Jacket Copy

Books, authors and all things bookish

« Previous | Jacket Copy Home | Next»

Is Cormac McCarthy really headed for the Nobel?

Cormacmccarthy_ap On Monday, news started buzzing that Cormac McCarthy, chronicler of a blasted and violent early American West and, more recently, a dystopic frozen future, might be under consideration for the Nobel Prize in Literature, whose announcement is planned for Thursday. British wagering company Ladbrokes has tracked McCarthy's odds rising from 66-to-1 to 8-to-1.

That makes him the highest-ranked American, unless you count Ngugi wa Thiong'o, who as I was typing moved from second place to first; wa Thiong'o has been a resident of the United States since his exile from Kenya in the late 1970s.

Other Americans currently in the top 20 are Thomas Pynchon and Joyce Carol Oates, both 18-to-1, Philip Roth at 20-to-1, E.L. Doctorow at 22-to-1 and Don Delillo at 25-to-1.

All of this is, of course, a bit silly. Who places bets on literary contests, exactly? I read like it's my job (oh, right, it is my job), but do I want to put my money on one author against another? If I did, I would surely go for one whose writing I like, which has no connection to whatever judgments go into making a smart bet. And I'm guessing I'm not the only avid reader who would be a lousy, or reluctant, gambler.

That any American writers appear on Ladbroke's list at all may be wishful thinking. In Monday's paper, David L. Ulin notes that the Swedish Academy is "notoriously unpredictable" in awarding the Nobel Prize in literature, and in 2008 a key figure there proclaimed that American literature is "too insular and ignorant to challenge Europe as the center of the literary world."

Ulin's starting point is the Nobel, but he looks at the coming literary award season, and asks what it means. He continues:

October is as close as the book world has to an awards season. Five days after the Nobel Prize is announced, the Man Booker Prize will be awarded in London; the next morning, at Flannery O'Connor's childhood home in Savannah, Ga., the finalists for the National Book Awards will be named.

It's a lot of pomp and circumstance for a corner of the culture that seems increasingly uncertain of its role in contemporary society, where the slow, immersive satisfactions of reading are easily overwhelmed by the onslaught of the information stream. In such a landscape, readers look to awards for reassurance, as arbiters of whether a book or author is any good. Yet while that's understandable, it is, in its way, another kind of smokescreen, distracting us from the conversation about literature in favor of a more competitive frame.

I sort of hope the new Nobel literature laureate is someone I haven't heard of, writing in a language I can't read. Before Oct. 8, 2009, I'd never heard of Herta Müller; now I know that I should read her books. Which I'll do, someday, just as soon as I stop being distracted by the literary awards season.

-- Carolyn Kellogg

Photo: Cormac McCarthy. Credit: Derek Shapton/ Random House


Comments () | Archives (11)

The comments to this entry are closed.

Really, Nobel? McCarthy before Pynchon or Oates? Really? I think anti-Americanism and European chauvinism are running too high right now.

Any time I get to feeling in a really upbeat mood and I want to come back to earth I think of Cormac McCarthy's books. The thought brings me back to earth quickly. I really liked "All the Pretty Horses", but it all went down hill after that. Actually, "No Country For Old Men", was a pretty accurate depiction of what was to occur on the border. Sure did not turn out like "Sailing to Bizantium", Yeats' masterpiece. The title is borrowed from that wonderful work.

His view of the world may be correct, but it sure is depressing.

Want to become clinically depressed? Read The Road. I found Pretty Horses pretty forgettable. And the movie adaptation of his book No Country For Old Men: unforgettable; again depressing.

I think the Nobel should honor McCarthy. He is one of the greatest living writers not only in the United States, but around the world.

However my guess is another relatively unknown, or Scandanavian writer, will win the award.

Forget The Road. McCarthy's masterpiece is Blood Meridian, and I'll be shocked -- truly shocked -- if he ever surpasses that one.

McCarthy Rocks! America eats it's young. Depressing, or not it's a fact.

Gravity's Rainbow is the only book so far in life where ive had to seriously TRY and finish/get into it/accept it for what it is? And i never finished it, i never came close...i like Pynchon because of the mystic that surrounds him, sadly not for his work...Delillo would get my vote, not my BET! to remain "notoriously unpredictable" they should award the Nobel to Rudolph Wurlitzer...that would turn some heads!

There's been a pronounced anti-american bent to the nobel literature jury of late... but maybe for that reason, the dystopic vision of america that McCarthy carves into the pages of his novels might play well to these jurists, and give them an opportunity to express their animosity toward the u.s. in their announcement of the prize

Yes, in complete agreement with the other poster about "Blood Meridian". He'd be very hard pressed to surpass that one with something else. It's a modern type Melville classic.

It will go to Zagajewski.

It hasn't gone to a poet for a while.

It could go to Transtromer.

I would be pleased with either.

McCarthy will not get it. 100% nailed-on FACT.

"Onboard Skeptic":

You said:

"It's a modern type Melville classic."

You got that from Harold Bloom's introduction to the Modern Library version of said novel.

Credit where credit is due.


Recommended on Facebook


In Case You Missed It...


Explore Bestsellers Lists





Tweets and retweets from L.A. Times staff writers.