Schwarzenegger signs one housing bill, vetoes another

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Tuesday signed a landmark bill that will for the first time allow the state to use its transportation funds to reward plans that provide for housing near job centers and transit corridors and that slow the advance of urban sprawl. The measure was backed, after a great deal of negotiating, by home builders, local governments and environmentalists.

Senate Bill 375, authored by Sen. Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento), requires the California Air Resources Board to set regional targets for reducing greenhouse-gas emissions by September 2010. The measure also will relax California Environmental Quality Act requirements for residential projects that meet those goals, thereby giving developers an incentive to build high-density housing near transit lines.

"This bill will help satisfy an important need as those entering their 20s and 30s enter the housing market in the next 10 years," said Richard Gollis, principal of the Concord Group, market advisors to developers, builders and financial institutions. "A large segment of them want to live in an environmentally sensitive way. Builders who want to be relevant over the next 10 to 30 years need to address this consumer group."

On another legislative note, Gov. Schwarzenegger also vetoed Assembly Bill 2447, which would have required that counties certify that the designs and locations of new subdivisions in high-risk fire areas be consistent with the state's design standards for slope, turnouts, water pressure and other factors.

Counties also would have had to certify that structural fire protection could be provided by local or state fire agencies in the area, and that firefighters and residents would be able to get in and out of the area from more than one direction.

"I look forward to working with the Legislature in the next session to pursue solutions that increase fire protection for Californians in ways that do not inappropriately combine or confuse the legitimate roles and responsibilities of the state and local governments," the governor said in his veto statement. 

-- Diane Wedner

Your thoughts? Comments?

Photo: Irfan Khan / Los Angeles Times

Comments

[Mr.Mortgage]

We just posted one the most comprehensive slideshows on the meltdown we have seen to date.
http://thegreatloanblog.blogspot.com

[sheila]

"This bill will help satisfy an important need as those entering their 20s and 30s enter the housing market in the next 10 years," said Richard Gollis, principal of the Concord Group, market advisors to developers, builders and financial institutions. "A large segment of them want to live in an environmentally sensitive way. Builders who want to be relevant over the next 10 to 30 years need to address this consumer group."

uh, if they want to be environmentally sensitive, why not move into an EXISTING structure and retrofit it with conservation and renewable generation projects? building new is wasteful and should be discouraged, especially with the enormous glut of empty houses sitting out there.

more mass transit, not more houses, is where the transportation money should have gone. do these people really think we are falling for their greenwashing of Big Builder giveaways?

[NevadaGal]

California is broke with no one ,except the Federal Government, will to give it a loan...and the Gov/legislature is passing laws to curtail greenhouse gases...WTF?