News & Blogs Award Shows Facts & Dates Galleries Forums    
SEARCH:
Search Entire Site Search Awards Database

Prince vs. Radiohead: Whose 'Creep' is it?

Prince_coachella

No surprises here, but Prince has again taken his anti-fun copyright claims a bit too far.

The Associated Press reported today that the artist's label, NPG Records, has requested that all versions of his Radiohead cover of "Creep" be removed from YouTube. The artist sang the song at the Coachella Valley Music & Arts Festival.

For those who have forgotten, Prince had earlier stopped a video of a baby dancing to his "Let's Go Crazy," which was barely audible in the background of the clip. One of the ironies in that case, and likely here as well, is that Prince has only served to make more people aware of the video and will once again send music fans on a scavenger hunt to find it.

But at least "Let's Go Crazy" was Prince's song. The AP story quotes Radiohead's Thom Yorke as saying that he wants Prince to unblock the tune:

"Really? He's blocked it?" asked Yorke, who figured it was their song to block or not. "Surely, we should block it. Hang on a moment."

Yorke added: "Well, tell him to unblock it. It's our ... song."

YouTube apparently declined to comment to the AP. But for now, you can click this link and find it on YouTube. It's a muffled, poorly shot, 1 minute and 14 second clip, and it will surely destroy Prince's career if it's allowed to stay online.

The Times' Ann Powers reviewed Prince's performance and noted of his version of "Creep" that he "changed it from a dissection of self-loathing to an admonition to feel uplifted." But was the re-interpretation enough for Prince to claim ownership of the tune?

Photo courtesy Spencer Weiner/Los Angeles Times

California gets another fest -- this one with Radiohead

Radiohead200 If the summer festival market continues to grow at this rate, in 2009 there will be no tours, only three-day fests that cost $150 or so. The latest: The Outside Lands Music & Arts Festival in San Francisco Aug. 22-24.

The lineup: Only the three headliners have been officially announced thus far: Radiohead, Jack Johnson and Tom Petty. The official announcement is a bit disappointing, as the SF Weekly already broke the news of the headliners.

But five stages are planned, so expect a fest on the scale of Coachella Valley Music & Arts Festival in Southern California, and expect plenty of overlap. Johnson, in fact, is essentially playing the festival circuit this summer, and just a few weeks prior to Outside Lands, on Aug. 8-10, Johnson and Radiohead will lead New Jersey's All Points West Festival in Liberty State Park in New Jersey.

Quick take: The influx of summer fests is turning destination events into local events, and quickly bringing the market to a saturation point. One start-up, the VIneland Festival from Lollapalooza promoters C3, has already been postponed, as its weekend conflicted with All Points West. Additionally, lineups are rife with overlap, making it more difficult for fans to see summer tours outside of a festival setting.

Outside Lands jumps into what was already a crowded market in 2007, as Coachella and Vegoose (Las Vegas) were marketed to California residents. But Vegoose is also promoted by Superfly, which is hosting Outside Lands with local promoters Another Planet Entertainment, and information on a 2008 edition has not been announced. If all three are to coexist, all three will need to develop their own identities in terms of artist bookings, and minimize artist overlap, as the fests will need to attract fans outside of their immediate market in order to survive.

Outside Lands, in fact, may bring a sudden, if momentary, halt to Coachella ticket sales, as fans will probably only be picking one summer fest. Additionally, Coachella lacks Radiohead and until the band announces its Los Angeles date, a portion of the band's fans may wait to see the full Outside Lands lineup.

As for Radiohead's Los Angeles show, it's widely expected the band will be playing the Hollywood Bowl since it has played the venue before. The Bowl has a pair of dates open a few days before the band is scheduled to be in San Francisco, but a spokesperson for the Bowl declined to comment. 

Photo: Los Angeles Times

Following Radiohead's 'In Rainbows'

Radioheadep_500

Radiohead's pay-what-you-want model turned traditional this week, and it appears the British band's latest album, "In Rainbows," could be headed to the top of the sales chart next week.

The album, which has been available for downloading from the band's website since Oct. 10, was released on CD Tuesday to conventional retailers. The list price is now a less-flexible $13.98, although it could be found selling for as little as $7.99 at major outlets such as Best Buy and Amazon.com.

Early  reports suggest that "In Rainbows"  is on target to sell about 100,000 copies. Its biggest competitor is likely to be Mary J. Blige's "Growing Pains," which took over the No. 1 slot this week with sales of 204,000 copies in its second week in stores.

Despite "In Rainbows" being available for free for three months, this week's CD release got a heavy marketing blitz, including a New Year's Eve webcast on Current TV.

"We didn't want to go out and jam it down people's throats," said Phil Costello, who runs his own label, TBD, through ATO Records, which has released the "In Rainbows" CD, and was a vice president at Radiohead's former label, Capitol. "I think we did a good job of exposing the fact that we were physically putting an album and CD in the marketplace that was reflective of what people were able to download since Oct. 10. The real question is: Who is going to show up and when, and how interested are they in the fact of physical purchase? That's the million-dollar question."

In_rainbows_275Moving units

At Amoeba Records in Hollywood, general manager Karen Pearson said the store has sold more than 400 "In Rainbows" CDs in its first two days, and more than 100 copies of the vinyl edition. "Radiohead is, of course, a band with a solid base," Pearson said. "The LP is selling actually better than anticipated."

With overall album sales down around 15% in 2007 compared to 2006, according to Nielsen SoundScan, artists and labels are eager to experiment with new models, and the "In Rainbows" trial is now officially in Phase 2.

Radiohead gave just 10 days' advance notice before the Web release of "In Rainbows," the big news being that fans would determine how much they would pay, or whether to pay at all. "Really -- it's up to you," fans downloading the album at www.radiohead.com were advised. The band and its management have remained tight-lipped on exactly how many downloaded the album. One website that surveyed Radiohead fans said that about 60% reported paying nothing.

The big experiment

In a year that saw Prince distributing an album free with a U.K. newspaper, Paul McCartney aligning with Starbucks, and Madonna signing with a concert promoter over a record label, Radiohead's decision to make its latest album available for free was one of 2007's hottest pop-music topics.

But Radiohead and its camp were quick to point out the release wasn't an act of altruism. While the media greeted the move as a death knell for the major labels, Radiohead was busy negotiating with them, and ultimately paired with independent ATO, which is overseen by former Columbia Records group chairman Will Botwin.

So back to the question: If a band gives away a new album for free, will fans purchase an actual CD, one whose bonus content consists of little more than "some cool stickers," according to an e-mail blast from Borders?

"If we would have put three more songs on it, then clearly your first, second and third week sales would be much bigger," Costello said. "There's not a question in my mind about that. But is that the right approach to the core fan base? I don't think so. And I don't think it's the right play for even the secondary people you'd pull in. I wouldn't feel good about that move."

A retail executive with access to first-day sales figures for "In Rainbows" says the album sold 40,000 copies New Year's Day. If it indeed goes on to sell 100,000 copies, that's a significant drop from the band's last album, 2003's "Hail to the Thief," which moved 300,000 copies in its first week. But few of the biggest-selling acts of 2007 have been able to match their peak sales of previous years.

Costello calls "In Rainbows" one of the "warmest" and "broadest-appeal records" Radiohead has made, and expects its to be a consistent seller throughout the year. The album will become available at Starbucks locations beginning Jan. 8, and the band will be touring in 2008. No U.S. dates have been announced, but the band has lined up summer dates in Europe.

Proven longevity

Radiohead traditionally has played for the long haul.

"Hail to the Thief," for instance, has sold about 1 million copies since its release. Another Radiohead spokesperson emphasizes that looking at the first week tallies for "In Rainbows" and "Hail to the Thief" is "comparing apples to oranges," stressing other factors beyond the Web availability, such as the year-to-year decline in CD sales since 2003 and the slow January market.

Last January, for instance,  the "Dreamgirls" soundtrack reached No. 1 with sales of just 66,000 copies, the lowest figure for a No. 1 album since SoundScan started tracking retail sales in 1991.

Yet Billboard Magazine's director of charts, Geoff Mayfield, said there probably is only one reason to explain a large drop in Radiohead's first-week sales compared to that of "Hail to the Thief."

"It's true you don't have the sales volume in January that you have in December," he said. "That's obvious, but if you have a key release, the numbers will happen.

"It will be a decent number, and it's an interesting number," he continued. "But you can't argue either a down market or a soft month to explain why the number is smaller than the last album. The elephant in the room is that you already made the album widely available months before it hit stores."

(Photo courtesy Los Angeles Times)

Local Ads
Advertisement

Gold Derby
The Dish Rag
Pop & Hiss
Notes on a Season
The Feinberg Files
Advertisement

Advertisement