Entertainment Industry

« Previous | Company Town Home | Next »

Hollywood looks to preserve its natural back lot: California state parks

Stateparks Along with the sunny weather and world-class crews, California offers something else that is sought by filmmakers: an abundance of state parks with diverse landscapes, from the redwood forests in Northern California to the desert of Anza-Borrego and the vast beaches and rocky coves of Point Dume.
 
Not surprisingly, the beauty and variety of the state’s 278 parks have provided countless backdrops for movies, TV shows and commercials for a century. In 2009 alone, nearly 500 permits were issued for nearly 1,000 days of filming in state parks for various productions, including "Iron Man 2" (Point Dume State Beach) and the romantic comedy "I Love You, Man" (Leo Carrillo State Park).

Symphoria There’s even an annual film series, hosted next month by the California State Parks Foundation, that highlights how Hollywood has relied on state parks as settings for such shows as the long-running TV series "MASH" and films such as the 1968 classic "Planet of the Apes."

But there’s growing concern in the film community that state parks, which are severely underfunded and at risk of closing or falling into disrepair due to the state’s budget crisis, could get written out of the filmmaking script.

On Nov. 2, state residents will be voting on a ballot initiative, called Proposition 21, that would require Californians to pay an extra $18 as part of their annual vehicle registration fee in exchange for eliminating day-pass fees at state parks. That may be a tough sell in the current economic climate, but  proponents say California’s state parks need a reliable revenue stream to keep them open to the public and for commercial use.

Some of the biggest supporters of the initiative aren’t just conservation groups -- film commissions as well as location managers view the parks as an essential asset for filmmakers.

"The parks are beautiful, huge and diverse back lots for us," said Veronique Vowell, chairman of the government affairs committee for the Location Managers Guild of America, which has endorsed the ballot initiative. "My concern is that if some of the parks were to close, it would be a disincentive to keep filming in California."

In the last decade, production has been steadily leaving the state, thanks to the proliferation of tax credits and rebates offered elsewhere, although the migration slowed after California adopted its own film tax-credit program last year.

Vowell and other location managers see the parks as another selling point that helps keep jobs -– and tax revenues -- in the state.

There is evidence to back up the claim. State parks accounted for 62% of all film production permitted by the California Film Commission last year. “State parks have been an incredible source of locations over the years,’’ said Amy Lemisch, director of the California Film Commission.

Parks officials are certainly happy for the exposure. "It offers us a tremendous opportunity for us to promote our parks," said Kris Lannin, who handles film issues on behalf of the California Department of  Parks and Recreation.

Beyond diverse locations, parks are appealing because they provide inexpensive locations, Lemisch said. "If you were going to rent a private beach, I don't know what it would cost."

Parks don’t charge a permit fee, and filmmakers are only required to pay the salary of a park ranger, who serves as a monitor, and for any costs the parks incur during filming.

That’s a bargain, especially for producers of ultra-low- budget movies, such as Nancy Isaak, who recently filmed virtually all of her movie, a romantic thriller called “Symphoria,” at Malibu Creek State Park, one of the parks most frequently used for filming.

"Shooting inside a state park is just ideal for us because it fits our budget but gives us a million-dollar look," said Isaak, who had a small part in the film. She was standing under a canopy with her small crew as they were recently filming a scene on a hilltop overlooking a pine forest that was chosen for the image it evoked of a Chinese landscape. In the film, the park is a favorite gathering place for a Chinese American family.

They had also shot scenes at the park’s Century Lake and in front of giant fallen oak tree near a ravine that served as a famous backdrop for the brutal human roundup depicted in "Planet of the Apes."  They even used a parking lot at the entrance to film a college campus scene.

"You get vistas that you can substitute for almost anything," Isaak said.

-- Richard Verrier

Photo: Actress and producer Nancy Isaak has makeup applied by Beatrice Najera as an independent film crew shoots a romantic thriller called "Symphoria" in Malibu Creek State Park last week. Credit: Anne Cusack /Los Angeles Times 

READ MORE "ON LOCATION" COVERAGE:

Film tax credits run dry in California

LL Cool J in action at La Brea Tar Pits

L.A. takes a bite out of Big Apple

All Trains Lead to Fillmore

On-location filming rebounds in L.A. 

"Happy Cow"bill aims to keep commercials in state

Griffith Park: location managers' paradise

Hollywood has Georgia on its mind

Independent filmmakers opens a window on filmmaking process

"Transformers" takes over L.A.'s streets



 
Comments () | Archives (16)

Regardless of the motive, we all benefit.

Beyond a flat fee, why not have the state parks systems sign on for a percentage of the gross box office take for movies and for a piece of commercial buys for television shows? Fair's fair!

Prop 21 is a great deal for all Californians IF our representatives in Sacramento can keep their sticky mitts off of the park funds. I'm enthusiastically supporting it. Imagine being able to enter any state park without paying an entrance fee! Yipee!

Yeah, do we really need the film industry to promote the natural wonders of our state. If so we are done, check please!. What would jesus say, mother!

$18 per year for state park day use fee? That's a steal! An annual pass costs $125... I'm all for it!

Sorry. If they have enough in the budget for a shoot,they can afford the permits. This fee is all wrong.


Are you kidding? Presently DMV fees keep
the roads in shape right? We voted up two
props REQUIRING our legislators to apply
fuel tax towards roads right? We voted for the Lottery to better our schools remember? Wake up people! The money all goes into the general fund and then....POOF...it's gone. Like a Paul Angel magic act. Vote no on everything. It's the only way because they're like drug addicts

How about letting the film industry foot the bill for the parks?

Every production that leaves California is a job for an electrician, a caterer or a driver...CA state parks are clearly an incentive to keeping those jobs, jobs that we desperately need, in California. It's not only the benefits for entertainment, but our broader economy, our schools and our health. If you haven't yet, check out http://www.YesForStateParks.com

Does it really matter what we vote for? California still has no budget, our state government is paralyzed, and no one in authority has any true power. State parks are the least of our problems. California needs to convene a state constitutional assembly to give real authority to elected leaders, so someone can be accountable. Other wise we will resemble the city of Bell, rotten to the core, with an apathetic citizenry who no longer cares.

Film production companies will pay $2,000-$5,000 a day to shoot in privately owned ranches. Why do they expect the state owned parks to be free?

One shoot day will cost the production company over 100K in wages and equipment. The background, the location, will take most of the screen. Shouldn't its value be more than zero?

Let folks who use and love the parks so much pay higher use fees. Why should I subsidize someone else vacation or film shoot?

It's a Pretty Sad World, to have to ask for Payment, to Viset, or even Make a Movie. But, I believe there is need for Bucks. (Both Types) I know I might only Viset 1/2 Dozen times in my Life. Many Viset more regularily. They need to Pay more at the Enterance. The Movie Folks need to Pay More. EVERYBODY should be charged, for Littering, and Vehicles should be somewhat restricted. Or pay an added amount. Take Away our Parks? And Draw Blood. BIG TIME!

Someone who creates budgets for film and TV, please, help explain something here. A-List movie stars make $15+ million per motion picture, the Hollywood Hills & Pacific Palisades are populated by film producers and television executives in multi-million dollar homes. And now you want to require all Californians, regardless if they use State Parks or not, to subsidize production here in the state with a mandatory fee - what am I missing?

The amount of money State Parks would need to keep it beautiful would be a pittance to the coffers of the film industry. I would love to see them honor and take care of that beautiful land that has served them so perfectly. Now there’s a love story.

Garbologist and Hole in the ground makers want to preserve the natural scenery and English language in Los Angeles County!


Advertisement
Connect

Recommended on Facebook


In Case You Missed It...


Photos: L.A.’s busiest filming sites

Video





Categories

Companies


Archives