Some people want to be angry
Brian Wilson makes a gesture when he does well. Casey Blake homered and mocked Brian Wilson's gesture. Brian Wilson said his gesture honors his religion and his late father -- a revelation to anyone outside the immediate circle of the SanFrancisco Giants fan base. Logic dictates Casey Blake had no idea about this. There is no reason to believe that Casey Blake would go out of his way to mock someone's religion and late father.
So more than 24 hours later, why are some people still upset about this?
Some people want to be angry.
I am writing this not to encourage conversation on the subject. I am writing in the hopes people will let an obvious misunderstanding die.



Mark Grace just mentioned that someone homered off the facade at Chase Field. Come Gracie, that's not even a frieze. It's a scoreboard!
Posted by: maps | May 11, 2009 at 09:18 PM
UDCraig - Yeah you're right but even though the Nats were 6 down again tonight - they do have a little fight in them. Those first 4 hitters they got are pretty good (as we learned the hard way.) And thankyou Reds for sending the DBacks to the cellar 9 back of LA. : )
Posted by: Craig88USC | May 11, 2009 at 09:25 PM
Totally sick of all the religious gestures from all sides. They seem so ostentatious (look how holy I am). And I'm tired of the "God Bless America" every night, too.
It's a ball game. It's not church, it's not a place to take a vow. It's a ball.game.
Let it just be a simple ball game. Please.
Posted by: K2 | May 11, 2009 at 09:30 PM
No one ever said that baseball players were the most refined or mannerly people in the world. It is a rough game, a competitive game, a wearying game. I don't think Blake even knew he was insulting the guy. On the other hand, I've seen guys on the same team insult each other on the field. So, let's not get all Miss Manners about this.
Posted by: Buck18 | May 11, 2009 at 09:30 PM
Jon, I just wanted to take this off day to tell you how much I enjoyed your book. I received it as a Mother's Day present yesterday morning and read it cover to cover. As a rabid Dodger fan who was transplanted to L.A. after the last Championship, it was very interesting to learn all of the back stories I'd heard Vin referring to all these years. My thorough enjoyment of the book took a bit of the sting out of losing to the Giants in 13 :)
Posted by: Jen | May 11, 2009 at 09:48 PM
So Brian Wilson takes a gesture he got from a Mixed Martial Arts clothing company and spins it into his personal salute to Christianity and his late father. That's nice. Good for him.
Personally, I prefer professional wrestling over MMA. I'm making the D-X chop to the groin as my personal salute to epileptic dogs.
So if any Giants fans get mad at me chopping after Broxton shuts them down in August, they must hate epileptic dogs.
Posted by: Keven C | May 11, 2009 at 09:53 PM
The people who want to be angry are usually the people who are already angry. I would guess that Brian Wilson has a lot of anger surrounding his father's death, explaining why he immediately complained to the media about Blake's chest-pumping mockery. He's in pain and wants the world to know about it. Sometimes it's best if that second part of the equation, his wish to get recognition of his suffering, isn't actually fulfilled by writers, bloggers, commentators, etc.
Then again, it's Giants/Dodgers. Personal feuds are the name of the game and I love that there is passion on both sides.
Posted by: Ted | May 11, 2009 at 09:56 PM
Real smart and mature of Blake to ape Wilson after he hits a game-tying HR off him. Shows a LOT of class. But we all know the reason he does it is he hates players who show the other team up. It's just not in him to disrespect opponents after such a feat, unless it's doing something real cool like mimicking a religious gesture or salute to a guy's deceased father. And if he didn't know what it meant, then he shouldn't have gone there. If he did, then he should come out and apologize about it afterward. Same thjing as team members insulting each other - man that's in the family - nothing to do with this case at all. Of all the lame justifications! Plus, that idiotic stunt woke the Giants up and cost the Dodgers the game. Blake is due for a couple of cracked ribs next time he faces a Giant pitcher - and richly deserved.
Posted by: Bruce Mendenhall | May 11, 2009 at 10:27 PM
Bochy just created another X-salute opportunity for Wilson with the cheapest of cheap saves.
Posted by: bigcpa | May 11, 2009 at 10:32 PM
Blake, you do understand that players do not like to be shown up, correct. What Wilson does isnt known to be a tribute to his father and/or religion (heck, its been pointed out here that it is found on an MMA clothing line). Especially after the crap Billy Sadler pulled against the dodgers last year, I can imagine the Dodger players were getting tired of an inferior team showing them up after a rare victory. And really, if you believe that was the cause of the Giants scoring two runs in the 13th, and not, say, Guillermo Mota being on the mound, then I'm not really sure what to tell you. Overall, what you wrote is one of the worst takes I've read on DT, so in that, i thank you for the laugh.
Posted by: ucladodger | May 11, 2009 at 10:33 PM
Bruce, Mota was in the game. That is why the Giants won. I bet Winn does not care and probably barely even knows that closer. That is how locker rooms are.
Posted by: delias man | May 11, 2009 at 10:34 PM
Why shouldn't Casey respond to this even if he knew what the guy says it means? It means absolutely nothing to everyone watching it except for a guy making a goofy gesture. If you can't mock something as stupid as this gesture, what can you mock?
"It’s just me getting a quick message out to the world"
Yeah we get the message, you like to make goofy gestures. Got it.
Posted by: Crash Burn | May 11, 2009 at 10:34 PM
Come on, Casey Blake wasn't directly intending to disrespect his religion and father. It's a rivalry, and he got caught up in it. This is really a non-story.
Posted by: dsm9412 | May 11, 2009 at 10:37 PM
My friend talked me into going to SB to scout Schmidt tomorrow. Never been to a minor league game before. Anything special about that stadium?
Posted by: delias man | May 11, 2009 at 10:42 PM
Bruce, it's too bad you didn't take the time to read Jon's post above, or any of the more level-headed comments on the subject that came here in the previous thread.
Anyway, since Jon wrote "I am writing in the hopes people will let an obvious misunderstanding die", and I feel the same way, onwards and upwards...
Yep, CraigSC, the Nats had some fight in 'em, just couldn't quite come back far enough. They have a good enough lineup now where they could get a win tomorrow. Not that I'm worried about the Giants, because I'm not.
Also, I just caught up on the last 2.5 episodes of The Office, thanks to Tivo. Love it! The last half of this season was especially terrific.
Lastly, back to the Dodgers, new piece up on this very site, from Dylan Hernandez, on Chad B:
"For Dodgers' Chad Billingsley, they were educational games"
http://tinyurl.com/oeuhxb
Posted by: underdog | May 11, 2009 at 10:42 PM
Here's a link to the Dodgers' defensive Fangraphs page- http://tinyurl.com/oxtlj3. As we can all see, its really ugly. Even though it is a small sample size, especially for the defensive side of the ball, it is worth noting that Matt Kemp is our only elite defender. Loney is barely a plus (an improvement over last year), and I would assume Pierre will be a bigger plus after his 50 game stint in left. Even so, Furcal, Hudson, and Ethier grade out pathetically, especially Ethier. All combined, we are one of the 5 worst fielding teams in the game.
Posted by: ucladodger | May 11, 2009 at 10:48 PM
delias man -
It should be a fun game. It's a small stadium and you can get pretty close to the action. A couple seasons ago I went and walked up the day of the game, got seats in the first row behind home plate. Go early and you can watch Schmidt warm up on the 3rd base line with Charlie Hough watching. Since it's a rehab start, you'll probably see Ned or one of the Assistant GM's watching.
Posted by: JJ24 | May 11, 2009 at 10:48 PM
K2 -- hence my opposition to GBA at every single Dodger game. It's a running Rule 5 violation.
Posted by: Rob McMillin | May 11, 2009 at 10:51 PM
"All combined, we are one of the 5 worst fielding teams in the game." Hence my strong feelings that both fangraphs and UZR are seriously overrated and overvalued by some here.
Funny how just about any team's advanced scout will tell you that this year's Dodger team is one of the top 10 fielding teams in baseball. Basically, I disagree.
Posted by: underdog | May 11, 2009 at 10:55 PM
I have my own method for grading defenses. Assign every position a + a - or a 0. If you are below 0, you potentially have a problem. The Dodgers are below 0, but if Furcal can find himself and Loney can continue, they should be adequate.
Posted by: Ted | May 11, 2009 at 11:08 PM
30 something games is a really really small sample size for defense.
Posted by: fanerman | May 11, 2009 at 11:14 PM
Wow, I'm surprised URZ hates Orlando Hudson so much. -4.1 for the year?
Posted by: Tripon | May 11, 2009 at 11:15 PM
I dont see this as a good defensive team any way I look at it, underdog. Basically, the numbers support almost all of what I've witnessed. I was surprised by Hudon's low rating, but everything else seemed about right. Loney is average, Furcal has been awful, Blake is a little below average, Manny is well below average, and Ethier has been really bad in right this year. We've all seen how great Kemp has been, and it shows in the numbers. I've watched a lot of teams this year, and we definitely belong at the bottom when it comes to defensive value.
Posted by: ucladodger | May 11, 2009 at 11:17 PM
Haha, speaking of "wanting to be angry"
http://daveinthecity.podbean.com/2009/05/11/dave-in-the-city-sportstalk-podcast-05-12-09/
Finally! A new podcast, and in it I tear the Lakers, and the Magic a new one.
Oh, and KFC gets some flak too... I'll explain why in the podcast.
Enjoy everyone!
Posted by: LogikReader | May 11, 2009 at 11:21 PM
Thanks JJ. Don't know how early I can get there. Leaving from Westchester at 430. Will post comments from game.
Posted by: delias man | May 11, 2009 at 11:25 PM
I guess my point is more that one month into the season is not the most reliable time to use UZR. I don't think the assessment is that far off the mark for the first month but don't think that is a reliable indicator overall of how the defense will perform over the course of the season. I guess we'll see. Furcal has been well below his usual self, but he also tends to get better in the field and at the plate by June and beyond. Loney has been average. Save a couple of goofs, Hudson has been great, I don't think that's accurate at all. Blake has been average to decent. Save for a couple of goofs (one of which I saw in person, yay!) Kemp has been terrific. Manny and Pierre are both below average to average depending on which part of their defense you're evaluating but either way LF is not strong, and Ethier isn't perfect but he'll get better. Martin and Ausmus have also been getting better over the last week or two. So I would check back with those ratings again in two months. This is a better defense than it's telling you now.
Posted by: underdog | May 11, 2009 at 11:29 PM
L.A Times:
Although anti-doping experts have said HCG is commonly used to replenish testosterone after a cycle of steroids, sources close to Ramirez have suggested the HCG was prescribed to combat issues surrounding sexual performance.
Ramirez is 36. Among men ages 30-39, about 2% have significantly low levels of testosterone, said Dr. Glenn Braunstein, chairman of the Department of Medicine at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center.
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-manny-dodgers12-2009may12,0,5011837.story
Posted by: Alex41592 | May 11, 2009 at 11:34 PM
Reading all this Blake/Wilson stuff makes me despair of the species. It's stuff like this that make me wonder why I even bother with sports anymore.
Posted by: Marty Leadman (LAT) | May 11, 2009 at 11:36 PM
Beats watching many reality TV series at least, Marty. Those will make you really despair for humanity.
Btw, I know this isn't the be all to end all but on ESPN a month ago they published BP's defensive ratings and the Dodgers were ranked #1 in their division at least. Ag
http://tinyurl.com/r8lktn (members only, alas, though when I was able to read it a month ago I recall it not going into great detail, though it singled out Hudson as greatly improving the infield d.)
Posted by: underdog | May 11, 2009 at 11:45 PM
Regarding the Manny story, it said that the common treatment for low testosterone would be testosterone- but would that be legal under MLB policy either?
Posted by: Ted | May 12, 2009 at 12:21 AM
To all Dodger fans who think it's "no big deal" about Blake's mocking gesture... I'm not saying I disagree, but did you feel the same way about Barry Bond's spin-o-rama after belting out that crushing home run a few years ago? No big deal, right?
Go Giants!
Posted by: John Mav | May 12, 2009 at 01:24 AM
To all Dodger fans who think it's "no big deal" about Blake's mocking gesture... I'm not saying I disagree, but did you feel the same way about Barry Bond's spin-o-rama after belting out that crushing home run a few years ago? No big deal, right?
Go Giants!
Posted by: John Mav | May 12, 2009 at 01:24 AM
Who's better up the middle defensively ??? Who's better than the trio of Bison, Raffy & O-Dog ??? (Now I know someone will come up with an answer. But I'm sticking with what I've seen.) I do think that Loney could use a little Wes Parker tutoring though. We got a problem in left for sure but 'Dre is excellent in right. And losing weight has seemed to help Martin come around. All in all I say we have a pretty good defense. Ask our pitchers.
Posted by: Craig88USC | May 12, 2009 at 01:34 AM
I would think more highly of Casey Blake if he had intended to mock Wilson's faith. Religion should be mocked when it is invoked so frivolously. I knew something bad was going to happen to the the Dodgers after last Wednesday night's game. When asked if it was extra special to make his first Major League appearance in a record setting game, Brent Leach responded that it was a gift from his lord and savior, Jesus Christ. My hand slapped against my forehead and I thought, "That man's lord and savior is going to do something bad to the Dodgers." Daily food, health, being able to watch your children grow up healthy and happy, these are all gifts from G-d. Winning a baseball game is not. If you think it is, keep it to yourself or you will be mocked.
Posted by: Hobo Ambush | May 12, 2009 at 01:56 AM
Since the Dodgers are playin' in Philly - Here's the "Lost" creator drilling the gang... http://www.hulu.com/watch/29313/its-always-sunny-in-philadelphia-sunny-goes-to-comic-con.
Posted by: Craig88USC | May 12, 2009 at 02:32 AM
the gesture is lame and where he got the idea from is moronic. if he wants to honor his dad or religion, he can do it at home and not make it a public spectacle. if he brings it to the field, it's fair game. what a baby.
Posted by: casey | May 12, 2009 at 04:24 AM
If sitting in the dugout mostly out of sight and crossing one's arms is insulting and deserves to have ribs cracked as one poster said, where does beating the Cowboys in Dallas and then dancing on their Star in the middle of the field rate as an insult?
Posted by: Fred | May 12, 2009 at 04:28 AM
I seriously thought we were talking about the lead singer of the Beach Boys.
Posted by: Tim | May 12, 2009 at 05:16 AM
Man its baseball, this stuff happens all the time, weren't there shenanigans recently after someone touched off Joba Chamberlin? I know its a dedication to his father, and may have crossed some lines, but in the real world, people disrespect monuments to figures of history, and I dont see this much outrage. Giants fans can get out raged, its a bit extreme, but they can, but it should be handled between the Giants and Dodgers, and mainly Brian and Casey. And it should end there.
Posted by: SteelMohawk | May 12, 2009 at 06:23 AM
Seems to me that we looked at the defensive stats about two weeks in the season and the Dodgers were performing quite well. That these numbers have deteriorated over the past couple of weeks certainly reflects what I have been seeing.
Posted by: Bob Hendley | May 12, 2009 at 06:45 AM
John Mav | May 12, 2009 at 01:24 AM
I had no recollection of Barry's "spin-o-rama" until Bill Plaschke brought it up a couple years ago. It had absolutely no impact that I can recall. There hasn't been a time that I thought it was any kind of deal, let alone a big deal.
Posted by: Jon Weisman | May 12, 2009 at 06:59 AM
Recent events have overshadowed this, but I am starting to get excited by the rematch with the Phillies.
Posted by: Bob Hendley | May 12, 2009 at 07:11 AM
UZR is completely meaningless until at least half way through the season and it's really recommended you use numbers from multiple seasons. At this stage in the season, UZR is more of a measure of how many balls get more balls hit directly at you when you're cheating to one side.
Posted by: regfairfield | May 12, 2009 at 07:22 AM
Amazingly, the Phillies pitching staff has a HR/9 ratio of 1.84 so far this season. That's awful! And so far this season it's not all due to it's hitter friendly ballpark. The number is 1.87 at home and 1.80 on the road.
vr, Xei
Posted by: Xeifrank | May 12, 2009 at 07:56 AM
Delias man, I'll be at the Schmidt game in San Bernardino as well. Email me if you want to meet up: eric d stephen at gmail dot com (all together).
Posted by: Eric Stephen | May 12, 2009 at 08:05 AM
Whenever I have a successful result when playing basketball, poker, bowling, or whatever, I like to jump up and down repeatedly, pump my fists, and yell, "I'm the best! You all suck!" over and over.
However, I do this to honor my religion and my father, who passed away several years ago. Anyone who mocks my tribute is therefore insulting my religion and my dead father.
Posted by: DL | May 12, 2009 at 08:06 AM
Are Furcal & Loney under performing or is it more a true statement of their current talent level? Furcal is over 30 & has injuries issues, while Loney is showing the same lack of power now that he showed in the minor leagues.
Likewise, it'd seem Ethier/Hudson are over performing, yet could it be that its their true talent level and their performance is sustainable?
Blake, Kemp, Martin - meeting expectations.
Ethier, Hudson - exceeding expectations
Loney, Furcal - not meeting expectations.
Fair to say?
The difference in the offense this year over last year is Hudson over Kent, and obviously Manny over Pierre.
Posted by: Jack | May 12, 2009 at 08:22 AM
Bob Hendley - it difficult to determine whether its good defense or good luck in explaining random fluctuations in BABIP.
Posted by: Jack | May 12, 2009 at 08:25 AM
The bench has also been a pleasant surprise.
Posted by: kinbote | May 12, 2009 at 08:28 AM
I would put Martin, .393 OBP and all, in the underperforming category as well.
Posted by: Eric Stephen | May 12, 2009 at 08:29 AM
Jack,
There was a Fox Sports article the other day talking about how Manny is the one making the bid difference compared to last year, but that Hudson in place of Kent is making the difference
Small sample size for sure
Posted by: Kevin Lewis | May 12, 2009 at 08:33 AM
Martin should be at the top of the lineup. I think we've seen enough of him to reasonably conclude for the time being that he's better at OBPing than SLGing.
Posted by: D4P | May 12, 2009 at 08:36 AM
Marty,
This one is for you... Best Sandwich places in Pasadena?
Posted by: Kevin Lewis | May 12, 2009 at 08:37 AM
New post up top.
Posted by: Jon Weisman | May 12, 2009 at 08:37 AM
Who's better than the trio of Bison, Raffy & O-Dog ???
How about Rollins, Utley, and Victorino?
Reyes, Castillo and Beltran?
Hudson has been a gold glover as advertised, but Raffy has been mediocre at best. Kemp is going to be better than all the rest, but he's still not there yet.
Posted by: SaMo | May 12, 2009 at 09:01 AM