Hero Complex

For your inner fanboy

Category: J.R.R. Tolkien

Ian McKellen surrounded by evil mutants on 'The View'

November 9, 2009 | 10:58 am

I wish that, just for a moment, Ian McKellen actually possessed some of those nature-bending powers that he wielded in the "Lord of the Rings" and "X-Men" films because it would have been a delight to see him turn the set of "The View" into a charred crater.

The esteemed 70-year-old thespian was a guest on the ABC daytime show last week and the footage is excruciating to watch. I have to say I didn't know much about this show beyond its reputation for shrill banality but, after watching this, I'm discouraged by the fact that this a nationally aired show. (Thanks by the way to Jay West for sending me the link.)

McKellen was on to promote "The Prisoner," the new six-episode AMC series that begins Nov. 15, but he was met with a quartet of hosts who had their own flaky agendas. One of them had snippy and random things to say about British healthcare, which she obviously knows nothing about. Another asked McKellen: "Do you think you're creepy?" and later gushed about his film performance as "Mag-Netto." Must be a big fan. And then (at the 4-minute mark) the million-dollar question from a croaky Whoopi Goldberg: "Now, are you coming back to 'Harry Potter'?" Uhhh...

McKellen, who has never been to Hogwarts, said that he expects that he will be back as Gandalf in "The Hobbit" films but added that he doesn't have a contract yet and, with a small aside about that, hinted that the dealings might not be a slam dunk. He also pointed out with some good cheer that after he went public as a gay actor his film career took off, which runs counter to traditional Hollywood career wisdom. Did anyone on the show sense that there might an interesting follow-up question on one of these points? Nope. Goldberg thought it better to ask if there would be any black Hobbits in the new movies. Oh, right, well, there you go. 

All this reminds me of an old saying: You know the worst part of having your head up your own backside? "The View." 

-- Geoff Boucher

RECENT AND RELATED 

Lotr Can "The Hobbit" escape the "Rings" shadow?

"The Hobbit" is just the beginning of del Toro Decade

Bryan Singer flirts with "X-Men" return 

Ian McKellen and Patrick Stewart in "Godot"

Daniel Radcliffe as Bilbo? Star says thanks but no

Del Toro will take Disney on a scary ride

Peter Jackson: Fans are "fed up with the lack of original ideas"

Photo: Ian McKellen as Gandalf (not Dumbledore). Credit: New Line 


READER POLL: 'The Hobbit' will triumph but 'X-Men' and 'Pirates' franchises should quit now

October 12, 2009 |  9:43 am

FOUR FRANCHISES AT A CROSSROADS

Franchises 

Talk about heroic: Four film franchises, one decade, more than $10 billion worth of theater tickets sold.

And more than that, in their very best moments, each of these franchises shown above delivered sparkling adventure and escapism for moviegoers. Now, though, with the decade winding down and all four franchises sitting a nice tidy trilogy, the question must be asked: Isn't three the magic number? Do we really need a fourth movie from any of these aging popcorn enterprises? Clearly, all of them will be written up in the Hollywood history books but right now the indelicate must be asked: "How can we miss you if you won't leave?"

Last week we gave you an in-depth report on this quartet of mega-franchises and their quests for a fourth visit to theaters. We told you how "The Hobbit" must escape the the towering shadow of "The Lord of the Rings," while Sam Raimi's "Spider-Man" series needs to get back to its roots to thrive. We also explained that the "X-Men" future looks especially uncertain while the "Pirates of the Caribbean" franchise might be facing a one-man mutiny with Johnny Depp's distress over recent changes at Disney.

We also put the question to you: Which of these franchises is making a mistake by adding a fourth film?

You made it clear that "The Hobbit," with director Guillermo del Toro taking over with a new vision, is in a class by itself -- the other franchises may tack on new editions to cash in, but fans are expecting nothing but magic from Del Toro's arrival in Middle-earth. The remaining three franchises got a frostier reception. For five days last week, more than half of our reader voters named "Pirates" as the cinematic series that should walk the plank. Over the weekend that changed and (with a lot of late-arriving Depp fans?) the surging "X-Men" became the top choice as a franchise hitting bottom.

It's not too late, though, we'll take votes for the next 48 hours before declaring our, uh, winning loser. In the meantime, thanks for reading, commenting and voting.

-- Geoff Boucher

  

VOTE: WHICH FRANCHISE IS MAKING A MISTAKE WITH A FOURTH FILM?

   

RECENT AND RELATED

Sam Raimi weaves a tangled web Sam Raimi's Spider-Man regrets: "I would have done everything differently"

Surprised author Tim Powers finds himself aboard "Pirates" ship

Depp: "There's a crack in my enthusiasm" for "Pirates" 4

Peter Jackson: Movie fans are "fed up with the lack of original ideas"

"The Hobbit" is just the beginning of the del Toro Decade

Daniel Radcliffe as Bilbo Baggins? "Potter" stars says thanks but no

Hugh Jackman says there's a lot of Mike Tyson in Wolverine

Photos at top, from left, Ian McKellen in "Lord of the Rings," Tobey Maguire in "Spider-Man," Halle Berry in "X-Men: The Last Stand" and Johnny Depp in "Pirates of the Caribbean."  Credits from left: New Line Cinema, Sony Pictures, 20th Century Fox, Walt Disney Studios. Bottom photo of Sam Raimi by Ken Hively / Los Angeles Times


Four major franchises look to make a fourth film -- but should they? [Updated]

October 5, 2009 |  7:04 am

Franchises

They are four of the biggest franchises in Hollywood history and each is at a major crossroads. This week the Hero Complex will look at "The Lord of the Rings," "Spider-Man," "X-Men" and "Pirates of the Caribbean" and size up their future as they attempt to move past their original trilogies and into a new decade.

Tuesday "Lord of the Rings/The Hobbit": How can Guillermo del Toro possibly match up to Peter Jackson's magical conquests ($2.92 billion in global box office and 17 Oscars including best picture, best director and best adapted screenplay)? At least he has Jackson on his side ...

Wednesday "Spider-Man": Director Sam Raimi and stars Tobey Maguire and Kirsten Dunst are back for more and that's no surprise considering "Spider-Man 3" had the highest-grossing opening weekend of the wall-crawling films -- and went on to make $891 million worldwide. Still, the last film got decidedly mixed reviews, and some fans are wondering if the magic is gone.

Thursday: "X-Men": The summer 2000 release of Bryan Singer's "X-Men" truly signaled the beginning of the modern era of superhero cinema and its new ambitions. While the 2006 release of "X-Men: The Last Stand" led to commercial success ($459 million), the hero-snuffing plot, the finality of the title and those cruel reviews all suggested the run was over. Now, though, producers are looking for a return to the mutant chronicles...

Friday "Pirates of the Caribbean" : The fourth film, "Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides," hits theaters in 2011, but after a shake-up at the top of Walt Disney Studios, star Johnny Depp said he is feeling glum about the project. If he's not excited, should you be?

Check back to read them all, but in the meantime, give us your opinion: Which franchise would be making the biggest mistake by continuing past the original trilogy? Vote below ...

-- Geoff Boucher

Photos from left, Ian McKellen in "Lord of the Rings," Tobey Maguire in "Spider-Man," Halle Berry in "X-Men: The Last Stand" and Johnny Depp in "Pirates of the Caribbean."  Credits from left: New Line Cinema, Sony Pictures, 20th Century Fox, Walt Disney Studios.

UPDATED: Previous version of this post had an incorrect year of release on one of the X-films.


Prepare for the Guillermo del Toro decade: 'The Hobbit' director is just getting started

July 1, 2009 |  7:50 am

One of the gentle souls in the movie business is Guillermo del Toro, and I always look forward to my interviews with him. This is a longer version of my latest story on Del Toro, which is scheduled to run Thursday on the cover of the Los Angeles Times Calender section. 

The Hobbit Fantasy and horror fans, prepare yourself for the Decade of Del Toro.

On the far side of the globe, in New Zealand, filmmaker Guillermo del Toro is now in his seventh month of labor on “The Hobbit,” a $300-million epic that will be told over two films in 2011 and 2012. But you can also find the Guadalajara native on the shelf of your local bookstore with his just-released debut novel, “The Strain,” the opening installment of a vampire trilogy he already has mapped out.

That’s only the beginning. The 44-year-old Del Toro, who was nominated for an Oscar for the dark fairy tale “Pan’s Labyrinth” and showed his crowd-pleasing sensibilities with the “Hellboy” films, also has plans to reanimate some musty and monstrous literary classics. He plans to make a “Frankenstein” film as well as an adaptation of  H.P. Lovecraft’s epic “At the Mountains of Madness,” a project he breathlessly refers to as “my obsession.”

He would seem to be a full plate but, interviewed by phone recently, he chuckled and added another project to the pile: “I think after ‘The Hobbit,’ my next project may actually turn out to be ‘Drood,’ ” he said, referring to the 2008 novel by Dan Simmons that presents Charles Dickens at the center of an occult mystery in 1860s Victorian London. Those three post-“Hobbit” projects are all for Universal, which also has hopes that Del Toro will continue his library-card approach to filmmaking by taking on “Slaughterhouse-Five,” Kurt Vonnegut’s surreal antiwar tale of time travel.

If you’re keeping track, that would have Del Toro tied up well past 2015 and perhaps into 2017. He also is  flirting with several other projects (“Pinocchio,” “Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde” and a third “Hellboy” film have Drood been mentioned at various times) but perhaps only as a producer,  as with the acclaimed 2007 Spanish ghost story, “The Orphanage.” He also wants to write more novels and to join in the increasingly popular quest to discover the land of interactive 21st century storytelling, which lies somewhere between Hollywood films and video games as we know them today.

It’s a dizzying career plan for the father of two (his wife and daughters have moved to New Zealand for “The Hobbit”), but in conversation, it’s clear the cheerful storyteller is motivated by his humble, lifelong passion for genre entertainment – he wants to visit the worlds of Tolkien and Shelley, not take them over.

“I love what I do and I feel honored to do it, quite honestly,” Del Toro said.

Right now, no venture has him more enthused than “The Strain,” the 401-page novel that was co-written with Chuck Hogan and released in hardcover this month by William Morrow. The book has gotten generally good reviews (and peer blurbs, too, with novelist Clive Cussler gushing that it “soars with spellbinding intrigue”) and fulfills the earliest ambition of Del Toro. As a boy in Mexico, he  dreamed of being an author long before filmmaking captured his heart. He already has found one major benefit of being a novelist – the absence of Hollywood machinations.

“I have written or co-written 15 screenplays and I have only seven movies,” said Del Toro. The strain “I find it frustrating when you write a screenplay and it lives, but you don’t get it produced – which is a lottery – it exists in a limbo that does not allow it to become public. A filmmaker will never be known by the movies he left in the drawer. Unlike a musician, a painter or a poet, nobody is going to open a box after I’m gone and say, ‘Oh, look, another great movie that he didn’t make.’ ”

“The Strain” presents an unsettling tale of a vampiric virus on the loose in New York City. It was about four years ago that the story started taking shape in Del Toro’s imagination and his inspiration was a surprising one.

“I was watching ‘The Wire’ on cable and I was addicted to it,” the filmmaker said. “I really felt caught up in this idea of doing a procedural, a limited cable series, which married the ideas of biology, of anatomy, of vampirism and evolved through the seasons into the spiritual and mythological aspects of the theme – and always with the everyday details and prosaic settings, and the rhythms of a procedural.”

The plan at first was to present “The Strain” as a television series, limited to three seasons, and Del Toro was gripped with excitement as he got deeper into the tale.

“I prepared a ‘bible’ of the three seasons and went to the network that I had a deal with, which was Fox. They read the bible and listened to the pitch with the opening scene of the 747 stopping mysteriously on the runway at JFK and the mystery that followed, and I was very happy with it.”

And how did the network respond? “They said two things: It’s too expensive, first of all, and what we would really love is a vampire comedy. That was my first and only encounter with television. I retreated quickly.”

Fox later aired a somewhat similar sequence to the airport tarmac scene that opens “The Strain” with the series premiere last year of “Fringe,” the science fiction show from the team of J.J. Abrams, Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman (the same collective behind this summer’s “Star Trek”). Was that more than a coincidence?

“Knowing J.J.’s imagination — and perverse imagination — I can only chalk it up to the fact that we all seem to walk on a thin line of ideas, one after the other,” Del Toro said. “But when it first was raised, when I heard how ‘Fringe’ opened, I did get a jolt of recognition. Que sera, sera.”

Guillermo del Toro gets a grip Ever the horror scholar, Del Toro said he drew inspiration from Bram Stoker’s “Dracula” but not in the predictable cape-and-fangs way.

“I was trying to re-create the spirit of Stoker’s ‘Dracula’ back in the time it was written,” Del Toro said. “And what I mean is it was a very procedural novel. It was an epistolary novel – it was all written in letters, documents and recordings. It utilized cutting-edge technology for the time with typewriters and voice recorders. It was very much supposed to be ‘on right now’ for readers except now it’s  contemplated as a classic. At the time, it was a very vibrant, almost Michael Crichton approach to the theme. It was a marriage of the old European lore and the modern.”

There’s a surge in vampires in pop culture right now, a sort of crimson wave of interest, with “True Blood” pumping up the ratings on HBO and a second “Twilight” film due later this year. The Swedish bloodsucking romance “Let the Right One In” was a hit at the Tribeca Film Festival last year, and an English-language version will be released next year. There’s also talk of film revivals for both “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” and “Dark Shadows.”  And, on cable and home video, “30 Days of Night” and the “Underworld” films are still in circulation, while bookstores have replaced their “Harry Potter” sales with the melodramatic swoon of Stephenie Meyer’s “Twilight” titles.

“They never go away, it’s a staple in human imagination – the idea of the self-consuming, cannibalistic monster,” Del Toro said. “The consumption of our essence by a human monster lends itself to so many variations. The romantic vampire is right at the Big Bang of the myth in literature. And so is the brutal depiction of the undead corpse that needs to feed, which is the most horrifying one. The romantic one is Slaughterhouse-Five perfectly valid and has produced really good pieces, but that’s not the one I was hooked on as a kid. I was hooked on the idea of an undead creature inhabited by an eternal spirit that hungers for your life. That scared the bejesus out of me.”

The vampires of “The Strain” are no emo pretty boys, not with skin that, on close inspection, reminds one young human character of a “pickled pig fetus” he saw back in science class.

“That’s a scene from the second novel,” Del Toro said with a satisfied giggle. "The idea is to keep reminding people that these are undead things. To start with biology and then also help the audience make sense of all the vampire traits that they already know.”

Don’t expect to see “The Strain” as a film series at any point – Del Toro said it’s not just written for that sort of storytelling — but he is intrigued by the idea of a pay cable series if that ever presents itself. Wouldn’t that be treading too close to the Louisiana turf of “True Blood”? That doesn’t seem to bother Del Toro, and considering his career bravery, that’s no surprise. 

In nine months, he will begin shooting “The Hobbit,” and all he has to do is match the Tolkien achievement of Peter Jackson, the “Lord of the Rings” director whose three films pulled in more than $2.9 billion at the box office worldwide and collected 17 Oscars, including one for best picture and another for director. (Jackson is back as producer on “The Hobbit” and said last year that he “cannot think of a more inspired filmmaker to take the journey back to Middle-earth.”)

Del Toro’s future projects also will be judged against potent history. Vonnegut used the word “flawless” when talking about director George Roy Hill’s 1972 adaptation of “Slaughterhouse,” and recent revivals of Dr. Frankenstein’s patchwork man (“Van Helsing” and the Kenneth Branagh-directed “Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein”) haven’t stirred moviegoers or come close to the towering 1930s work of Boris Karloff and director James Whale.

Frankenstein 1831

“Everything I’m working on is something I love,” Del Toro said of his deep list of projects. “On ‘Frankenstein,’ I think my version would be unique. People forget that Shelley’s creature was an undead mass of flesh and bone. It’s unholy and lumbering not because it wants to be a monster but because it once had a soul and is now looking for it. It’s a profound mediation of man abandoned by his creator in a world he doesn’t understand. It has rarely been explored as such on film. The novel has not been filmed, in my opinion, and I have a very concrete approach, but it would ruin it of I told you.

"I also love this novel ‘Drood’ that deals with Dickens in a very strange way and his relationship with [fellow author] Wilke Collins, and it uses a resource that is used beautifully in literature by people such as Nabakov but it is not very often in film, which is the unreliable narrator.”  

As for “The Hobbit,” Del Toro is in the midst of intense pre-production, doing work with models, script pages, set blueprints and thousands of decisions on details.

Asked about the film and what he wants to avoid with it, Del Toro said: “What I want to do is make the best movie I have ever done. What I want to avoid is to make some fastidious tracing of lines that were established by the ‘Lord of the Rings’ trilogy. We’re trying to be respectful of it, and what was shown in the trilogy is canon, but we are gleefully exploring new creatures, new set pieces, new territory and new avenues.

"As with everything, there is always something new to get excited about.”

-- Geoff Boucher

RECENT AND RELATED

Neil Gaiman

Neil Gaiman dreams: "A Sandman movie is an inevitability"

Del Toro: Swamp Thing among the last "Holy Grail" projects

H.P. Lovecraft and Hollywood, an unholy alliance?

Guillermo del Toro signs "The Strain" in Hollywood

Tim Burton explains his dark hopes for "Alice" and Johnny Depp

A travesty: Tolkien's family made zero off of "Rings" trilogy

VIDEO: Looking back in horror: A Lon Chaney retrospective

"Exorcist" director Friedkin lists the 13 scariest movies ever

2009 Horror Preview: Wes Craven on the "inheritance of violence"

"Black Lagoon" and "Frankenstein" among 13 planned remakes

Photo, above: Guillermo Del Toro with "Hellboy" hand. Credit: Egon Endrenyi / Universal Pictures.

Photo at bottom: : Neil Gaiman.  Credit: Jennifer S. Altman / For The Times


Everyday Hero headlines: 'Lord of the Rings,' Daniel Craig and 'Thor,' 'Conan' on film

October 20, 2008 |  3:17 pm

Jrr_tolkien_photogrpahed_by_bille_3It's a big day for fans of "The Lord of the Rings." On this day in 1955, the third book, "The Return of the King," was published, bringing to a close the masterwork by J.R.R. Tolkien (whom you see here in a photograph by Billett Potter).

Today also happens to be the 50th birthday of Viggo Mortensen, who was a last-minute replacement for actor Stuart Townsend in the role of Aragon. The role has been a massive career boost for Mortensen but it almost didn't happen: The New York state native has said he wouldn't have taken the role if his son hadn't been such a fan of the books.

Now, on with today's handpicked fanboy headlines ...

Thor_logo_3 No deal could be hammered out: "Quantum of Solace" star Daniel Craig confirms that he was indeed offered the role of the Norse God of Thunder in Marvel's upcoming "Thor" film adaptation, but that he decided it just wasn't right for him. [IESB]   

Green_hornet_logo_2 Remember when Seth Rogen was telling people that "The Green Hornet" wouldn't be a comedy? Well, things change, especially when you have Stephen Chow as Kato. Rogen nows tells Devin Faraci: "We have one rule when writing, and that's don't get attached to anything. One day we want to make a serious film and then Stephen Chow comes in with a good idea and we're like, 'Well it's funny.' Should we not do it because we originally wanted to do a serious film? We come from, 'Nah ... we'll just take the idea that seems good.' So it's definitely less serious than a serious film, that's for sure." [CHUD]

Batman_logo_2Are John McCain and Barack Obama engaging in Gotham-style politics? David Sarno thinks so, playfully citing a scene from the old "Batman" series featuring the hero in a mayoral debate with the Penguin: "The clip, first uploaded in early 2007, has been picked up by several political commentators and compared to recent debates between Senators John McCain and Barack Obama. Besides being an amusing clip on its own -- the great Burgess Meredith turns in a virtuoso performance as the Bilious Bird -- viewers have noted some chuckle-worthy parallels..." [Web Scout]

Jules_feiffer_2David Kamp reviews "Explainers," which collects Jules Feiffer's cartoons for the Village Voice  from the 1956 through 1966. "The material may show some age, but from the get-go Feiffer’s visual style was assured and bracingly modern: his figures eloquently but sparely drawn (with a thin wooden dowel dipped in ink, not a pen), and no background illustration, just white space. While the strip continued to plumb topical themes as it progressed — Lyndon Johnson, Barry Goldwater and William F. Buckley Jr. all make appearances in “Explainers” — Feiffer became a nimbler satirist, hitting upon several recurring setups and characters that would transcend their atomic-age origins." [New York times Sunday Book Review]

Conan_the_barbarian_dark_horseIs Brett Ratner directing a Conan film? That's what Moriarity reports with considerable chagrin: "Oh, Brett ... why do you want to hurt me? Why do you want to make this movie? Please, please, please tell me it’s because you have a genuine passion for the material and not just because it’s a start date and a financing package that’s ready to go. Please tell me that you really care about the character and its history, and not that it’s just 'Hey, I recognize that name.'" [Ain't It Cool News] ... and, in related news, Ratner met a gorilla in a tutu and, no, it wasn't Kelsey Grammer in his costume from "X-Men: the Last Stand." [Dish Rag]

Indian_flag Priyanko Sarkar analyzes the graphic novel and its standing in India, where the work of Sarnath Banerjee, Orijit Sen and Amruta Patil has stirred interest but the scene has not found enough quality art to match its quality words. "Sadly, bad illustrators are breaking the spine of the genre in India. But that is just one of the challenges facing the Indian graphic market genre.... Other impediments: the packaging of graphic novels, finding people to work on the genre and getting retailers to accept it." [Times of India]

-- Geoff Boucher

Jules Feiffer cartoon courtesy of Fantagraphics; Conan image courtesy of Dark Horse.



Advertisement

About the Bloggers

Recent Posts


Categories


Archives