones, make the $20 fine $1000 and lets see what happens

I definitely see fewer now than before the ban, but there are still plenty of people on the phone. Right after it was implemented, there was a period when I didn't see anyone holding a phone to their ear. That's long gone. I also see a lot more Bluetooth headsets, so I guess the ban must have been great for them.

The hands-free law, which was always just window dressing compared to an outright ban on driving and phoning, worked for about 2 weeks. Now there are more people using a Blue Tooth-type devie, but there are still a huge number of people with cell to ear, driving away. It seems that once they realized the difficulty of enforing the law (sheer numbers, and it's relative harmlessness compared to other crimes, mean most people get away with it), people started to ignore the ban.

I honestly believe that the recent ban will be of little help. I personally have not noticed a major change in the driving habits of other drivers. I do not doubt that the law will help regulate the issue, but only to a certain degree. There are laws in CA prohibiting speeding above the posted limit and prohibiting driving under the influence, but that doesn't stop us all...

Plenty of people are still using their cell phones "the old fashioned way", but what is more scary is the increased danger associated with people fiddling with their hands-free earpieces. From my own personal experience, they are flaky, and they tune in and out, which is way more distracting than using the regular cell phone without them. I'm a reasonably tech-savvy guy, so how do you think those less so are doing with these fickle devices? I'd hate to be nearby them on the road where they are 'fiddling'.

This is a totally misguided law, which is attempting to legislate against stupidity and is of course failing. Where is the law against turning around to yell at your children, or the one against eating fries without a hands-free ketchup dispenser? The only winners out of this law are the bluetooth headset manufacturers.

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Advertisement


Overheard
Shameful. Banning and censoring is far more fascist than Wagner's single note (the man was dead before Hitler was born).
 
- Dundili, on L.A. County Supervisor Mike Antonovich's demand that L.A. Opera cancel its planned staging of Wagner's Ring Festival
 





Advertisement


 

Lakers: All things purple and gold
L.A. Land: Real estate news and insights
Up to Speed: L.A. car culture
Daily Travel & Deal Blog: For restless SoCal
Daily Dish: Inside scoop on food in L.A.
The Daily Mirror: L.A. crime 50 years ago
Jacket Copy : Book news and information
Culture Monster: All the arts, all the time
To Live and Buy in LA : Finding the best values online & in stores
Hero Complex : News on genre films, graphic novels, and science fiction
Pop & Hiss: The L.A. Times music blog
Show Tracker: What you're watching
Greenspace: Environmental news from California and beyond
Booster Shots : Oddities, musings and some news from the world of health
Outposts: Getting the most from the great outdoors
L.A. Unleashed: All things animal in Southern California and beyond
Money & Company: Tracking the market and economic trends
The Movable Buffet: Dispatches from Las Vegas
Technology : The business and culture of our digital lives
The Fabulous Forum: The who, what, where, when, why and why not of L.A. sports
Dodger Thoughts: Jon Weisman's daily Dodger discussions

 

Atwater Village Newbie
blogdowntown
Calbuzz
CaliforniaAuthors.com
The Canalis Report (Long Beach Press-Telegram)
Capitol Weekly
Curbed Los Angeles
Eating L.A.
The Eastsider LA
The Elegant Variation
Fast Food Maven (OC Register)
The Foothill Cities Blog
Deadline Hollywood
Downtown News
FishbowlLA
Franklin Avenue
Jewish Journal
LA Metblogs
LA Observed
LA Taco
LA.Streets Blog
Los Angeles Fire Department blog
Malibu Surfside News
Mayor Sam
Neon Tommy
Dan Walters (Sacramento Bee)
Daniel Weintraub (Sacramento Bee)
The Sausage Factory (L.A. Daily News)
Science Dude (OC Register)
Seal Beach Daily
The Volokh Conspiracy
Ron Kaye L.A.
 


LOCAL FEEDS

Times Community Newspapers:
Burbank Leader
Newport Beach: Daily Pilot
Laguna Beach: Coastline Pilot

Huntington Beach Independent
Glendale News Press