| Main |

No jumbos for Fannie, Freddie

Not a shocking piece of news, but a development worth noting: "Mortgage finance companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will not be able to invest in loans valued above $417,000 next year, their regulator said on Tuesday, saying it will hold the current loan limit steady."

More: "The so-called "conforming loan limit" will be held in place despite falling home prices around the nation, said the regulator, the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight.

Your thoughts? Comments? Insights? Email story tips to lalandblog@yahoo.com.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/816965/23714938

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference No jumbos for Fannie, Freddie:

Comments

I know I have been fooled too many times before, but it appears that the insanity at Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae was just temporary.

Is it really a house of cards? Whats next 9.5% loans from BofA "because we can" slogan........

This is not a surprise given the turmoil at both. Their balance sheets are in bad shape.

I think Congress could still make the regulator change its mind though.

Awwwww - where is Countrywide going to find another sucker to unload those loans on?

I just love this part of the article:

"The conforming loan limit is typically pegged to average home prices across the nation but allies of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have called for the limit to be eased in the face of the current housing finance crisis."

After suffering a $2B writedown, "allies" are trying to increase the loan limits?! Whoever had the stones to say no to that deal - buy him a round on me. Guess the lobbyists underestimated how big a sack of cash they needed to bring.

OH BOY!!! What a surprise.....No jumbo loans ..I wonder why????
Go ask Angelo Or shall I say The new blue man

Well, since median income family cannot even afford to buy a $417,000 house, why would they need to increase the limit????
the whole idea of the conforming loans is to help get median families into buying a house.
If someone can afford to buy a house for $1,000,000 or more...Let him pay for it using free market loans or cash...
Besides, 90% of the house even in california and specifically southern california and even more specifically SFV, do NOT even worth $417,000. A better figure for an average SFV home is probably $250,000 and that is pushing it...
think about it.

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In






Real Estate   FIND A HOME
CITY, NEIGHBORHOOD, OR ZIP
PROPERTY TYPE
BEDS
BATHS
PRICE RANGE
To go
Our Blogger
Peter Viles
Peter Viles, senior producer for Real Estate at LATimes.com, has worked as a reporter for the Associated Press and CNN, and has written for portfolio.com. He lives on the Westside of Los Angeles with his wife, fashion designer Stacy Johnson, and their two children.

All LA Times Blogs

All The Rage
All Things Trojan
Babylon & Beyond
Bit Player
Blue Notes - Dodgers
Booster Shots
Bottleneck
Comments Blog
Countdown to Crawford
Daily Dish
Daily Mirror
Daily Travel & Deal Blog
Dish Rag
Extended Play
Funny Pages 2.0
Gold Derby
Greenspace
Hero Complex
Homeroom
Homicide Report
Jacket Copy
L.A. Land
L.A. Now
L.A. Unleashed
La Plaza
Lakers
Money & Co.
Movable Buffet
Olympics: Ticket to Beijing
Opinion L.A.
Outposts
Readers' Representative Journal
Show Tracker
Soundboard
Technology
The Big Picture
Top of the Ticket
Up to Speed
Varsity Times Insider
Web Scout
What's Bruin
Your Scene Blog