L.A. Land

The rapidly changing landscape of the real estate market in Los Angeles and beyond

Category: Statistics

Average U.S. closing costs fall; San Francisco grabs the No. 4 spot

September 3, 2009 |  7:15 am

Closing costs are steep in the city by the Bay The average cost of getting a mortgage dropped about 12% nationwide over the last 12 months, according to a new study by Bankrate Inc.

Nationwide, the average closing fees on a $200,000 mortgage, with 20% down and a 30-year fixed-rate loan, totaled $2,732, down from $3,118 in 2008, the study found. Closing costs for home buyers haven't been this low since 2007, the survey said.

San Francisco had the 4th-highest closing costs in the United States, with average expenses of $3,117, a decline of 6% from $3,321 in 2008, the study said. Last year, San Francisco was ranked 11th in the survey, Bankrate said.

New York had been the most expensive state for closing fees for four consecutive years, with Texas holding steady in second place, the study said. But, in the most recent study, the two states switched spots.

On a $200,000 mortgage, closing costs in Texas averaged $3,855, the survey said. Closing fees in New York averaged $3,408, the study said.

Nevada was the cheapest state for closing costs with an average of $2,276.

The decline in closing costs for home buyers is a testament to the downward price shift in the real estate market, Bankrate said.

Researchers chose ZIP Codes in the largest cities of each state, analyzing the closing costs for a $200,000 home mortgage to figure out their averages, the survey said.

California was the only state to be broken in two for the study -- San Francisco and Los Angeles, Bankrate said. Average closing fees in Los Angeles came in at $2,861, which was good for the 14th spot. That's down 12% from $3,250 in 2008.

Bankrate's survey includes lenders' origination fees and title and settlement fees. Taxes, insurance, homeowners association dues or prepaid items weren't included in the study.

-- Nathan Olivarez-Giles

Photo: A recently sold home in San Francisco. Credit: Getty Images


Women more likely to conserve, survey says

November 11, 2008 | 12:35 pm

The folks at Better Homes and Garden Real Estate say a survey of homeowners shows that women are more likely than men to cut household waste and consumption. Seventy-two percent of women said they changed their light bulbs to compact fluorescents, 59% cut water use and 75% recycled.

Among male respondents, 65% switched to energy-saving light bulbs, 53% cut water use and 70% recycled.

Go ahead and call me a sexist, but I wonder how much of the difference is due to male householders not doing their fair share of dishwashing, light bulb changing and taking out the trash. Just asking, fellas.

-- Peter Hong

   


Is the high-end immune? Maybe, maybe not

July 28, 2008 | 12:17 pm

     Whether expensive homes in prestigious areas will escape the housing crash remains a hotly debated topic. I hear from many readers (and see some examples where I live) of houses still selling, sometimes quickly, and sometimes for prices higher than the owners paid just a couple of years ago.

      Yet economists I interview contend prices at the high end are just sticky -- they take longer to fall, Cliffhouse_5 but do so eventually. Holdout sellers at some point cave in, raising supply, and trade-up buyers from other areas don't have as much money to buy in the pricier neighborhoods, squeezing demand.

     John Karevoll at DataQuick Information Systems has provided a breakdown of Southern California June home sales that shows the top end is falling as well.

   The median price for the top tenth of homes sold in June was $900,000, down from $1,129,500 the same month a year ago. That's a 20% drop. Last June was the price peak for that market segment, according to DataQuick.

   The bottom tenth of homes sold fared worse, with a 41% drop in the median sales price. 

  But the June decline in the top tenth shows a reversal from last summer. In June 2007, the median sales price for that tier was UP 3%. Last June, prices in the bottom tenth had fallen 11% from the previous year.

   So the top is sliding. Or is it ? The June median sales price was actually UP from the May median for the tier of $875,000, with roughly the same number of transactions. A one-month bump may not mean much, of course. A few more months of data will give us a better picture.

--Peter Y. Hong, Times staff writer

Photo: Bob Grieser / Los Angeles Times

Comments? Questions? Email peter.hong@latimes.com


Let them buy dream homes

July 27, 2008 |  3:15 pm

Bali, or horse country? Dubai, or Park Avenue?

While many Americans are chewing over how to make their mortgage payments, 305 high-end owners (their primary residences and investment assets are each worth at least $1 million, except Californians, whose homes must be worth $2 million-plus) recently ruminated over where they'd like to land their dream homes.

The 2008 Coldwell Banker Previews International Luxury Survey reported last week that 27% of those surveyed named as their top location an island; 22% said they want a country home; and 18% prefer an Beachhouse international destination. There are plenty -- 17% -- who want a dream house based on a particular address or ZIP Code; 13% want a high-rise with amenities (can't live without a doorman); and 8% confessed to picking a location based simply on keeping up with their friends....wherever the Joneses are living these days.

And what do the well-heeled want inside these must-have mansions? Designer kitchens, customized home entertainment centers, indoor gyms and wine cellars. Outdoors: formal landscaping, water view, pool, hot tub (of course), boat dock, golf course, tennis court and that must-have --- a basketball court.

--Diane Wedner, Times staff writer

Photo: Associated Press

Questions? Comments? Email diane.wedner@latimes.com


Charting the housing slide

February 27, 2008 |  1:18 pm

Jwx0obncA quickie: A lot of us on this blog have spent a fair amount of time bickering over which housing statistics best capture market reality. It strikes me that they're all starting to capture the same reality:

According to Housing Tracker, median listing prices in greater L.A. have declined 14.6% from year-ago levels and 18.9% from their peak.

According to DataQuick, median sales prices in Los Angeles have declined 11.9% from year-ago levels and 16.7% from their peak.

According to the Case-Shiller home price index, home prices in Los Angeles dropped 13.7% over the past year.

Not a whole lot of difference.

Your thoughts? Comments? Email story tips to peter.viles@latimes.com
Photo Credit: AP





Zillow's L.A. rankings: Areas with biggest declines in home values

February 12, 2008 |  8:50 am

Zillow's quarterly analysis of real estate trends is out tonight, and contains some fascinating data. My personal take is that even though individual Zestimates -- the estimated value of a particular home -- may be unreliable in many cases, the overall trends that Zillow captures are valuable and probably pretty accurate. These are the 20 Zips in greater L.A. with the biggest year-over-year declines in median home values, as measured by Zillow.

To find the percentage year-over-year decline in median "Zestimate," click on the zip code.
Thoughts? Comments? E-mail story tips to peter.viles@latimes.com


Zillow's L.A. rankings: Areas with biggest gains in home values

February 11, 2008 |  9:38 pm

Part two of Zillow's quarterly analysis of real estate trends in greater Los Angeles --  these are the 20 zips in greater L.A. with the biggest year-over-year gains in median home values, as measured by Zillow.  Click on the zip code at right to see the percentage gain.

Your thoughts? Comments? E-mail story tips to peter.viles@latimes.com.



Advertisement

About the Bloggers

Recent Posts


Categories


Archives