Blown-out BP well finally killed at bottom of Gulf of Mexico [Updated]
[Updated at 8:57 a.m.: The BP oil well in the Gulf of Mexico -- source of the largest offshore oil spill in U.S. history -- has been permanently killed, a top federal official announced Sunday.
Thad Allen, the federal spill response chief, said pressure tests confirmed that BP's effort to intersect the well and plug it with cement nearly 18,000 feet below the ocean surface had proved successful.
"With this development, which has been confirmed by the Department of the Interior's Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, we can finally announce that the Macondo 252 well is effectively dead," Allen said in a statement. "Additional regulatory steps will be undertaken, but we can now state, definitively, that the Macondo well poses no continuing threat to the Gulf of Mexico.
"From the beginning, this response has been driven by the best science and engineering available. We insisted that BP develop robust redundancy measures to ensure that each step was part of a deliberate plan, driven by science, minimizing risk to ensure we did not inflict additional harm in our efforts to kill the well. I commend the response personnel, both from the government and private sectors, for seeing this vital procedure through to the end. And although the well is now dead, we remain committed to continue aggressive efforts to clean up any additional oil we may see going forward."]
The gush of oil from the damaged well spewed 205 million gallons until engineers affixed a cap to the well in July.
The disaster, which began five months ago after an explosion sank a drilling rig, closed fisheries in the Gulf of Mexico, sidelining workers and dealing a heavy blow to the seafood industry and beach towns from Louisiana to Florida. It is blamed for the deaths of at least 5,939 birds, 584 sea turtles and more than 60 dolphins, although scientists believe the hidden toll is much higher.
The spill also led to a moratorium on deep-water drilling that has been the subject of court battles and political fighting between the Obama administration and largely Republican elected officials along the gulf and elsewhere.
BP’s market value plummeted; as of Sept. 17, the oil giant had shed 34% of its market capitalization compared with its December 2009 value. BP estimates it has spent more than $6 billion on cleanup and compensation, over and above the $20 billion it has promised for an escrow fund to compensate for economic damages.
At its height, the cleanup effort involved thousands of vessels and tens of thousands of workers deployed in four states. A mixture of Louisiana light crude from the well and chemicals used to disperse it soiled 966 miles of shoreline.
Of the 4.9 million barrels of oil that gushed from the well, 25% was burned, skimmed or piped to tanker ships, according to an August report released by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
An additional 25% has evaporated or dissolved, while a separate 25%, which the government calls “residual” oil, made its way into the ocean as a light sheen on the water or as tar balls.
The remaining 25% is believed to be deep below the surface of the gulf in vast clouds of atomized droplets that could alter links in the chain of sea life that scientists are only beginning to understand.
This “dispersed” oil was broken into droplets by the 1.8 million gallons of the chemical dispersant Corexit, which was sprayed on the ocean's surface and deep under the sea.
A massive federal effort to map and study these plumes, some of which are 1,200 to more than 4,000 feet below the surface, is underway.
-- Richard Fausset
The Associated Press contributed to this report.








Actually some of the strongest voices against the "moratorium" have been Louisiana Democrats Mary Landrieu, Lt Governor Scott Angelle, and Rep Charles Melancon who is going up against David Vitter for the US Senate Seat this year. While Governor Jindal has been public in opposition its been Landrieu and Angelle who have been some of the loudest voices. The LATimes has done a good job on the story but that is either irresponsible reporting or biased...
Posted by: Mark Fields | September 19, 2010 at 06:49 PM
Well then I guess the millions of gallons of oil under the water and the millions of gallons of toxic dispersant (Corexit 9500) have somehow been 'killed' also.
Or maybe the sea organisms that eat oil somehow also developed a taste for the Corexit and are thriving as never before.
Kinda gives you a warm feeling all over--but then again that might just be a side effect of the dispersant. Might want to keep an eye on where that next batch of shrimp and fish come from that you're serving your family.
Posted by: karma2 | September 19, 2010 at 04:03 PM
The present administration of California favors gasoline over ethanol. There are several major gasoline refineries in Los Angeles. One business that produced ethanol in California is bankrupt. California officials said that ethanol should be further developed so it can leave less of an environmental footprint. Petrol fuel leaves its footprint beneath the strata of the coasts and seabed and its residue from vehicle fallout eventually contaminates water and food supplies. I had hoped for the oil companies to begin a gradual transition into ethanol fuel production like E-85 almost forty years ago. Some cities in the U S use only E-85 for their government vehicles that has 85 percent ethanol. There could be more ethanol pump stations available today that are domestically available without foreign dependence on oil, but only smaller energy companies produce it. Oil companies incorporate about six percent ethanol in gasoline. The oil companies have consistently made large annual profits upward of the billions of dollars. The impact to employment and revenues for the state of California would not be adversely affected by the phasing in of ethanol production by the oil companies. It would be a contribution by the oil companies to assist California in its goals to substantially reduce green house emissions and creating new jobs. BP could produce a fuel like E-85 with a smaller environmental footprint. Its resources for fuel are largely overseas. Those resources could be vegetables for ethanol production obtained from U S farms near coastal scrub lands or parched deserts of the Southwest, also from contracted farms in the interior valley farmlands. There are wild plants that can be cultivated for fuel use that barely need irrigation.
Posted by: byetheway77 | September 19, 2010 at 12:02 PM
Huh, no mention that it was Hallibuton that did the cementing.
Posted by: Philip Andrews | September 19, 2010 at 10:41 AM
This took long enough. Something that could of been solved months ago. I guess BP couldnt find a way to temporary seal it and still get the oil out
Posted by: Ken | September 19, 2010 at 10:41 AM
What Retired Admiral Thad actually stated - In common speak.
'I have not the foggiest what BP, our Government or any other Contractor has done to 'Kill' this well. But in order to appease my Superiors, get BP back to oil production in the Gulf as well as all other similar contractors on hold now, I will stick my neck out and tell Y'all, the Well is dead, (Killed), and everything is fine and dandy again....Nothing more to see here now, you all can go home now!
Three weeks from now - A small article found in the LAT Washington section - Retired Admiral Thad...has moved to Belize with his family permanently for health reasons.
Posted by: imacobru | September 19, 2010 at 09:59 AM