| Main |

Renter's insurance not on L.A.'s radar

Renter's insurance is not incredibly popular with Los Angeles-area residents, according to recent findings from Allstate. Although 35% of the California renters the company surveyed carry protection for their belongings, only 27% in L.A. do. In contrast, 53% of Bay Area renting respondents opted for such insurance.Apt_blog_2

Another area in the falling-down department: Allstate notes that 80% of L.A. renters haven't compiled a home inventory checklist, compared with 73% statewide.

Whether one is an insured renter or a homeowner, that checklist is going to come in handy should the need arise to file a claim. Allstate has a downloadable form, as does State Farm, among others.

What's such insurance going to set you back? Allstate puts the statewide average at $15 a month, or $180 a year, while the Insurance Information Institute places the annual average premium at $257.

-- Lauren Beale

Comments? Thoughts?

Photo: Glenn Koenig / Los Angeles Times

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c630a53ef00e5540899bd8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Renter's insurance not on L.A.'s radar:

Comments

Your Renter's Insurance premium seems low. I rent a
one-bedroom in Hollywood, 90068, and have content
insured (fire/theft) for 65K with a 1K deductable.
I pay $600. a year, currently with State Farm. I'm covered
for replacement cost on any item of personal property
up to $2,500. per item. There's a cap on electronics
which I can't recall at the moment. Paper and canvas
art and collectables aren't covered but other antiques
made of wood or metal are up to the $2,500. limit.
I've been told this is pretty standard. Yes, I'm guilty
of not having an inventory. A photo inventory is the
only way to go. Keep a copy out of state in case of
fire after earthquake. Of course, earthquake is not
covered, directly. Post earthquake theft may be(?)
I raise the policy limits 5%, every year.

Rental insurance in LA is low relative to bay area simply because many of LA renters are poor and can't afford to have renters insurance. They barely have money for gas and food. Also, since they are mostly poor, they have nothing of value, so nothing really to insure. The bay area renter are much wealthier, these are high paid earners, high tech guys, etc. So they have much more toys in their apartments so more reason to insure...also they can afford it.

No issue in this topic, next please!

The same firm which does my auto insurance offered a discount for having other lines of coverage. For a 3 Br house we are renting, it came out to $5 per month.

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In






Real Estate   FIND A HOME
CITY, NEIGHBORHOOD, OR ZIP
PROPERTY TYPE
BEDS
BATHS
PRICE RANGE
To go

All LA Times Blogs

All The Rage
American Idol Tracker
Angels Unplugged
Babylon & Beyond
Big Picture
Booster Shots
California Consumer
Comments Blog
Company Town
Culture Monster
Daily Dish
Daily Mirror
Daily Travel & Deal Blog
Dish Rag
Dodger Thoughts
Fabulous Forum
Gold Derby
Greenspace
Hero Complex
Homicide Report
Jacket Copy
L.A. at Home
L.A. Land
L.A. Now
L.A. Unleashed
La Plaza
Lakers
Money & Co.
Movable Buffet
Opinion L.A.
Outposts
Pop & Hiss
Readers' Representative Journal
Show Tracker
Technology
Ticket to Vancouver
Top of the Ticket
Up to Speed
Varsity Times Insider