Matt Kemp first to score all four of his team's runs in more than 40 years*
Bob Timmermann reports on the historical value of Matt Kemp's feat of scoring all four Dodger runs today:
The last time a player scored four runs to score all of his team's runs for a game was on July 31, 1968 when Dick McAuliffe did it. (Take note of Denny McLain's W-L record at that point.)
Bert Campaneris did it in 1966. That was it for the majors from 1954 to today.
I checked five-run games, but that didn't pan out. I think it's more remarkable that Kemp did it batting out of the No. 7 slot. With a pitcher batting. He had to rely on Brad Ausmus driving him in twice. And scoring on an error.
*Correction: Eric Davis accomplished the feat in 1990.



LAT'ed from the last thread
R.I.P. Frank McCourt
Author of 2 of my favorite books, Angela's Ashes & 'Tis
Posted by: arbfuldodger | July 19, 2009 at 07:57 PM
Great research of the archives (1954-2009)
So 3 stand alone in the "let me score all 4 runs today" quite unusual feat -
Mad Dog, Campy & The Bison. : )
Posted by: Craig88USC | July 19, 2009 at 08:07 PM
Denny McLain started 41 games that year, completed 28, and threw 336 innings. Think we'll ever see that again?
The game has changed so much over the past 30-40 years.
Posted by: Michael | July 19, 2009 at 08:12 PM
It was hot enough I was wondering if anyone would pass out at the game.
Posted by: Marty Leadman | July 19, 2009 at 08:12 PM
Sad to hear about Frank McCourt. Angela's Ashes was a brilliant book.
In another odd, vaguely Dodger-related tangent, I had a bison meatball sandwich for lunch today.
Posted by: DL | July 19, 2009 at 08:14 PM
Juan Castro had scored four times in a game earlier this year for the Dodgers. It was on May 17 and the Dodgers beat Florida 12-5.
The Dodgers have had a player score SIX runs more recently than someone who just stopped at five.
Shawn Green scored six times during his four homer game in Milwaukee on May 23, 2002.
Steve Garvey scored five times in a win over the Cardinals on August 28, 1977 in his famous 5 5 5 5 game. The Dodgers won 11-0 that day.
The last Dodger to score three runs in a game account for all the scoring was Juan Pierre. And that was on May 16 in Florida, a 6-3 loss.
Posted by: Phenomenal Smith | July 19, 2009 at 08:18 PM
Other L.A. Dodgers who have scored three runs in a game to account for all the Dodgers runs in the game are:
Dave Roberts
Adrian Beltre
Davey Lopes
Don Demeter
Posted by: Phenomenal Smith | July 19, 2009 at 08:26 PM
"It was hot enough I was wondering if anyone would pass out at the game."
Yeah, it was really hot today... and my friends and I were in the hottest spot with the least shade: the right field pavilion. Still, a good time was had by all, thanks to the Bison.
Posted by: Telemachos | July 19, 2009 at 08:32 PM
But in the right field pavilion, you had unlimited food. Nothing tastes better on a steaming hot day than about six servings of nachos with an eight hot dog chaser.
Posted by: Phenomenal Smith | July 19, 2009 at 08:38 PM
Whats also remarkable about McAluffe's 4 runs is that he led off the inning everytime. How often does that happen? 21 wins by July 31, amazing
Posted by: dodgerinlv | July 19, 2009 at 08:50 PM
i know this may be inappropriate to bring this up in this thread, but i have been doing some research in regards to the bullpen 'issue' i continue to hear about. there was a post on this blog awhile ago that included a great chart that displayed number of pitches thrown per team by their bullpens. it has been some time since that post so here are some up to date numbers (im only including the five highest teams that have a legitimate shot at making the playoffs):
dodgers: 5205 (2nd place only to the A's)
marlins: 5143
phillies: 5103
astros: 4961
yankees: 4884
so here are my questions:
why does the media always quote number of innings pitched vs. number of pitches thrown?
the dodgers have carried an 8 man pen for much of the season. how many men are in the bullpens of these other teams which i quoted above?
with the phillies only 102 pitches below the dodgers, why are we not hearing about how charlie manuel 'abuses' his bull pen? 102 pitches spread out over 7 men comes out to 15 more pitches thrown per pitcher, just for some perspective.
i know my data is not as complete as the original post that was posted here earlier in the season, but looking at it again helped me confirm what i have always thought; there is not much wrong with this team and the media is making a story out of nothing. Yes the pen has thrown the second highest number of pitches by team in the league, however the dodgers have some depth in the minors if need be, along with kuo very close to coming back. i just thought maybe a few other people would like have this info as well. sorry for being so off topic.
Posted by: matt88 | July 19, 2009 at 08:51 PM
Jubilant victory today while holding the West's Giants & Rockies
(as well as Phillies/Cards for "home field advantage") at bay! : )
NL Standings (Top 7)
LA 58-34
Phila 51-38 . 5 1/2
Frisco. 50-41 . 7 1/2
Colorad 50-42 . 8
SaintLoui 51-43 . 8
ChicagoC. 47-43 . 10
MilwaukeeB 47-45 ..11
Posted by: Craig88USC | July 19, 2009 at 08:53 PM
arbful, when I was between the second and third lines of your post I was in disbelief about the Dodgers' owner being dead.
Posted by: gagne55 | July 19, 2009 at 08:54 PM
A leadoff hitter will still bat first more than anyone else in the lineup because even in AL lineups, the #9 hitter is usually weak.
Denny McLain hit .118 in 1968. The best batting average for any pitcher in 1968 (min 50 PAs) was Rick Wise at .241.
Denny LeMaster of the Astros pulled up the rear, going 2 for 65 on the season
Posted by: Phenomenal Smith | July 19, 2009 at 08:57 PM
I really don't understand that Padres trade at all. Cla Meredith is a middle relief or set up guy but he's a pretty good one, and they didn't even get a young player back for him. Oscar Salazar? What am I missing here?
For the Orioles, they'll probably be dealing Sherrill and/or cutting Baez (or trading if they're fortunate)...
P-Odd-res.
Posted by: underdog | July 19, 2009 at 08:57 PM
"Nothing tastes better on a steaming hot day than about six servings of nachos with an eight hot dog chaser."
Yes. The nachos in particular really cooled everyone off. (Seemed like most people were really taking advantage of all the free ice and water.)
Posted by: Telemachos | July 19, 2009 at 08:57 PM
Some interesting updates and insight from Doug Mientiewicz via his Twitter:
"Oh yea plan is Az wed then tue-fri AAA then back in dodger blue barring a setback"
And about Matt Kemp today, he wrote:
"Matt kemp is a beast!!!"
and also: "He hasn't tap[p]ed 30% of his potential yet"
Posted by: underdog | July 19, 2009 at 09:07 PM
I had no idea Mientiewicz was that close to coming back! I'm looking forward to him being back on the bench.
Posted by: whodat807 | July 19, 2009 at 09:48 PM
Uh, he's not. He separated his shoulder, not tweaked a hammy.
Posted by: Tripon | July 19, 2009 at 09:51 PM
See his tweets that I reposted above, tri. I wouldn't say he's super close to coming back (he also reported on twitter that hitting is now no problem but he's still sore when throwing) but probably sometime in August is not unrealistic. Sounds from his update like he'll be rehabbing soon.
Dodgers could definitely use him back on the bench.
Posted by: underdog | July 19, 2009 at 09:57 PM
New trade idea: If the Dodgers are indeed looking for bullpen help, why not the A's Michael Wuertz? Very solid reliever, great slider.
http://bit.ly/kFVWt
A's have quite a few young arms in the pen. They'd probably like infield help for minors or the ML squad. Hu's stock has fallen too much alas. DeJesus would've been too much to pay and is now injured anyway. Dee Gordon might be too risky to trade away too, but...
Wuertz, I tells ya.
Posted by: underdog | July 19, 2009 at 10:06 PM
Underdog, I think Eyechart is very optimistic about his rehab, to the point where its clouding the timetable his doctors gave him.
Posted by: Tripon | July 19, 2009 at 10:23 PM
Why don't we get Heath Bell for Mitch Jones. It wouldn't be any worse than the other trades the Padres have made.
Posted by: regfairfield | July 19, 2009 at 10:24 PM
Oh he's very likely being overly optimistic as to when, tri, but he's also apparently been making a speedier recovery than expected. So I'd say he'd be back somewhere between when he thinks he will and when the prognosis originally said, if I was betting. Which is why I said mid-August.
Remember this piece?
http://bit.ly/3Ul51
Again, he's probably a bit crazy with his expectations, but seems a month or a bit less isn't too crazy at this point.
Posted by: underdog | July 19, 2009 at 10:32 PM
But the safest bet says here September 1st so I'll probably put a few bucks down on that. ;-)
Posted by: underdog | July 19, 2009 at 10:33 PM
New post up top.
Posted by: Jon Weisman | July 19, 2009 at 10:52 PM
If you ever take the social sciences subset tests CSET
Make sure you look up the economic policies of the Whig party.
Posted by: Tripon | July 19, 2009 at 11:09 PM