Crime | Government | Medical marijuana | Education | Swine flu | Traffic | Westside

L.A. NOW

Southern California -- this just in

« Previous Post | L.A. NOW Home | Next Post »

Looser term limits for L.A. city officials upheld

September 25, 2008 |  2:29 pm

Take off your shoes, stay a while A court of appeal has upheld Proposition R, the 2006 ballot measure that loosened term limits for the Los Angeles City Council, according to a spokesman for City Attorney Rocky Delgadillo.

Proposition R gave the 15-member council a third, four-year term. Had the three-judge panel struck down the ballot measure, the upcoming municipal election would have been thrown into chaos -– a good or bad thing, depending on how you view the City Council.

Five council members who are running in the March election are doing so because Proposition R will let them stay another four years -– as long as they are re-elected, that is. A court defeat of Proposition R would have forced those council members to look for other jobs, and caused a whole new crop of candidates to scramble for those suddenly vacant seats.

Such a turn of events would have created the most unpredictable election at City Hall in nearly a decade. But that scenario is now off the table, unless the state Supreme Court intervenes (which is pretty unlikely).

Proposition R, by the way, does not apply to citywide elected posts: city controller, city attorney and mayor. Most incumbents at City Hall are running unopposed or have challengers with virtually no money.

-- David Zahniser

Photo credit: Los Angeles Times


Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments



Advertisement

Recent Posts



Archives
 

More L.A. Coverage