Jacket Copy

Books, authors and all things bookish

« Previous Post | Jacket Copy Home | Next Post »

Authors pick this world's most sci-fi cities

June 17, 2009 |  8:25 am

Reykjavik_0617
How is it possible that when Ursula K. LeGuin, China Miéville, Michael Moorcock and other writers were asked what real-life city -- on this world -- would be their choice for top science fiction or fantasy city, nobody said Los Angeles? Shouldn't our hodgepodge of cultures and languages, our massive size, funneling freeways, desert/mountain/seascape, sprawling ports and battle for clean air count for something? Did "Blade Runner" not make an impression?

Ah, not enough of one. Maybe they just haven't had time to visit.

Novelist Elizabeth Hand has a marvelous answer: She picks Reykjavík, Iceland.

It's more like an off-world colony than any place on Earth. Architecture that consists largely of corrugated metal and concrete (think Quonset huts), a dauntingly inhospitable landscape -- lava flows, cliffs, glaciers, hot springs, immense waterfalls. Very few trees -- the vegetation in places consists largely of lichen or moss, with grass in the central areas and some stunted birch or conifers. Only one indigenous mammal, the arctic fox, though a handful of others have been introduced; overall, quite a small biomass though tons of birds. Fewer insects than anywhere else, excepting maybe the Antarctic. Combine that with a vibrant (well, maybe not so vibrant since the country went bankrupt), highly educated populace (highest literacy rates on the planet) and a huge proportion of cutting edge artists/musicians/writers, and you have a place that resembles Samuel R. Delany's Triton (Trouble on Triton) in real life.


The question was asked by the folks behind Shared Worlds, a two-week summer program in science fiction and fantasy for teens held at Wofford College in South Carolina.

-- Carolyn Kellogg

Photo: Reykjavík from the air. Credit: will_hybrid via Flickr


Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments

If Blade Runner made an impression, it would have to be the wrong one. The L.A. of Blade Runner is the planner's dream; the one of today is much less visibly dense or pedestrianized, much less influenced by the mega-cities of the Pacific Rim, and much less Bradbury Building.

For the reasons you list, we're a defensibly sci-fi city. But not because we're like Blade Runner.



Advertisement


Recent Posts
Publishing from the grave, Michael Crichton style |  November 25, 2009, 5:05 pm »
How far will our memoir fascination go? |  November 25, 2009, 10:38 am »
Is there a story in California City? |  November 25, 2009, 8:12 am »
Serving poetry with your pumpkin pie |  November 24, 2009, 11:50 am »



Archives