« Recycle week: holiday cards, reincarnated | Main | Q&A: recycling at private schools and businesses »

Greenlist: Disappointed with the EPA

Exhaust>> Since the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency refused to let California set its own car emissions standards, California plans to sue the EPA. At least eight other states plan to side with California in the suit.

>> The EPA now wants to exempt factory farms from reporting their levels of air-polluting emissions. "Under a proposal put forth today, commercial livestock operations would not have to report hazardous chemical pollution if the source was animal waste."

>> Enviro-activist and L.A. Urban Ranger Jenny Price makes a compelling case for letting us camp in Malibu. Also worth checking out is Jenny's three-part guide to accessing Malibu: one, two, three. Earlier: Citing wildfire threats, Malibu seeks to ban overnight camping in Malibu parks.

>> Another state beach has become off-limits to the public. The road to Point Sal has been barricaded by the Vandenberg Air Force Base.

Photo courtesy of Getty Images

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c630a53ef00e54fb533908833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Greenlist: Disappointed with the EPA:

Comments
Phil

The EPA is doing nothing to interfere with the existing California vehicle emissions exemption that allows our state to set stricter standards than the Feds. The EPA is resisting California's attempt independently regulate CO2 emissions as an end-run around the federal government on fuel mileage standards. CO2 is *not* a pollutant. It is not only a natural result of even the cleanest combustion, it is the result of every human and animal respiration. CO2 also is vital to plant life. Greens will earn more credibility when they accept that CO2 is not pollution, but we have many other real sources of pollution to curtail. Water and the oceans, not atmospheric CO2, constitute the real environmental urgency.

Siel

Dude -- Your argument about CO2 not being a pollutant because humans breathe it out is like saying humans need water to live therefore tsunamis and floods that kill thousands of people are *not* negative events because they involve water.

Of course people breathe out CO2 -- but that's not even comparable to the CO2 output from factories and cars. You may have missed this, but back in April, the supreme court already ruled that CO2 IS a greenhouse gas that the EPA can regulate.

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In







Our Blogger
Siel
As a teenager, Siel sped past Paramount Studios on the 10 Metro bus to get to Fairfax High School. Now she cuts through the concrete jungle of Los Angeles on her pink Townie bike to shop at local farmers' markets and socialize in pre-loved Prada heels. A contributing editor to BlogHer, Siel also keeps a personal blog, green LA girl. Send your burning green questions to greenlagirl@gmail.com.

Emerald City calendar

All LA Times Blogs

Afterword
All The Rage
Babylon & Beyond
Big Picture
Booster Shots
Brand X
Comments Blog
Company Town
Culture Monster
D.C. Now
Daily Dish
Daily Mirror
Daily Travel & Deal Blog
Dish Rag
Dodger Thoughts
Fabulous Forum
Gold Derby
Greenspace
Hero Complex
Holiday Gift Guide
Homicide Report
Idol Tracker
Jacket Copy
L.A. at Home
L.A. Now
L.A. Unleashed
La Plaza
Lakers
Ministry of Gossip
Money & Co.
Opinion L.A.
Outposts
Pop & Hiss
Readers' Representative
Show Tracker
Technology
Ticket to Vancouver
Top of the Ticket
Varsity Times Insider