Viacom threatens to yank programming off Time Warner Cable systems
"Spongebob Squarepants," "Dora the Explorer" and Jon Stewart soon might be pulled off Time Warner Cable systems in Los Angeles and around the country if the cable operator and Viacom Inc. cannot reach a new contract before midnight tomorrow. The move could knock Viacom's cable channels, which include Nickelodeon, MTV, VH1 and Comedy Central off nearly 2 million households in Los Angeles.
"We've been attempting to negotiate in good faith but they seem to taken it to the brink. Unfortunately, we are now at an impasse," said Philippe Dauman, chief executive of Viacom Inc. "It's unfortunate for all of our viewers should they lose the ability to watch our programming."
Viacom's license agreement with Time Warner Cable, which serves 12.3 million homes in the U.S., is set to expire at midnight Wednesday. If no deal is reached, Time Warner must take the Viacom channels off its cable systems and use alternative programming instead.
"Advertising revenue stinks so they are looking to stick our customers for the difference," said Alex Dudley, Time Warner Cable spokesman. "They are holding our customers hostage for a bunch of networks with sagging ratings and only one or two good channels. We have to hold the line for our customers."
Viacom said that it is asking for an increase of about 25 cents per month for the package of channels, which comes to about $3 a year per customer. Time Warner said that could trigger cable networks to demand higher fees as well, which ultimately could add as much $30 a year to a subscribers' bill.
This wouldn't be the first time that a cable channel has gone dark. It is not unusual for cable networks and cable system operators to pull or block programming during difficult negotiations. In 2004, for example, Viacom's cable channels disappeared from EchoStar's Dish Network for two days while both sides quarelled over the terms of a new contract. Earlier, Time Warner blocked ABC from its cable systems in New York during a breakdown in contract negotiations with parent company Disney involving carriage of its cable networks such as the Disney Channel and Toon Disney.
But the high-stakes dispute could prove to be different this time around because much of Viacom's programming, including Comedy Central's John Stewart and Steven Colbert, is now available free online. Moreover, Viacom no longer owns CBS, so it can't threaten to pull the network off cable systems on the eve of NFL playoffs, as leverage in negotiations. The hard-nosed tactics also come at a time when Viacom's stock is trading at historic lows and the company's controlling shareholder, Sumner Redstone, is facing hard choices in refinacing the debt of his holding company, National Amusements Inc.
-- Meg James
Photos: Left: Philippe Dauman, chief executive, Viacom Inc. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images); Right: Glenn Britt, chief executive, Time Warner Cable (Seth Wenig/AP)
| Bookmark it: |
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c630a53ef0105369df1ab970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Viacom threatens to yank programming off Time Warner Cable systems:

Oh man, this is gonna be interesting. I really don't want to see those channels disappear from my lineup. Maybe if they replaced them with GSN, everyone would be happy. ^_^
Posted by: SpongeFreak52 | December 31, 2008 at 02:09 PM
And good ridance to all those terrible networks. I'm tired of paying for cable content I don't watch. If people want the garbage produced by Viacom (MTV, VH1, BET, Nick etc), they should pay for it separately. Between these trash networks and all the useless sports on TV, I and other like-minded intellectuals are forced to pay much more for cable and satellite service than what we consume. Let's move toward ala carte programming.
Posted by: Roger KC | December 31, 2008 at 02:10 PM
My children, ages four and seven, enjoy watching Noggin and have benefitted a great deal from the material on these programs. They would be devastated if they were no longer able to watch their favorite shows any longer and it would be impossible to explain the reasoning behind this to them. There are so very few quality children's programs and channels where you can find programs that are appropriate for children. Please don't take these channels away from our families that really need them.
Posted by: Julie Hutchins | December 31, 2008 at 02:11 PM
I think Viacam is wrong and time Warner is getting all the bad press. Viacom is spening money on full page ads to get viewers to call Time Warner. Is this how they spend their money? Cable bills are too high as it is. We can live without Viacam channels
Posted by: Kathy | December 31, 2008 at 02:12 PM
Viacom must really think we are idiots. For those not in the know...and I know....they do this every year. Quite soon you will get a notice saying that "due to increasing "this or that"or due to "Viacoms threat to reduce cable channels", Time Warner Cable will be increasing your bill. We have put up the good fight and will be retaining these channels. And OH...we will not listen to you when you tell us what new channels you want! So there...take that!
Posted by: Terry Niles | December 31, 2008 at 02:12 PM
The idiots at Time Warner Cable gave me a number to call to stop the channels from being canned. I called, and the line's always busy. Seems like this problem could be over soon, hopefully since Viacom is going to piss off many cable customers like myself.
Posted by: mah | December 31, 2008 at 02:13 PM
This is ridiculous. TWC has a track record for negotiating fair pricing when the chips are down. This time around, Viacom is swinging for the fences and trying ever trick in the book to pressure the cable operator to cave in to their demands. Front page articles in newpapers and crawls at the bottom of the screen are urging viewers to pressure the operator. This would include TWC, COX, Dish to name a few.
I am a believer in the fair market, but their media assault and their tactics are equal to a rabid dog needing its lease tightened. Cable operators have always been able to negotiate some sort of compromise, however, why is this time different? I see Viacom kicking and screaming like a little girl. I pray none of the cable operators in the industry cave in.
All of the operators need to band together and boycott Viacom altogether. With no subscribers, viacom is nothing and the stock will drop and id pray for bankruptcy. Some like TW could buy them, pennies on the dollar and absorb them into the Time Warner family of products.
You could also boycott them, short the shock and burn then just for trying this. Dont bite the hand that feeds you. This is how I would reply back to Viacom. My daughter loves Noggin but I wont cave in to BS like this. DVD FTW.
Viacom needs to be taught a lesson.
Posted by: unamed | December 31, 2008 at 02:14 PM
I have Time Warner for my cable company, but I also have a 4 year old and 3 year old. The only tv the get to watch is Noggin which is part of Nick and involved in this mess. As a customer I would GLADLY pay 23 cents for these channels. I think it is wrong of Time Warner not to give their customers more than one day's notice about this issue. If they would have done that I would be ringing in the new year with a different television provider instead of a last mintue dash to see what satalite has to offer.=O
Posted by: ShaunnaC | December 31, 2008 at 02:15 PM
Wow, I guess I was naive to think that Fisher Broadcasting and Dish Network's disagreement, and the subsequent lost of KOMO 4 from my lineup was the end of the troubles facing us as consumers. However last night as I read the banner scrolling across the bottom of something I was watching on Spike TV, and a call I made to Dish Network it only confirmed what I feared. Not that I would lose these channels, but rather that the companies out there don't care about the end users anymore. Now I suppose in all fairness, they probably have never cared about the customers that they are supposed to be serving. Oh well, at midnight tonight, if I loser the so called 18 channels from Viacom, Time Warner or whoever owns them, I will be making a call to Dish for a disconnect. They want to play hardball? Bring it bitches. I'll find something else to do. Oh yea I got Netflix streaming through XBOX now!!! It was nice knowing you Dish, and all your providers........NOT!
Posted by: Deric | December 31, 2008 at 02:16 PM
Good riddance to those networks and shows. Who cares? I'd rather lose some bad channels like MTV than end up paying more for cable. The shows on those networks are junk.
Posted by: ELS | December 31, 2008 at 02:17 PM
DON'T GET RID OF THE TV CHANNELS JUST SO YOU CAN SAVE A BUCK, OR IN THIS CASE, ONLY PENNIES A DAY. I MAY NOT KNOW THE TOTAL COST YOU MIGHT "SAVE", BUT I KNOW HOW MUCH I PAY FOR CABLE! THIS WHOLE THING IS TOTALLY RIDICULOUS. YOU HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY TO THE AMERICAN CONSUMERS TO PROVIDE THE CHANNELS WE HAVE BEEN WATCHING FOR YEARS AND SHELLING OUT OUR HARD EARNED MONEY TO HAVE. AS A BIG CORPORATION, YOU HAVE TONS OF SURPLUS CASH. HARD WORKING AMERICANS ARE DOING WITHOUT MORE AND MORE EVERYDAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY. DON'T TAKE THESE CHANNELS AWAY.
Posted by: Tessierni D. | December 31, 2008 at 02:17 PM
On the Viacom channels they're putting out TMC's phone number to call and complain. But, does anybody know the number to Viacom? I'd rather call them and complain.
Posted by: Rick | December 31, 2008 at 02:18 PM
I'll pay the extra 3$ a year......but only if Viacom promises to add 4 more MTVs that have nothing to do with music. Good riddance. Sagging ratings, dropping advo revenue, it is high time the supercorps reap what they sew. Asking for more money while thier top level execs are walking around with 50+ million$ salaries.. http://www.thecorporatecounsel.net/blog/archive/001149.html
Posted by: M Ristow | December 31, 2008 at 02:19 PM
switch to DIRECtv
Posted by: leo | December 31, 2008 at 02:23 PM
If my favorate channels are removed, which ARE on the list....I will stop cable immediately!!
Posted by: Sharon B Tennessee | December 31, 2008 at 02:24 PM
I would be more than happy to lose Viacom's idiotic programming from my Time Warner bill. I am truly paying for something I don't want right now.
I just went through the Viacom's website and realized they produce total garbage. If I have to lose the Neopets Channel, then so be it.
If my bill went down as a result, I'd be thrilled.
Posted by: Big Jim Slade | December 31, 2008 at 02:24 PM
WHY!!!!!!!!!!!!! THESE ARE REALLY GOOD CHANNELS I MUST SWITCH TO NEW CABLE
Posted by: kayla dixon | December 31, 2008 at 02:25 PM
If I lose the Noggin channel I'm dumping TWC, it's phone service and internet and going with satalite, cell phones and DSL. I have a 2 year old and we essentially pay $70 a month for her to watch Noggin.
Posted by: Jasbrit | December 31, 2008 at 02:25 PM
Dora the Explorer might be pulled? Woo hoo1111 Go for it!! That's one of the most annoying cartoons ever!
Posted by: corntrader19 | December 31, 2008 at 02:26 PM
I don't see the issue with the bill going up such a small amount. This is ridiculous and if the channels aren't restored by New Year's I'm canceling our cable. We only got it so we could watch the-n anyway and that channel is off air now. BTW, Thanks Time Warner for not sending us a notice if I hadn't gotten up in the middle of the night out TV would have been burned in due to the fact that the program on the-n froze up as they were turning the station off! GRRRRR! I know that there are plenty of people who agree, raise our bill by a few dollars but don't take away the best channels on air!
Posted by: Monique | December 31, 2008 at 02:27 PM
I don't see the issue with the bill going up such a small amount. This is ridiculous and if the channels aren't restored by New Year's I'm canceling our cable. We only got it so we could watch the-n anyway and that channel is off air now. BTW, Thanks Time Warner for not sending us a notice if I hadn't gotten up in the middle of the night out TV would have been burned in due to the fact that the program on the-n froze up as they were turning the station off! GRRRRR! I know that there are plenty of people who agree, raise our bill by a few dollars but don't take away the best channels on air!
Posted by: Monique | December 31, 2008 at 02:28 PM
Well I have to say that Cable already costs alot... and that extra they want to charge us is just the thing that would cause alot of people to cancel cable or go to a standard which is just local channels.. My self I have lost my job and I already cut my cable down... So we all are hurting... Wouldnt some money be beter than no Money!! And personaly I am starting to get tired of lossing cable channels and still having to pay the same price!!
Posted by: Tammy K. | December 31, 2008 at 02:28 PM
wow...just one more reason to dump time warner cable and dislike viacom.
see you later TWC, you've screwed up for the last time.
Posted by: john sonpull | December 31, 2008 at 02:29 PM
Nice move TWC! You mean you are going to help save the same customers a quarter that you just LAID OUT with $30 more per month in unexplained increased...that were later explained as expired promotional rates no longer being in effect....So, you are going to take Spike TV and the UFC and then you will let them pull Nick off for my kids....THANKS AGAIN TWC!!! EAT THE DAMNED .25 CENTS YOU GREEDY BASTARDS!
Posted by: David Wilson | December 31, 2008 at 02:29 PM
This really disappoints me. Comedy Central, MTV, Nickelodeon, VH1 and many other channels are basically the ONLY reason I have cable. I could easily watch some of the programs on their specific websites (youtube included), but it's nice not to have to stare at a computer screen for more than my work day's hours. I hope this comes to a successful draw so I can go back to enjoying my favorite programs. I already have enough stress in my life, I don't want to be stressing over my tv programs as well...
Posted by: Rose | December 31, 2008 at 02:31 PM
Does anyone know if this will affect Dish customers because i received a message while watching a show on TV Land and I got this message scrolling during the show.
Posted by: Gracia | December 31, 2008 at 02:32 PM
Go ahead, keep pissing off the customer! Don't need the oil, don"t need the loan, don"t need the programming.
Enough is enough.
Posted by: laker | December 31, 2008 at 02:32 PM
Let me get this straight: Viacom wants to stick the customers with the tab of paying more fees so they can see a bigger bottom line. I think the American people have more things to worry about, for instance, getting/keeping jobs, the economic situation in the country and trying to keep our houses. I'm tired of big companies passing the cost on to us; we don't ever see any relief when the factors driving the costs up (remember the fuel surcharge?) are lowered, so if it's only 25 cents, and menial, then Viacom can absorb it and leave my television channels intact. It's bad enough we've bailed out Wall Street, gotten nickle-and-dimed by the airline industry, bailed out the auto industry, and will fund any bailout that may come our way. I don't think we need to take on anymore debt, especially in a time when we can't afford it. Viacom and Time Warner need to come to an agreement, because if I lose channels, but my bill doesn't decrease, I'm jumping ship. I'm tired of funding big companies!
Posted by: Hmmm | December 31, 2008 at 02:33 PM
please don't do this I am one of the time warner customers who watch nickelodeon! This sucks! Please keep nick on! I'm from Queens!
Posted by: Argie | December 31, 2008 at 02:34 PM
i saw the message scroll across comedy central soon after midnight saying to call timewarner and demand action be taken. however, i did not get the number. does anyone have it?
Posted by: Craig | December 31, 2008 at 02:34 PM
A chapter from the Tanous playbook. Who is actually doing the pulling? And who cares?
Paul
Posted by: will.tanous@wmg.com | December 31, 2008 at 02:34 PM
Do these idiots not realize that we are currently in the middle of a recession. People around the country are trying to make the decision between gassing up the car, food on the dinner table, medications or pay the rent.
It's time this madness stopped. It's time that people realized that you have to put in time to earn a "million" dollars. The days of getting rich overnight are coming to an end.
Posted by: Stephen Parkinson | December 31, 2008 at 02:35 PM
The only good channel is Comedy Central that's it, and on top of that everytime I am watching a good show for whatever reason my cable start to act up image freezing etc... only when is big events that millions of ppl watch.
Posted by: Will | December 31, 2008 at 02:36 PM
Time Warner needs to raise their rates thirty dollars to recover a three dollar raise from Viacom? Sure glad I have DreckTV. Much better picture too!
TWC, you suck!
Posted by: Boss Hogg | December 31, 2008 at 02:37 PM
Viacom should pay Time Warner for doing its distribution. Any Channel that sells advertising should not charge a monthly fee. Time Warner is right to balk at paying higher fees.
Posted by: Al | December 31, 2008 at 02:45 PM
Hi -- I'm actually a spokesman for Time Warner Cable. And while we've been negotiating earnestly and fairly from our side to reach an agreement, we haven't made one or agreed to an extension yet.
This is largely because Viacom is asking for price increases that are nearly triple the rate of increase under our current agreement. They're asking our customers to pay millions of dollars more each year for programming that is not only declining in popularity, but increasingly available for free online. These demands would be laughable in a strong economy, and they're absolutely unacceptable in these tight times.
Jeff Simmermon
Director, Digital Communications
Time Warner Cable
Posted by: Jeff Simmermon | December 31, 2008 at 02:46 PM
Who cares, MTV, VH1, are not music channels anymore, they are reality channels and really don't care if they're taken off the air...Good writtens. Time Warner just hiked our prices for programming that use to be FREE... I hope they crush and burn.
Posted by: frank | December 31, 2008 at 02:48 PM
Old Media morons. Just like Les Moonves and everyone else in the old-media world... Constant arguing, can't reach this deal can't reach that deal... Hey guys, have you heard of the internet? All of your "content" is available on it, 24/7/365. Time Warner is also an absolutely horrible cable system (as much as I don't like the corporate devil known as DirecTV, they are leaps and bounds better than Time Warner)...
Posted by: ChrisYo | December 31, 2008 at 02:50 PM
Old Media morons. Just like Les Moonves and everyone else in the old-media world... Constant arguing, can't reach this deal can't reach that deal... Hey guys, have you heard of the internet? All of your "content" is available on it, 24/7/365. Time Warner is also an absolutely horrible cable system (as much as I don't like the corporate devil known as DirecTV, they are leaps and bounds better than Time Warner)...
Posted by: ChrisYo | December 31, 2008 at 02:51 PM
As if Time Warner Cable didn't suck enough.
Posted by: fred | December 31, 2008 at 02:51 PM
IF my family and I lose any channels over this then I will be forced to initiate a petition of people who will be more than happy to switch to Direct TV ! I will post my petetion on line as soon as I lose the first channel. Also, I will encourage as many stock holders to sell as many VIACOM stocks as possible.
Posted by: wayne | December 31, 2008 at 03:15 PM
HEY! My kids love to watch Nickelodeon, and I like to watch Spike. If Viacom is hard up for cash maybe the execs and management should tighten their belts (take a pay cut or auction some of their lavish things) like the little guy has to do whenever the cable networks raise their rates. If MTV gets pulled that's cool. MTV is a bunch of junk anyway; it's not even music television anymore anyway. So go ahead Viacom pull the channels, I will tell everyone I know to stay away from anything related to Viacom. WTF, FTW DVD! :b
Posted by: Allen Russell | December 31, 2008 at 03:36 PM
So who is to blame...viacom or twc?my kids really love nick,but shouldwe be mad at twc or viacom whos the one at fault?
Posted by: eddie | December 31, 2008 at 04:27 PM
The only channels i wish we werent loosing was comedy central or Nick, forget the rest, they suck.
Posted by: maje' | December 31, 2008 at 05:26 PM
Viacom is the one to blame. They have resorted to blackmail and extortion only because they want 3 times more money from Time Warner to cover their failing channels and ratings. Time Warner is trying to protect the customer from extra expense on their bill. If Time Warner gives into Viacom's extortion plan, then the customer will have to pay more. Time Warner is fighting for it's customers.
Posted by: passerby | December 31, 2008 at 05:27 PM
This Really SUCKS I have two boys and my Tv Is always on all the channels that are being taken away :( .If this happens I will Stop my Service for cable and just be keeping my Internet. I am very unhappy:( I know these things Happen ,but man if I would've known about this sooner I would've already dropped my service:(
Posted by: erica raye | December 31, 2008 at 05:27 PM
Time Warner needs to be swallowed up by Comcast anyway :) WE don't have this problem in areas served by Comcast although I do see the message on the channels asking viewers to call TWC and another company. I wonder how many Comcast, Charter, Cox etc. customers are confused by seeing that message on the message on the screen and think THEY will lose tonight?
Posted by: Mr E. Cetlin | December 31, 2008 at 05:28 PM
what the hell.. nick at night !! nooo.. Verizon FIOS here we come
Posted by: Rafa | December 31, 2008 at 06:09 PM
Will my account be credited during the blackout?
Posted by: Brandi | December 31, 2008 at 06:09 PM
I don't think it's fare that viacom will be canceiling our channels I myself dont watch all the channels but I do have children who does watch a lot of the channels, Now if this does take place I should be expecting a decrease in my bill.Right!
Posted by: Angela Witherspoon | December 31, 2008 at 06:09 PM