61 essential postmodern reads: an annotated list
The thing about postmodernism is it's impossible to pin down exactly what might make a book postmodern. In looking at the attributes of the essential postmodern reads, we found some were downright contradictory. Postmodern books have a reputation for being massive tomes, like David Foster Wallace's "Infinite Jest" -- but then there's "The Mezzanine" by Nicholson Baker, which has just 144 pages. And while postmodern books would, you'd think, have to be published after the modern period -- in the 20th or 21st centuries -- could postmodernism exist without "Tristram Shandy"? We think not.
Below is our list of the 61 essential reads of postmodern literature. It's annotated with the attributes below -- the author is a character, fiction and reality are blurred, the text includes fictional artifacts, such as letters, lyrics, even whole other books, and so on. And while this list owes much to George Ducker and David L. Ulin, you can address all complaints to me.
And now: The 61 essential postmodern reads!
Kathy Acker's "In Memorium to Identity"
Donald Antrim's "The Hundred Brothers"
Margaret Atwood's "The Blind Assassin"
Paul Auster's New York Trilogy
Nicholson Baker's "The Mezzanine"
J.G. Ballard's "The Atrocity Exhibition"
John Barth's "Giles Goat-Boy"
Donald Barthelme's "60 Stories"
John Berger's "G"
Thomas Bernhard's "The Loser"
Roberto BolaƱo's "2666"
Jorge Luis Borges' "Labyrinths"
William S. Burroughs' "Naked Lunch"
Robert Burton's "Anatomy of Melancholy"
Italo Calvino's "If on a Winter's Night a Traveler"
Julio Cortazar's "Hopscotch"
Robert Coover's "The Universal Baseball Association, Henry J. Waugh, Proprietor"
Stanley Crawford's "Log of the S.S. Mrs. Unguentine"
Mark Danielewski's "House of Leaves"
Don Delillo's "Great Jones Street"
Philip K. Dick's "The Man in the High Castle"
E.L. Doctorow's "City of God"
Geoff Dyer's "Out of Sheer Rage: Wrestling With D. H. Lawrence"
Umberto Eco's "The Mysterious Flame of Queen Loana"
Dave Eggers' "A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius"
Steve Erickson's "Tours of the Black Clock"
Percival Everett's "I Am Not Sidney Poitier"
William Faulkner's "Absalom! Absalom!"
Jonathan Safran Foer's "Everything Is Illuminated"
William Gaddis' "JR"
William Gass' "The Tunnel"
John Hawkes' "The Lime Twig"
Nathaniel Hawthorne's "The Scarlet Letter"
Aleksandar Hemon's "The Lazarus Project"
Michael Herr's "Dispatches"
Shelley Jackson's "Skin"
Franz Kafka's "Metamorphosis"
Milan Kundera's "The Book of Laughter and Forgetting"
Jonathan Lethem's "Motherless Brooklyn"
Ben Marcus' "Notable American Women"
David Markson's "Wittgenstein's Mistress"
Tom McCarthy's "Remainder"
Joseph McElroy's "Women and Men"
Steven Millhauser's "Edwin Mullhouse"
Haruki Murakami's "The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle"
Vladimir Nabokov's "Pale Fire"
Flann O'Brien's "At Swim-Two-Birds"
Tim O'Brien's "The Things They Carried"
Harvey Pekar's "American Splendor"
Thomas Pynchon's "Gravity's Rainbow"
Philip Roth's "The Counterlife"
W.G. Sebald's "The Rings of Saturn"
William Shakespeare's "Hamlet"
Gilbert Sorrentino's "Mulligan Stew"
Christopher Sorrentino's "Trance"
Art Spiegelman's Maus I & II
Laurence Stern's "The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy"
Scarlett Thomas' "PopCo"
Kurt Vonnegut's "Slaughterhouse Five"
David Foster Wallace's "Infinite Jest"
Colson Whitehead's "John Henry Days"
-- Carolyn Kellogg









Let me be the first to say, "What, no Becket?" "What, no Joyce?"
Posted by: John Shannon | July 16, 2009 at 03:04 PM
I'd add: 'Lake Wobegon Days': Author is a character, disrupts form (footnotes), includes fictional artifacts (the 95 theses against the Lutheran church), blurs reality and fiction (quasi-autobiograpical fic), includes historical falsehoods (extensive fake history of the town, put together from fictional artifacts. My memory's unclear, but pretty sure it overtly references other fictional works, too.
And a lot of the above elements are done as parody, which only adds to its postmodernism.
Posted by: whet moser | July 16, 2009 at 03:15 PM
I'd like to nominate Tristram Shandy (1759) and Orlando (1928) as the grandparents of this list. It'd be even better if there were a female contemporary of Sterne to nominate.
Posted by: Chris | July 16, 2009 at 05:08 PM
i agree with both comments, especially chris's!
Posted by: just10jay | July 16, 2009 at 06:00 PM
Various of William Vollmann's novels would fit happily into this list -- My nomination would be for Fathers and Crows, second in his Seven Dreams sequence. It meets most of the criteria above, excepting "thin."
Posted by: Tom Beshear | July 16, 2009 at 06:53 PM
A good list -- but missing two spectacular works:
1. Kazuo Ishiguro's "The Unconsoled."
2. Charles Palliser's "Betrayals."
Posted by: Kevin Jon Heller | July 16, 2009 at 09:20 PM
Tristram Shandy is probably the second post-modern of all time, but Don Quixote is almost certainly the first.
Posted by: JF | July 16, 2009 at 09:41 PM
Don Quixote. DQ was Post-Modern before there was a modern to be post.
Posted by: Will | July 16, 2009 at 09:51 PM
Lucian of Samosata's True History is a proto-post-modern work, in that the author is a character, it comments on its own bookishness, blurs reality and fiction, references other works, and contains historical falsehoods. And it's a lot of fun to read, too.
Posted by: Mitchell Glavas | July 16, 2009 at 10:15 PM
Wow. People may bicker, but nice list.
...
And as a Vollmann fan: "Wot? No Vollmann?"
Posted by: Mauer | July 16, 2009 at 10:34 PM
I don't really see the point of this random list. Also, where are Angela Carter, Ishmael Reed, Gunter Grass, Salman Rushdie, William Gibson and Samuel Delaney, amongst others?
Posted by: Darran | July 17, 2009 at 02:19 AM
That which consciously attempts to be pomo can't be pomo, as in the case of Eggers and Foer. That's simply called derivative. Your first 9 (out of 12) attributes merely define "metafictional" which is one frequent element of pomo, but not a necessary one. The last three are too broad to provide any sort of definition. And pomo is an approach, not a historical distinction.
Posted by: the mendoza line | July 17, 2009 at 04:31 AM
Kudos for including "The Loser" and "Hamlet!"
But these progenitors should be added:
Herman Melville, "Moby Dick"
Boris Pasternak, "Dr. Zhivago"
John Fowles, "The French Lieutenant's Woman"
Posted by: otolythe | July 17, 2009 at 05:00 AM
What about: Toni Morrison, Gunter Grass, Salman Rushdie, Jeanette Winterson... of all of the authors I read in a postmodern fiction course, the only ones here are Borges and Calvino.
Posted by: anonymous | July 17, 2009 at 07:03 AM
Rivka Galchen's "Atmospheric Disturbances"
Posted by: Alli Chase | July 17, 2009 at 07:25 AM
I second the inclusion of William Vollmann. I would add his "You Bright And Risen Angels".
Posted by: rtwomey | July 17, 2009 at 08:07 AM
the fact that so many people can cite so many examples of "pre-modern postmodern" reads begs a few questions about the popular use of the term "postmodern."
Posted by: stephen | July 17, 2009 at 08:12 AM
JR over The Recognitions and Motherless Brooklyn over The Fortress of Solitude--seriously?
Posted by: MBA | July 17, 2009 at 08:15 AM
No Joyce?
Posted by: Robert Harper | July 17, 2009 at 08:18 AM
No one's mentioned Naipaul yet: The Enigma of Arrival?
Posted by: Nicholas Laughlin | July 17, 2009 at 08:56 AM
I agree with the mendoza line; overall this is a perfectly fine list of good books to read, but hardly makes progress in defining "post-modern"; at best this is a random list of mostly famous books. Influenced by Giddens, I think "post-modernism" is best defined as a reaction to the modern. Can an author write a book in reaction to something that hasn't happened yet? Of course not, each author is telling a story using devices that they thought best and in doing so occasionally breaking out of the conventions of literature in their time. But then, now, in the "post-modern" period, if there is such a thing, an author like Eggers is working completely, and pretty unimaginatively, *within* convention. Better then to either have a list of contemporary fiction that defines "post modern" or a list of classical fiction that set the bar for rule-breaking; but this mish-mash is not particularly helpful
Posted by: Brian Weatherford | July 17, 2009 at 09:06 AM
Typo corrections in #1: In Memoriam with an a; and Laurence Strene has an e at the end.
I'm a Spanish/Comp Lit professor who covers much of this beat, and the list seems fine to me, with many of the additions of those who commented, and with one small beef: I'd like to hold the line between "modernism" and "post-modernism" with Joyce and Beckett (and Faulkner, and Morrison is not using post-modernist tricks in her more famous fiction). Having said that, Woolf's Orlando and the second half or so of Ulysses certainly do belong..
Posted by: PO'Connor | July 17, 2009 at 10:10 AM
Wikipedia has decent definitions of these things. John Barth tried in the 60s to define postmodernism in literature in two essays, and basically called in metafiction and magical realism. The metafiction part stuck, in part because Fredric Jameson uses it in his baggy book on postmodernism. I thought Lyotard's idea of post-modern literature (I like his definition of postmodernity) was unhelpful, just "even more difficult than the modernists," and that doesn't work for me.
Posted by: PO'Connor | July 17, 2009 at 10:21 AM
Wow! I better stick to Sci-Fi!
Posted by: Edward | July 17, 2009 at 10:39 AM
The other great precursor is surely Jan Potocki's "The Saragossa Manuscript."
Weird shortage of non-English/American authors in this list, not to mention women. No Virginia Woolf?
I would add:
Christine Brooke-Rose, "Amalgamemnon"
Anne Carson, "Autobiography of Red"
Georges Perec, "A Void"
Eduardo Galeano, "Memory of Fire" trilogy
Luther Blissett, "Q"
Wu Ming, "54"
Richard Flanagan, "Gould's Book of Fish"
Milorad Pavic, "Dictionary of the Khazars" (which comes in male and female editions)
Witold Gombrowicz, "Ferdydurke"
Erica Jong, "Fear of Flying" (maybe)
Instead of Maus or American Splendor, which are very straightforward narratives, I'd suggest Tom Phillips's "A Humument," which is a truly deconstructive postmodern visual intervention of a novel in a novel. Most graphic novels aren't very postmodern at all.
And if Kafka counts then add Bruno Schulz's "Street of Crocodiles" and Mikhail Bulgakov's "The Master and Maragarita."
I agree re including Joyce, Fowles, and maybe Melville and Faulkner, but probably not Beckett, who is a pure modernist, not violating the 4th wall, not critiquing the theatrical form, etc. (I'd add Peter Weiss instead, if a playwright is wanted, or Caryl Churchill.) Nor Hawthorne. Hawthorne?? If he's postmodern, then what's a classical novel? Only Dickens and Trollope, I guess.
I would not call Toni Morrison, Gunter Grass, Salman Rushdie, Jeanette Winterson, or VS Naipaul postmodern. All of them are fine modernists, skilled novelists with a strong sense of style and a balance between realism and stylization. Ditto Garcia-Marquez, who is sometimes called a postmodernist. I don't see any justification for including Hamlet in this list, though I might think of Twelfth Night or maybe the Tempest in this way, given the way they mess with time, space, and gender and have unreliable protagonists.
Posted by: Mal | July 17, 2009 at 12:11 PM
Henry Miller?
Posted by: gondwannabe | July 17, 2009 at 01:41 PM
Fine list! But really, not many non-English books in here... three Bs, a couple Cs, a couple Ks, Murakami, and Sebald? All great but it's mostly a U.S.Po.Mo. list, which is fine, if you call it that.
May I offer Dubravka Ugresic's "Steffie Cvek", a "patchwork novel" about a lovelorn secretary, as the world's greatest feminine and feminist pomo novel? It rips apart chicklit in the 80s before the term existed and sews it back together again, and it's hilarious. (Yellow star, Green puzzle piece, Brown book, Sideways a, Purple envelope, Pink waves, Cyan stack, Skinny "thin") Also the rewritten short stories in Ugresic's "Life Is a Fairy Tale." Full disclosure: both are in her book "Lend Me Your Character," co-translated by me (except for two stories entirely translated by M.H. Heim).
Also great: Dodie Bellamy's "Letters of Mina Harker" as in the character in Dracula. And I'd say the criminally underrated "The Winners" by Cortazar over "Hopscotch." Anyway, a very thought-provoking list, thanks!
Posted by: Damion | July 17, 2009 at 03:36 PM
Muriel Spark is the great unsung postmodernist - her novels play with author/character identity, reality/unreality and hilariious narrative hijinx. Try The Comforters or Memento Mori and see what she does better than many of the postmodernists on this list!
Posted by: Jim | July 17, 2009 at 04:52 PM
it seems as much a list of books written in the post modern period, as a list of postmodern novels. and as this list does not include finnegans wake, what is the point? disregarding the silly icons around the size of the books, we can see that the fine sank agnew has all the 'elements' required for this post modern lit list. plus it has a larf on very page.
Posted by: tombat | July 17, 2009 at 04:58 PM
Clearly James Joyce has been excluded from this list because its authors failed to read Finnegans Wake (and probably didn't finish Ulysses). That's OK though. As a Joycean, I would like to see Joyce banished from all lists of essential/canonical/influential books, as it seems he is only placed on these lists so that people can pretend they are being somehow rebellious when they say they haven't read him.
Posted by: EKSwitaj | July 17, 2009 at 10:34 PM
Simply not complete without Alasdair Gray's Lanark (1982). But then, incompleteness is a nicely postmodern trope.
I've often wondered whether a stylistic or rhetorical postmodernism (as distinct from a 'postmodern' period in cultural production) can be applied to literary texts in the same way as it's applied to, say, architecture, painting and the other plastic arts. Much of what we talk about when we talk about PoMo -- as those who've referenced Tristram Shandy and Don Quixote suggest -- has been part of fiction for as long as there has been fiction: self-referentiality, reflexivity, formal innovation, the deferral of signification, and so on.
It seems to me that, since language is always a potentially reflexive medium, the very means by which we comment on it - and on our deployment of it - that's not surprising. But it means the best we can do in defining postmodernism as a 'movement' (if it is one) is to offer this kind of taxonomies of family resemblance.
Posted by: James | July 18, 2009 at 03:18 AM
Interesting to see "Great Jones Street" listed. When published it received almost unanimously negative reviews, began generally regarded as a letdown after "End Zone." But in the last decade it's probably been the most written-about of DeLillo's pre-1980 books. (Amusing sidenote: several of the original reviewers thought that Bucky Wunderlick was based on Alice Cooper rather than Dylan.)
Posted by: Lawrence Tate | July 18, 2009 at 09:48 AM
Great job. Some excellent books on your list, but you can never get everybody's favorites, so you have created a good debate/dialogue.
Although spending too much time debating over something as murky and ambiguous over what is post-modern can be bad for your health. Just ask a literature grad student!
Posted by: Andrew | July 18, 2009 at 10:38 AM
The author is a character in Slaughterhouse Five, though a minor one.
Posted by: notmark | July 18, 2009 at 04:28 PM
Monica's Gang!
Posted by: Ricardo Sanchez | July 18, 2009 at 06:35 PM
Kurt Vonnegut is a character in Slaughterhouse Five.
Posted by: brian | July 18, 2009 at 07:42 PM
Only four out of the 61 authors listed are women. What's with that?
Posted by: Forestdweller | July 18, 2009 at 09:34 PM
'Possession' by AS Byatt is a wonderful pomo novel.
Posted by: Darcy Moore | July 19, 2009 at 04:40 AM
Do you hate women writers? No Toni Morrison?
Posted by: Annice | July 19, 2009 at 06:51 AM
The entry from Tim O'brien should be In the Lake of the Woods.
Posted by: Steve | July 19, 2009 at 11:42 AM
David Mitchell -- Cloud Atlas
Posted by: Pat | July 19, 2009 at 11:57 AM
only three female authors? ridiculous.
Posted by: Trish S | July 19, 2009 at 05:21 PM
Actually, if one includes "Maus" and "American Splendor", then "Watchmen" must surely be included in the list as well, as it meets more of the listed "requirements" than either of these. However, I would also note that this list is also westocentric and somewhat arbitrary in its assertion of "essentials," especially since you do not assert that this is a list of "novels" but "reads" - so where is the pomopoetry and pomo drama ("Angels in America" anyone?). Let's not be pomophobic when it comes to text...
Posted by: The Comedian | July 20, 2009 at 12:16 AM
61 essential reads? What happens to me if I don't read them all?
Posted by: Tracy W | July 20, 2009 at 02:18 AM
Stanley Elkin's The Living End and Stephen Dobyn's The Wrestler's Cruel Study (a truly wonderful and overlooked book), and Reuss' Horace, Afoot.
Posted by: Grant | July 20, 2009 at 10:29 AM
Surely, DeLillo's White Noise should be on the list?
And I agree that you need a Perec.
And there could be a case that Eggers is so self-aware that he's not aware. Pomo for sure.
Fun concept!
Posted by: Jeanne | July 20, 2009 at 03:45 PM
Nice to see Steve Erickson on this list. You could probably include everything he's written.
Posted by: thejamminjabber | July 21, 2009 at 04:06 AM
It's arguable whether Borges fits in, or is a progenitor.
And as for Stern, Cerventes, Joyce, Woolf, Shakespere, Kafka etc etc - it seems that all you folks are confusing pomo and experimentation/an eschewing of normalcy. Most of the tropes of 'pomo' can be found in modernist texts (Joyce being key there), and are often exaggerations of earlier tropes (cf Hamlets play-within-a-play, and much Sterne, Cervantes and Swift).
Posted by: Ross Brighton | July 21, 2009 at 04:35 AM
My writing is postmodern, I suppose, but I don't read much postmodern stuff. I like to read to things like Jane Austen and the Bible. Dictionaries. Books of information, like Insight Guides to foreign cities. Liner notes in CDs. The whole list of credits at the end of a film.
Posted by: David Grove | July 21, 2009 at 06:07 AM
All of this shows that the term postmodern is pretty meaningless, no indication of the kind of read one is going to have, and no indication of quality. You might as well just call this: titles of works you may find in a bookstore.
Posted by: sparky | July 21, 2009 at 09:42 AM