'District 9' lays down the law to men while 'Time Traveler's Wife' locks in women
Sony Pictures' "District 9," a relatively low-budget sci-fi take on apartheid, imprisoned moviegoers over the weekend, steamrolling past the competition on the way to a $36.9 million debut, much better than the initial tracking that had it opening in the mid-$20 million range in the U.S.
The independently financed "District 9," which had a budget of $30 million, was produced by Peter Jackson and directed by Neill Blomkamp. The quirky viral marketing campaign, which included posters for the movie all around major cities warning of alien activity, created a hype and mystery around "District 9" far in advance of its opening. The Saturday box office for "District 9" dropped only 10%, a sign that this one might have a reach beyond the so-called fanboy audience although for now that is who is primarily driving ticket sales. Sony said 64% of the audience for the R-rated "District 9" was male and 57% were over the age of 25.
"You could feel the ground moving," said Rory Bruer, president of worldwide distribution for Sony Pictures about the buzz for "District 9." Bruer expects "District 9" to expand beyond its male base in the days ahead.
"It absolutely will," Bruer predicted. "There is a tremendous amount of emotion in this film that women will embrace."
The other major opening this weekend, Warner Bros.' "The Time Traveler's Wife" came in third place behind "District 9" and a fading "G.I. Joe" to take in $19.2 million, with an audience that was more than 70% women. Based on the bestselling book, the studio said it was very pleased with the performance of the Rachel McAdams-Eric Bana film, despite industry tracking earlier last week that had it performing in the mid-$20 million range.
"There is no reason to assume those numbers were realistic," said Dan Fellman, president of theatrical distribution for Warner Bros. "This is way above our expectations." He noted that the movie did better than other recent female-driven films including this summer's "My Sister's Keeper." Though "The Proposal" had a much stronger opening, Fellman countered that that was a more broad-based movie and not an accurate comparison. "We never had that in our sights," he said.
Paramount's "G.I. Joe" continued its slide after a strong opening. It took in $22.8 million for the weekend, which was good enough for second place but it dropped almost 60% from last weekend. Still, while interest is starting to fade, it will cross the $100 million domestic box office mark early this week.
Sony's "Julie & Julia" took in $12.4 million, off under 40% from its opening weekend, which is a good sign for the cooking comedy. "It's a very solid hold," Bruer said.
Rounding out the top five was Disney's "G-Force," which took in $7 million, a 29% drop from last weekend.
Disney's limited release of "Ponyo," from renowned animator Hayao Miyazaki, took in $3.5 million and the studio says it is on track to surpass the $10 million record that his "Spirited Away" set.
-- Joe Flint
Photos: Top: "District 9." Credit: David Bloomer/Sony Pictures. Bottom: "The Time Traveler's Wife." Credit: Alan Markfield/Associated Press








= = = 1) too much hype; 2) too many pictures out-focus; 3) panning way too fast; 4) too much babbling by the reporter; 5) too much violence. The hype was unjustified.
I am rating this picture âFâ.
Am I the only one to feel this way?
Posted by: hebelman | August 16, 2009 at 01:36 PM
1. No hype but great trailers and marketing 2. The direction and story creativity of this movie is awesome! 3. See #2 4. This movie is pseudo documentary, a screenplay method 5. Hello? It's R rated! Movie was simply AWESOME!! I am rating this movie "A" Never seen a movie like this before. Great creative story and special effects!
Posted by: SciFi Fan | August 17, 2009 at 01:50 AM
District 9 is terrible! Extreme violence every few seconds...lots of exploding people, violence, and ripped off arms...just ridiculous. I give it an F- and wish I could get my money back.
Posted by: Mary | August 17, 2009 at 09:46 AM
District 9 was the brainiest summer action movie I've seen in recent memory. To the naysayers... Would you rather have Transformers or this? I'd take this as my "action fix" 10 out of 10 times over the tripe that usually gets pawned off. Too bad this type of film is the exception and not the rule.
Posted by: Josh Eyre | August 18, 2009 at 07:47 AM
= = = Well. I suppose it is the eyes of the beholder. In any event, THERE IS TOO much violence in this movie. Maybe the plot was awesome but the execution was miserable. Maybe I take a John Wayne movie or a Steven Seagal movie anytime over DISTRICT 9. Compare the photography and plots of the original StarTrek movies to District 9 and you know what I mean! Yes, the Trailers were enticing but the bottom line is that I should be getting my money back. But I do must admit, the hype and advertising is awesome â but the product does not bear this out.
Posted by: hebelman | August 20, 2009 at 10:22 AM
my all time favorite movie! so glad i went to see it
Posted by: gates | September 20, 2009 at 03:28 PM
Hebelman - you are the only one to see the truth. District 9 is a waste of human energy - both for the makers, and the audience. the camera work was shaky, the lighting dark, the uneven sound rankled, the violence was pointless, the story lost it completely. horrible. terrible. awful. wasteful. no redeeming qualities at all. don't waste your time. go outside and celebrate life and avoid this crap.
Posted by: david | February 14, 2010 at 12:56 AM
That man is handsom and that woman is beautiful. Why? Only handsome man can take beautiful woman?
Posted by: Windows 8 Technical Manual | March 17, 2011 at 12:51 AM