Your call: Does this guy look like an Angry Renter?
Excellent story today in the Wall Street Journal elaborating on a tidbit that was on the blog a while back: The anti-bailout website AngryRenter.com is run by Washington insiders who own million-dollar houses.
As L.A. Land reported a while back, the website is the brainchild of Freedom Works, a think tank run by Dick Armey (pictured), a conservative Republican from Texas who once served in House leadership.
The Journal: "Angry they may be, but the people behind AngryRenter.com are certainly not renters. Though it purports to be a spontaneous uprising, AngryRenter.com is actually a product of an inside-the-Beltway conservative advocacy organization led by Dick Armey, the former House majority leader, and publishing magnate Steve Forbes, a fellow Republican. It's a fake grass-roots effort -- what politicos call an AstroTurf campaign -- that provides a window into the sleight-of-hand ways of Washington."
The Journal reports Armey is pulling down a comfortable $500,000 salary at Freedom Works, and that he lives on 78-acre spread in Texas valued at $1.7 million.
Your thoughts? Comments? E-mail story tips to peter.viles@latimes.com
Hat tips: hp100, via e-mail, paynoattentiontothatmanbehindthecurtain, via comments.
Photo Credit: Associated Press



Frankly, I don't give a damn who's behind AngryRenter.com but I'm glad somebody is helping give a voice to people who don't want the tax dollars of many being used to bail out a few greedy speculators and ignorant home buyers. Dick Armey, are you hiring?
Posted by: Todd in WeHo | May 17, 2008 at 12:06 PM
I don't care if the website was put together by a trained chimp.
What I DO care about is forking over more of my HARD EARNED money to bail out IDIOTS who can't pay their friggin bills.
Here's an idea - if you can't afford your house, take the credit hit and WALK AWAY. Just be done with it, already. Clearly you have crap for brains to begin with, thinking you could afford a million dollar home on a 50K/yr salary.
Posted by: Blahblah | May 17, 2008 at 01:01 PM
The posts on the angryrenter.com are not fake.
I signed the petition and commented. If you take time to read through what is there, it will become apparent that these are real people who are truly against bailing out the market.
I rent in northern Cali and would like to purchase someday soon if prices can fall to a level that I can afford with a 30 year fixed mortgage. Our annual income is 120K, so I don't think it unreasonable to think that we should be able to purchase a decent home.
I do no care who the guy who started it is, what he makes and where he lives. If he has decided to stand up for me than so be it! I will let him be my voice...
If this bill or anything like it passes... then there goes the USA...
Posted by: Hans | May 17, 2008 at 01:16 PM
So what? Who / what is behind many of these "consumer advocacy" and "homeownership" groups? You got it - taxmoney handed out by government agencies to favored connections.
Posted by: tew | May 17, 2008 at 04:13 PM
Hey Blah Blah, Those "idiots" pay taxes so they have just as much of a right to tax dollars as anyone. Your sense of entitlement is digusting.
Posted by: shockg | May 17, 2008 at 10:19 PM
It's a cookbook!
Posted by: To Serve Man | May 17, 2008 at 11:20 PM
No BAILOUT! So what, the people sponsoring the website own property? Dick Armey was interviews on a number of TV programs where he shared the thinking and positioning of the angryrenter website. They are tapping into a segment of the populace that needs a voice. Good for them.
This bill needs to be stopped. The promoters of this bill make a big deal out of the fact some people don't have equity in their homes and people need an incentive to pay their mortgage. Excuse me, but there were thousands of people in recent years that took out 80/20 loans with no down payment and of course no equity. These people didn't need an incentive then when they signed their names to the contract. Oh, it was fine with the lenders too who could have said no.
The solution to the housing crisis is lower home prices. There are plenty of people that would buy homes at lower prices. Subsidizing housing values with bad tax policy increases the overall costs for everyone in the long run. NO bailout.
Posted by: Ryan | May 18, 2008 at 07:26 AM
Makes you wonder about some of the posters here, eh? Likely just a bunch of staffers from politians offices trying to sound like they aren't. "It is the message that matters", not the lies, eh?
Posted by: SteveR | May 18, 2008 at 01:39 PM
Hey ShockG...
you want some of my tax dollars or would you rather I just flip a couple coins into your cup?
Posted by: E | May 18, 2008 at 01:59 PM
Can these guys be sanctioned for misrepresentation? Their website says they are a group of grassroots renters.
Is this legal?
Posted by: madashellrenter | May 18, 2008 at 08:28 PM
uhh... they're arguing for policy implementation as a sort of PAC, similar to moveon and others - run by soros and others...
what is the big deal? they hired a former congressperson to lead the group. AND ??
next...
Posted by: tealeaf | May 18, 2008 at 09:38 PM
The fact that they both own expensive houses actually lends TONS of credibility to their campaign (btw, I'm one of the real now 50,000 signers). Simple logic
- Everyone agrees the goal of the "bailout" is to prevent housing prices from continuing to fall and to keep people in their homes (no matter how badly they cannot afford them, or no matter how badly this plan can't work based on basic economics)
- As a result homeowners would benefit from a bailout by preserving their housing values.
- A secondary result is that rental rates would stay low (as they have been throughout the housing bubble) because people would stay in their houses and not fall back into rentals. With low demand comes low(er) prices.
- Steve Forbes is a total, unabashed free-market capitalist.
- Therefore one would assume those that own houses would be PRO a bailout (keep their housing values high) as would the renters (keep their rental rates low)
AngryRenter.com shows a completely different psychology. The most avowed Capitalists (Messrs. Steve Forbes and Dick Armey) are voting to lower their own house values and renters are voting to raise their rents.
AS A RESULT don't you think that something far more principled is going on here? I'm an Angry Renter and I believe so. Get passed the name calling and look at what is really going on here and fear the mob (they're what raised housing values and they're what will eventually take down housing values)
- Marc Itzkowitz
Palo Alto, CA
Posted by: Marc Itzkowitz | May 18, 2008 at 10:09 PM
I am glad that someone cares enough to represent my viewpoint because it doesn't seem like my own congressman or senator cares. And I've written to them to.
I am completely against a bailout of any kind. I am a renter and I think it is irresponsible government.
You know, I think I am having a hard time paying for my rent. It must be my greedy landlord. Why doesn't the government just lower my monthly payment? I deserve to get a part of the American dream don't I???
As much as some people may not agree with all of the political position of Armey and Forbes, at least they are willing to put money behind this cause. And you know that is what speaks to politicians in America. It is cash.
Why do you think the bailouts so far have been so beneficial to financial companies, and mortgage companies? They have lobbyists! So do the National Assoc of Realtors, to name some others.
Everyone has some kind of personal interest in this thing. Renters do NOT need Uncle Sam to give us yet MORE CREDIT to put us MORE INTO DEBT to buy houses that WE CAN'T AFFORD!!
Prices need to correct, pure and simple.
Posted by: Snacker | May 18, 2008 at 10:52 PM
This is a non-issue.
I don't care who made the website. I don't care who is on their staff. I don't care whether they own, rent or squat.
I care about who will pay for the borrower and lender bailout: you, me, our kids and our grandkids.
You feel sorry for people going through foreclosure? Someone has to pay for it. It's either the foolish banks and borrowers or it's your kids. Take your pick.
Sign the petition and get this bailout stopped if you have any sense at all.
Posted by: Phil O. Math | May 19, 2008 at 04:04 AM
So what? The sentiment is real.
Posted by: Rossington | May 19, 2008 at 04:22 AM
I signed the petition a month or more ago. I have to say that I AM an angry renter and I don't want my tax dollars to go towards wellfare for the RICH, and that is all this BAILOUT is. I'm also a democrat, and I would put my name and voice on angryrenter.com AGAIN if I could. Everyone who has "played by the rules" followed fundamentals, and sat on the sidelines not wanting to pay HUGE disproportionate prices for houses should not have to suffer more at the hands of bad govermental choices.
Posted by: Motheroftwo | May 19, 2008 at 09:40 AM
"It's a cookbook!"
You're funny. Old, but funny.
Posted by: Dan Moran | May 19, 2008 at 11:14 AM
You know what? I don't care who is behind that Web site!
If these guys decided to be a voice of millions Americans that don't want to spend their money for bailing out greedy and irresponsible lenders and borrowers who cares about their political orinetation? I personally don't!
I'm indy and I believe both Reps and Dems are rotten, and they care more about ideology and about paying back to their fat corporate sponsors than about voters!
Why Dems that push so hard that unfair bailout are better than retired Rep politician?
It is obvious that Senators Clinton, Dodd, Frank and Obama that care so much about working America in their speeches want to bail out their sponsors from Wall St.!
Where will the billions that they want to spent on the so-called "help" go finally? They will go to banks and lenders!
Posted by: Booba | May 19, 2008 at 12:50 PM
I am die hard progressive democrat. I simply don't care who's behind this website. What is wrong is wrong no matter who points it out.
I am sick and tired of people (greedy lenders, investors, individual home purchasers) made out like a bandit when the real estate market was booming. Now they get to keep the profit and share the loses with all of us? Consequently, these people bid up the prices of houses to stratophere. Meanwhile, housing prices have skyrocketed and ordinary people can not afford to buy houses in decent neighborhood.
Let the house prices fall so that ordinary people can afford them without having to take out exotic loan or extended (soon to be arriving to brokers near you 40, 50 years) loans.
NO BAILOUT for greedy lenders, greedy investors, and greedy individual house purchasers who helped created this mess.
Posted by: Angry house renter | May 19, 2008 at 02:01 PM
I signed the petition a month ago, but not before I read about who was behind it.
You see, unlike an underwater home owner, I like to read things before I sign them.
Posted by: HappyRenter | May 19, 2008 at 02:50 PM
Kudos to Dick Armey and Steve Forbes. Even though they own millions in real estate and would personally benefit from legislation designed to prop up land prices, they are actually AGAINST this legislation. Why? Because this legislation is morally wrong! I only wish more rich people had the same sense of fair play.
Here is another anti-bailout petition, written and circulated by myself (a poor nobody, in case that gives me more credibility)
No Mortgage Bailout!
We are outraged that Congress and the Federal Reserve have implemented a series of measures designed to prop up home prices at their current artificially high level – with little apparent concern for the resulting inflation or the cost to taxpayers.
A house is not a government guaranteed investment, it is a place to live. Like water, food and clothing, shelter is a basic human need. When a basic human need becomes more affordable for the working citizens of this country, that is a good thing. Houses are currently in the process of becoming affordable again for responsible first time homebuyers. The government should welcome this development, not intervene to stop it.
We were dismayed when rampant speculation, enabled by low interest rates, drastically increased home prices. A climate of fear and greed was deliberately fostered by the real estate industry – “buy now or you’ll be priced out of the market forever / buy quick, its not too late to get in on the easy profit.” During the price run-up, home prices were increasing much faster than household incomes. This was an obviously unsustainable situation.
Unfortunately, reckless lending practices kept pushing prices higher after homes had become unaffordable. Loans were given to home buyers who made little or no down payment. Loans were given for amounts greater than the income of the borrower justified. Loans were given without adequate income verification
Lenders and mortgage-backed securities investors are now experiencing the predictable results of their own extreme folly.
Those who hoped to profit from the real estate bubble shouldn’t now expect society as a whole to bail them out. Accordingly, we hereby petition you:
Do not spend our tax dollars to assist borrowers, lenders or investors who made unwise decisions.
Do not let inflation and low interest rates destroy the value of savings accounts. Many future home buyers are prudently saving their money for a substantial down payment.
Do not ignore the justice of this petition in the name of “the economy”. An economic slowdown is temporary, but injustice will permanently tarnish our society.
Above all, do not in any way attempt to prop up home prices at the current artificially high level. This will reward speculators at the expense of an entire generation of future home buyers.
Posted by: John Gruskos | May 19, 2008 at 03:25 PM
I think the fact that the Wall Street Journal felt that they needed to discredit AngryRenter.com shows that it is getting heard and seen as a threat by the people who want a bailout. The organizations that benefit the most from any bailout is really the banks and lenders who can't collect a penny back if they foreclose. With a bailout they can at least collect some money back from the taxpayers.
Posted by: The Baglady | May 19, 2008 at 03:36 PM
What do I care whether the petition was created by some young fool or a big-wig Republican? As long as my opinion is adequately expressed, then I'm happy. After all, these silly house buyers are represented daily by the main-stream media, which make them all look like victims. Readers often forget that the main-stream media are outlets for advertisers. Why shouldn't I be represented by an organized and powerful group as well?
Posted by: Big V | May 19, 2008 at 05:50 PM
Can a class action lawsuit be filed for misrepresentation? Can criminal charges be pressed?
Posted by: x | May 20, 2008 at 02:14 PM
You make it sound like Dick Armey has an axe to grind, but you don't. Uh... are you just being an objective journalist Peter?
32% of America RENTS - gets NO assistance from government - and why should they - yet the 4 to 5% of irresponsible home debtors get all the humping and pumping for assistance.
virtually EVERY SINGLE RENTER in LA could have "qualified" for a $500,000 no down, 1% negative am mortgage - BUT CHOSE NOT to participate in the LIAR LOAN scandal. They were too responsible!
AND EXACTLY FOR WHOM ARE YOU PULLING FOR PETER? Since you drag Armey's homeownership into the article, are you a home DEBTOR needing a bit of a bailout, Peter?
Posted by: The$120K/yr WalMart Greeter Guy | May 20, 2008 at 04:57 PM