Greenspace

Environmental news from California and beyond

« Previous Post | Greenspace Home | Next Post »

Sarah Palin vs. the endangered beluga whales

October 17, 2008 |  2:51 pm

Belugawhale

A small, isolated population of beluga whales in the Cook Inlet, Alaska, was granted federal protection as an endangered species, the National Marine Fisheries Service announced today.

The decision came over the objections of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and other supporters of the proposed Knik Arm Bridge that would cross the inlet, connecting Anchorage to its northern suburbs.

"This $600-million project is perhaps the single biggest threat to the beluga as it would block a key feeding area, not to mention the noise from pile driving and the risk of spills from the bridge," said Brendan Cummings of the Center for Biological Diversity. His group initially petitioned for federal protections, which require that bridge builders consult with the National Marine Fisheries Service and show how the construction will not harm the remnant population of about 350 belugas in the Inlet surrounded by urbanized areas.

Healthier U.S. populations of belugas are located in Alaska's Bristol Bay, the eastern Bering Sea, the Chukchi Sea and the Beaufort Sea. Canada also has various populations of belugas, some of them healthy and some under stress from urbanization on the St. Lawrence River.

-- Kenneth R. Weiss

Photo: Beluga whale at the Vancouver Aquarium  Credit: Kenneth R. Weiss/Los Angeles Times


Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments

The Polar bears eat the Beluga whales in the cook inlet, so you are never going to have a stable population of Beluga whales there as long as the Polar bears are allowed to feed on them. When the population gets down low on the whales, Tthen the bears will die off. The whales will then increase and when there is a surplus of them the bears will start having more offsrping and start to increase again. That's the way it works. We don't need to show nature how to handle the population of Bears and Whales.

That's the famous bridge to nowhere Palin stopped. Maybe she stopped it for the Whales.



Advertisement


Recent Posts
Obama going to Copenhagen |  November 25, 2009, 6:43 am »
California pushes cap-and-trade plan |  November 24, 2009, 1:58 pm »
Green jobs: women and minorities left out? |  November 19, 2009, 2:56 pm »
California regulators outlaw power-hungry TVs |  November 18, 2009, 1:34 pm »



Archives