Entertainment Industry

« Previous | Company Town Home | Next »

Box office: 'Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps' trumps weak 'Legend of the Guardians' and 'You Again' [Updated]

Two decades out of the spotlight haven't hurt Gordon Gekko much.

"Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps," the contemporary follow-up to the 1987 zeitgeist classic, was master of the box-office universe this weekend, grossing a solid $19 million, according to Fox estimates. The movie beat 3-D animated film "Legend of the Guardians: The Owls of Ga'Hoole" and "You Again," the weekend's other wide openers. Those two movies grossed $16.3 million and $8.3 million, respectively, according to studio estimates.

Showing surprising strength was Ben Affleck's Boston crime drama "The Town," which dropped just 33% from its opening weekend to gross $16 million, finishing just a hair behind its Warner Bros. stablemate "Guardians" in third place, the studio said.

Disney's inter-generational hugs and slapstick of "You Again" could muster only a spot in fifth place, leapfrogged by the better-received "Easy A." The Emma Stone high-school dramedy grossed $10.7 million, falling just 40% percent in its second weekend, according to studio Screen Gems.

While some industry observers had been expecting an opening upward of $20 million for "Wall Street," the $19-million figure was still relatively strong, putting the drama on course to recoup on domestic receipts alone its post-credit outlay of $50 million. It's also the best opener for director Oliver Stone, edging out his $18.7 million for "World Trade Center" in 2006.

"Wall Street" was strongest among older audiences, with moviegoers over the age of 30 comprising two-thirds of ticket-holders. On the whole, the movie was adequately received by filmgoers, who gave the multilayered story a CinemaScore of B-.

The Stone-directed sequel brings back disgraced kingpin Gekko (Michael Douglas), newly sprung from prison, and introduces a host of new characters (played by the likes of Josh Brolin, Shia LaBeouf and Carey Mulligan), all of whom suffer and scheme against the backdrop of the 2008 financial crisis. Stone, producer Edward Pressman and others had resisted the temptation for a "Wall Street" sequel for years. But the credit crunch two years ago convinced them and screenwriters Stephen Schiff and Allan Loeb to contemporize and continue the storyline.

The movie's prospects looked dim after it was pushed back five months from its initial release date of April 23. But Fox gambled that a delay was worth a release in an autumnal season more hospitable to adult fare and set into motion a slow rollout that began at the Cannes Film Festival in May.

The weekend clearly spelled disappointment for the pricier "Guardians." Warner Bros. had hoped that its first animated film since 2006's smash "Happy Feet" would yield some of the same mojo as that movie, with "300" director Zack Snyder bringing his trademark flash to the children's tale of a battle between good and evil in the owl world. But despite the advantage of higher 3-D ticket prices, the movie managed a number that was below the $20 million that some observers had predicted. The $16.3 million foretells a cumulative figure that is not close to the roughly $80 million the film is estimated to have cost after tax credits.

Legend The weekend figures also raise questions about the studio's wherewithal in releasing upcoming live action-animated hybrid "Yogi Bear," though that film is perceived as more conducive to a broad family audience than "Guardians."

"You Again," meanwhile, proved that the romantic and comedic hi-jinks at a family reunion -- a formula that served Disney well with 2009 breakout "The Proposal -- was not a magic bullet for the studio this time around. Although the movie cost only about $20 million to make, the hope that a bevy of multigenerational stars -- including an appearance from a resurgent Betty White -- would turn it into a crossover hit proved empty. Critics did not care for "You Again" -- it garnered a 13% on Rotten Tomatoes -- and the movie scrounged up a per-screen average of just $3,260 in its first weekend of release. 

Disney will cross its fingers that the picture, which earned a respectable B+ CinemaScore, will have some legs.

Even more disappointing was Sony's unconventional rollout for the youth-skewing comedy "The Virginity Hit." The gambit of taking the movie to college campuses and other youth-heavy venues did not bear fruit. According to Sony, the low-budget film, which follows a group of teenagers as they attempt to lose their virginity, grossed a dismal $300,000 on its 700 screens for a scant average of barely more than $400 on each screen.

Easily the most upbeat story of the weekend concerned Affleck's "The Town." Even a big drop would have kept Warner Bros. well in the black. As it is, the film's 10-day total of $49.1 million far surpasses expectations for a movie that cost the studio and partner Legendary Pictures $37 million to produce.

In limited release, Lionsgate opened claustrophobic thriller "Buried" to $105,000 and a decent per-screen average of $9,500. Woody Allen's 41st feature, "You Will Meet a Tall Dark Stranger," grossed $163,500 this weekend for a five-day total of $214,800; the movie averaged an impressive $27,300 on each of its six screens. David Guggenheim's documentary "Waiting for Superman" performed equally well in its limited release. The education-policy cri de coeur averaged $35,000 on each of its four screens for a three-day total of $141,000.

[Updated at 10:43 a.m.: Here are the top 10 movies at the domestic box office according to studio estimates and Hollywood.com, along with international ticket sales when available.]

1. "Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps" (20th Century Fox): Opened to $19 million domestically.  Opened in a smattering of foreign markets, including Australia, Sweden and Brazil, for a solid total of $9.1 million.

2. Legend of the Guardians: The Owls of Ga'Hoole" (Warner Bros./Village Roadshow): Opened to $16.3 million.

3. "The Town" (Warner Bros./Legendary): $16 million on its second weekend, down 33%. Grossed $4.5 million in six international markets. Domestic total: $49.1 million. International total: $7.2 million.

4. "Easy A" (Sony Screen Gems): $10.7 million on its second weekend, down 40%. Domestic total: $32.8 million.

5. "You Again" (Disney): Opened to $8.3 million domestically. Also opened in one foreign market (Russia) to $1.3 million.

6. "Devil" (Universal):$6.5 million on its second weekend, down 47%. Grossed $2.8 million in 12 foreign markets. Domestical total: $21.7 million. International total: $6.5 million

7. "Resident Evil: Afterlife (Sony Screen Gems/Constantin): $4.9 million on its third weekend, down 51%. Took in another $24 million overseas. Domestic total: $52 million. International total: $151 million.

8. "Alpha and Omega" (Lionsgate/Crest): $4.7 million on its second weekend, down 48%. Domestic total: $15.1 million.

9. "Takers" (Sony Screen Gems): $1.7 million on its fifth weekend, down 45%. Domestic total: $55 million.

10. "Inception" (Warner Bros./Legendary): $1.3 million on its eleventh weekend, down 37%.Took in $10.6 million overseas in 60 markets. Domestic total: $287 million. International total: $483 million.

-- Steven Zeitchik


Top photo: Michael Douglas and Shia LaBeouf in "Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps." Credit: 20th Century Fox. Bottom photo: "Legend of the Guardians." Credit: Warner Bros.

Comments () | Archives (9)

The totals for numbers 2 and 3 are not the same in the narrative $16.3 and 16 mil)and the list ($18.3 and 18 mil).

I don't understand what's gone wrong with Ken Turan and his bizarre reviews of late. Is he seriously ill? He was clueless, completely lost, regarding the new Wall Street. When it ended, i gave it 8 stars. Turan said the film didn't know what it wanted to be. I saw a very well done film that knew exactly where it was going every plot thread of the way, with beautiful cinematography, excellent performances, fantastic direction and an excellent use of film editing, which like Scorsese's is one of Stone's trademark assets. The board room scenes wherein the plan develops to get the government to bail them out, the references to "the president" who's on their side, could apply to either the last and the incumbent [a pox on both]. The end has been criticized, but even superrich pigs love family.

I expect close to 10 Oscar nominations for it, including SEVERAL in the acting category: Douglas and, in supporting roles, Carey McWilliams, Josh Brolin, perhaps Susan Sarandon, maybe Eli Wallach, and if they don't forget how good he was, how he carried the film in the first half hour, Frank Langella. All outstanding, even Shia le Boeuf. It was wonderful to see Charlie Sheen return from the original 23 years ago in an uncredited cameo uttering several telling lines. And no Darryl Hannah! Oliver Stone knows how to use long close-ups on his actors, to let them work out their characters on their faces. Rivetting emotion. What a cast, and easily worthy of a Best Picture. *********

Oh, come on -- "Wall Street" was "solid" at $19 million, which is LESS than "Takers" or "The Last Exorcism" a few weeks ago, films without massive, overpaid stars (or star directors) and produced at FAR lower budgets.

This is pure PR puffery. The MUCH more accurate lede would have been:

Long-delayed "Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps" and the pricey animated "Legends of the Guardians" were box-office disappointments, with the sequel to 1987's "Wall Street" collecting less than $20 million, and the 3-D surcharge failing to do much for the family oriented owl adventure.

The autumn doldrums were evident, as Disney/Touchstone's "You Again" failed to crack the $10 million mark, though the mild decline of Ben Affleck's "The Town" was a bit of a bright spot. The lauded crime drama fell less than 35% from last weekend's opening.

Why sugar-coat things?! "Wall Street" was a huge disappointment, and certainly indicates that moviegoers aren't exactly enamored of Shia LaBeouf!

Just saw Wall Street - Money Never Sleeps, but the Audience Does. My wife and I both had to keep from dozing, expecting SOMETHING would happen. This was about 1% as interesting as the first one. Oliver Stone owes everyone, especially those who really liked the first one, a much better movie. This one was a soap opera - except more boring - but it didn't have to be, as all the elements were in place. This movie is not even a good rental.

awesome movie!!!!!

I also agree that evaluating success can be odd. Clooney's film brings in less that $15 mil over four days and it is proof of his "star power", yet the cartoon's total is disappointing. Julia Roberts film made more than $23 million in three days and it is proclaimed a disappointment as well. And now Wall Street is "solid" at $19 mil and a "hit" for Douglas. Why do two men have "hits" with less in receipts than the woman who is proclaimed a flop (P.S--I don't even like Julia Roberts)? And her film is still chugging along, not a record breaker, but will make more than the Clooney movie.

Budget should also not be an issue as when people go to movies, they don't know what it cost to make the film, they go because they think it will be enjoyable. Shouldn't success be evaluated using the same criteria.

This was a wonderful movie although there was a few times where it just dragged on. I guess however to a lot economics isn't just very exciting.

The rub with the new Gordon Gekko opus is that the kid he is mentoring (Shia LaBeouf) is a shrimp who can't be a Wall Street He-Man. Hollywood hires Sleepy LaBeouf because he is temporarily cheap to employ, same with the nobody child woman they hired to play Gekko's daughter. The Studios want $100 million domestic out of this film because it won't do that well overseas. So they tried to marry two audiences, the 77 million strong Boomers and some of the 18-34 male crowd LaBoeuf represents. There's a veiled story of the Lehman Brothers failure two years ago, that tells very poorly and doesn't really seem to have much to do with the fortunes of Gordon Gekko, his daughter or prospective son-in-law (La Boeuf). When Charlie Sheen shows up for a cameo near the film's end, canny folks in the audience realize Charlie is only 20 years younger than Gekko, but LaBeouf is a Hollywood Casting Bridge Too Far, 40 years younger than Gekko. This pair can't really relate, La Beouf makes no sense on Wall Street, and no character, not even designated villian Josh Brolin, or HIS resurrected mentor at the end, Eli Wallach, can sell this dumb story. At first I blamed the casting of the two young leads, but eventually I see that the ephemeral financial story has no real connection to Gekko or the kids. Gekko needed to mentor Josh Brolin, but that wouldn't have had the reach into the Y Generation that the Suits in the Fox Tower want. Oliver Stone had a cameo too as an investor. He should have gotten himself a real story. With Brolin as the mentored 'young man' he'd have had a hit to match last week's very good the Town, a film that came close to topping the charts in Company Town.

native angeleno, interesting how different people can perceive something completely different. i thought some of the camera shots were a little bit sloppy, unintentionally, and there were some shots of the new york skyline that had the potential to be fantastic, but were ruined by the way the camera was handled. i also thought maybe it tied the story a little too much to the 2008 implosion/bailout. despite my criticisms i still thought it was a decent sequel and worth the time and money to see it in the theater.

you again, i actually really enjoyed that film, despite the fact it was destroyed by the critics


Recommended on Facebook

In Case You Missed It...

Photos: L.A.’s busiest filming sites