L.A. at Home

Design, Architecture, Gardens,
Southern California Living

« Previous Post | L.A. at Home Home | Next Post »

What we're reading: Core 77 on mutant Eames chair

Picnik collage

That sound you just heard may be Charles and Ray Eames swiveling in their final resting places. Hats off to the generally knowledgeable industrial design website Core 77 for pointing out these grotesque versions of the classic Eames 670 lounger. According to an Aug. 17 post by Core Jr, these puffy pieces are sculptor Mark Wentzel's way of "alluding to topics of global obesity and consumption, and the potential cooperation among artists, designers, scientists and manufacturers to address such issues."  

Oh, so that explains it. Viewed from the front, the chairs do indeed take on the appearance of overstuffed body parts. I get it. But I reckon the imaginative yet ever-practical Mr. and Mrs. Eames, who introduced the classic chair in a 1956 NBC program (see the video after the jump), would have been amazed and amused to hear Wentzel's work being called "a fruitful overlap between art and design ... borrowed directly from the historical and cultural narrative of the Eames lounge ... evoking its particular typification of enduring, desirable and mass-produced products."

I'd call it an overly generous assessment of beautiful furniture gone horribly wrong for art's sake. What do you think?

Stick with the video, past the images of the Eames house in Pacific Palisades, to see the classic film that Charles and Ray made showing how the chair gets put together.

-- David A. Keeps

Photos: markwentzel.com

Video: NBC/YouTube
 
Comments () | Archives (4)

The comments to this entry are closed.

I have to agree with you... a project gone horribly wrong. It's one of those "what were they thinking" moments, I think.

Mark Wenzel, I think you ought to know better than to use the phrase "Global obesity." America does not equal the globe, and most of the population of this planet is not obese. But I love the furniture! It's time people here, in America, see how unlovely we've become.

it's not furniture if you can't sit on it. I'm not even sure I'd call it art.

I think it's brilliant! It's not critical of obesity or overweight people. If you think that - well, you just don't get it I suppose. It's a loose critique of consumption in 'our society' - of those who MUST HAVE that Eames or Aalto piece to feel entitled, etc ... right?


Connect

Recommended on Facebook


Advertisement

L.A. at Home in Print

In Case You Missed It...

Hot Property

Video

Recent Posts
New home for L.A. at Home |  July 17, 2012, 3:45 pm »
The Scout: What's new on Pico Boulevard  |  July 13, 2012, 8:22 am »
Review: Insteon remote-control LED light bulb |  July 10, 2012, 8:28 am »

Categories


Archives