Happy Franzen publication day (or not), in 10 easy steps
Jonathan Franzen's novel "Freedom" officially goes on sale today. For some readers, and the reviewers who've been kvelling over Franzen's achievement, this is good news. For others, who have pointed to such kvelling as symptomatic of many, many of the things that are wrong with contemporary criticism, the release means nothing so much as another occasion to voice frustrations.
In case you haven't kept up on the kerfluffle, here it is:
3. The N.Y. Times runs its first review on Aug. 15, more than two weeks ahead of publication. "His most deeply felt novel," Michiko Kakutani writes, "...both a compelling biography of a dysfunctional family and an indelible portrait of our times."
4. New York magazine also gets in an early review, from Sam Anderson: "the book would probably be insufferably dull if it weren’t for the fact that it also happens to be a work of total genius."
5. Jennifer Weiner does not take the buzz about Franzen's book lightly. In a series of tweets, she coins the hashtag #Franzenfreude.
6. Weiner is joined by Jodi Picoult; the two contend that book review sections pay negligible attention to commercial, popular fiction like they write. A conversation with them at the Huffington Post garners almost 400 comments in five days.
7. More reviews roll in: rich and nuanced; a masterpiece of American fiction; Franzen delivers the massive, old-school jams; very, very good; a complexly layered, richly imagined domestic tale; and big enough and thoughtful enough to engage and irritate an enormous number of readers.
8. The backlash begins. Newsweek -- by no coincidence, Time's rival -- writes of Franzen fatigue, saying, "There’s no getting around the fact that 'Freedom' comes with an ever-expanded set of baggage."
9. Weiner is hardly mollified. She appears on All Things Considered -- in an interview recorded earlier in the week -- defining her term: "Franzenfreude is taking pain in the multiple and copious reviews being showered on Jonathan Franzen."
10. So is this about a book or its coverage, or is it, to steal a phrase from Mel Brooks in "High Anxiety," a case of cultural pee-pee envy? That's the theory floated by Lizzie Skurnick at the Daily Beast. What's next? Maybe the drama will continue. Or maybe people will get the book today and, instead of talking about the buzz and counterbuzz, finally be able to discuss the novel itself.
-- Carolyn Kellogg
Websites linked to in this post: Time Magazine, the N.Y. Times, the L.A. Times, the Washington Post, NPR, Newsweek, Esquire, New York magazine, Salon.com, Mediabistro's Galleycat, the Millions, the Rumpus, the Huffington Post, USA Today and Farrar, Straus and Giroux