Entertainment Industry

« Previous | Company Town Home | Next »

First Look: 'Shrek' falls short on fourth go-round while 'MacGruber' bombs

ShrekForever "Shrek" may have overstayed his welcome on the big screen.

"Shrek Forever After," the fourth and final installment in the most successful animated series of all time, sold $71.3 million worth of tickets in the U.S. and Canada this weekend, according to an estimate from distributor Paramount Pictures.

That's a 41% drop from the $121.6-million debut of "Shrek the Third" on the same weekend in 2007 and significantly below even the most conservative pre-release estimates for the new film's opening weekend.

The decline in revenue significantly understates the drop in attendance, however, as "Forever After" is the first "Shrek" movie to play in digital 3-D, which means the majority of tickets carried a surcharge of about $3 on top of normal price inflation over the last three years.

Still, "Shrek Forever After," which cost DreamWorks Animation about $165 million to produce, will probably hold on well in the coming weeks and have a relatively strong performance over the Memorial Day holiday weekend, as it will be the only family film and only 3-D film in theaters. Moviegoers who saw the new "Shrek" movie gave it an average grade of A, according to market research firm CinemaScore, up from a B+ for the third installment, which means word-of-mouth should be very healthy.

But it's unlikely to end up a blockbuster on the same scale as "Shrek the Third," which had a final domestic gross of $323 million, or 2004's "Shrek 2," which finished its run with $422 million.

Overseas could be a different story. Though "Shrek Forever After" won't open in most major foreign countries until after the World Cup, the film debuted in Russia this weekend to a huge $20 million. That's the most successful opening ever in the country, slightly ahead of last year's "Avatar." If "Shrek Forever After" ends up anywhere close to the nearly $500 million that its two predecessors grossed overseas, it will still be very profitable for DreamWorks.

MacGruber "MacGruber," a parody of the 1980s series "MacGyver," set a new low in the undistinguished commercial history of movies based on "Saturday Night Live" skits. The inexpensive Rogue Pictures film, which was distributed by Universal Pictures, opened to a dismal $4.1 million.

That's the smallest opening ever for an "SNL" movie in wide release, below even the opening of "The Blues Brothers" in 1980 when ticket prices were a fraction of what they are today. It's also the worst debut for any movie in wide release so far in 2010.

Ticket sales for "Robin Hood" dropped a so-so 48% after the soft start for the big-budget adventure starring Russell Crowe, putting it at $18.7 million. The romantic "Letters to Juliet" starring Amanda Seyfried held on well, however, falling only 33% to $9.1 million.

Both movies came in behind "Iron Man 2," which saw ticket sales fall 49% on its third weekend to $26.6 million, bringing its total domestic gross so far to a very strong $251.3 million.

-- Ben Fritz


"Movie Projector" for "Shrek Forever After"

Times' box office coverage

Times' review of "Shrek Forever After"

Times' review of "MacGruber"

Top photo: A scene from "Shrek Forever After." Credit: DreamWorks Animation. Bottom photo, from left: Ryan Phillippe, Will Forte and Kristen Wiig in "MacGruber." Credit: Greg Peters / Rogue Pictures

Comments () | Archives (3)

MacGruber is a rip of MacGyver... it was huge in the eighties where the young teen to twenties market loved it. Thing is, that market is all grown up now, tastes have changed, and sending up things like this really don't work. Even SNL has kind of had its day.

The market may have grown up, but I suspect that execs behind this glut of re-makes and "homages" basically haven't.

I have boxsets of MacGuyver, I used to love it, but I've realised that going back has not been a particularly good journey, like the early Dr Who, it's just a little bit too creaky.

You obviously didn't see the film. It wasn't as much about the throwback as it was about the hilarious total incompetence and absurdity of the character- which Will Forte played really well. Everyone left the theatre pleased, impressed with the film (likely because they didn't know what to expect).

There are things working against the film- one is the R rating and the other is the slew of lame SNL movies that has soured moviegoers on the concept. This movie is different. In the other films, the story is one, long, lame underdeveloped joke. This film goes to comic extremes that they could never air on television, making it a very different offering.

I liked the film and I would recommend it.

I always wonder who are the fools who actually greenlight such projects as "MacGruber", which is such an obviously lame and DOA prospect. I really think there must be some money moving under the table over there in Hollywood to get these idiot movies made and built up in the "hype machine" as if they are really going to DO something in the box office. I mean, *really*. Did they really have to make and release the film to realize how much it was going to bomb?


Recommended on Facebook

In Case You Missed It...

Photos: L.A.’s busiest filming sites