Air quality at hazardous levels in foothill cities
The Angeles National Forest fire has reduced air quality to hazardous
levels in foothill communities in the San Gabriel and San Fernando
valleys, officials say.
The cities of Altadena, La Cañada Flintridge and La Crescenta are directly affected by the smoke, as are the Los Angeles communities of Tujunga and Sunland.
The area Sunday recorded an air Quality index of 398. Anything above 100 is considered unhealthful, officials said.
"It's been a long time since we've recorded an [index] of this high a level," said Sam Atwood, spokesman for the South Coast Air Quality Management District.
Dense smoke tends to settle into valleys when there is no wind. Some of the smoke was expected to be swept into the mountains by ocean breezes this morning, Atwood said.
"It's really time for people with heart and lung disease -- bronchitis, asthma, emphysema -- to think about leaving to a less smoky area," Atwood said.
-- Corina Knoll
Photo: Jennifer DeLeon of Littlerock works
to keep a mask on the face of her 8-month-old daughter, Emily Magana,
as they prepare to board the 206 Metrolink Train at the Vincent
Grade-Acton Station early Monday morning for a doctor's appointment in
downtown Los Angeles. The mask was provided by a Metrolink supervisor.
Credit: Al Seib / Los Angeles Times








Today is Sept 2, 2009 and the air quality is still very poor. Kudos to the 4,100 plus firefighters working on the Station Fire -- thank you for protecting our community!!!
Dr Reese Halter is a conservation biologist, TV host and author
http://DrReese.wordpress.com
Posted by: Dr Reese Halter | September 02, 2009 at 08:27 PM
It is frustrating how difficult it is to get clear, consistent and timely information about the air quality in Los Angeles, especially from the Southern California AQMD page itself. Why isn't there an easy way for people living in the middle of this unhealthy situation to check on the air quality in a timely manner? The AQMD page for Los Angeles is difficult to find, read, and is consistently a day behind. Not exactly helpful if one wants to be proactive about taking care of their lungs. It was the same way two years ago when Griffith Park was burning. Hard to believe the consistently poor reporting is not some intentional and misguided attempt to protect tourism, or who knows what?
Posted by: Mary Holmes | September 01, 2009 at 06:42 AM
What's the air quality like in Pacific Palisades?
Posted by: Blair | August 31, 2009 at 10:32 AM