Grand Canyon Dodgers
Things have changed since Vero Beach 1948.
According to Carrie Watters and Rebekah L. Sanders of the Arizona Republic, the cost of the new Glendale, Arizona spring training facility - Camelback Ranch - has jumped to nine figures.
Glendale's spring training complex for the Los Angeles Dodgers and Chicago White Sox is on track to open in February. But the cost, originally pegged around $80.7 million, sits closer to an Arizona Republic estimate of $115 million, with an additional $40 million for nearby infrastructure.
The facility's price jump came with additions such as stone façades on buildings, pools in the clubhouses, the shape of the facility's manmade river, and rising costs such as cost of materials and code compliance issues, according to the city and builder. Of that $115 million, the teams will chip in $7.2 million. ...
* * *
Nearly three years ago, we learned that former Dodger minor leaguer Mike Nixon had traded his glove for a spot on defense with the Arizona State football team. Nixon, now 25, last night scored one of the Sun Devils' record-tying four defensive touchdowns in a 34-9 victory over UCLA.
According to this Jeff Metcalfe story in the Republic, Nixon got a $1 million signing bonus from the Dodgers that lured him away from ... UCLA. Nixon was a third-round pick in the 2002 draft, chosen 420 players ahead of Russell Martin (as this year-old recap of the 2002 draft by Diamond Leung of the Press-Enterprise indicates).
Here's an excerpt from a 2002 Scout.com brief on Nixon:
Nixon told AZCentral.com that he made the decision to give up his football scholarship with no regrets. "I'll miss it, but I'm not going to look back at all," he said. "I made my decision. If I have a bad game, I'm not going to think maybe I should be playing football. It won't be like that."
Sometimes, regrets are for the best.
* * *
Angel Berroa is a candidate for Oddity of the Year honors. (Thanks to Dodger Thoughts commenter D4P for the link.)
* * *
Branch Rickey with his grandson in Vero Beach, 1948. All three of today's photos are from the Life magazine online archive and were taken by George Silk.



1.  If I heard Sean McDonough correctly last night, he said Nixon's problem in the minors was that he was poor defensively.
But he didn't appear to be hitting the cover off the ball:
http://minors.baseball-reference.com/players.cgi?pid=10499
Posted by: Bob Timmermann | November 29, 2008 at 08:30 AM
2.  http://sportsblogs.latimes.com/sports_baseball_dodgers/2008/11/the-morning-aft.html#more
Brian Kamenetzky responds to the latest Dodgers comments with an eloquent response.
Posted by: Tripon | November 29, 2008 at 09:40 AM
3.  Jim Healy would have been a happy man after reading the following quote in today's Times. Jimmy Clausen, on the Notre Dame football team performance this year, "We've been consistent here and there."
Posted by: Strike4 | November 29, 2008 at 11:12 AM
4.  3
That LA Times article was written by a former Times intern who writes for the Notre Dame student paper.
I guess having a Chicago Tribune reporter cover it would have cost too much.
Posted by: Bob Timmermann | November 29, 2008 at 11:19 AM
5.  Before clicking on the link I assumed the oddity was simply Angel Berroa making it back to the majors and holding down a job. I'd forgotten about the ball-in-the-shirt trick.
Posted by: Eric Enders | November 29, 2008 at 11:54 AM
6.  Is Berroa banking on the Dodgers bringing him back?
Posted by: Tripon | November 29, 2008 at 12:06 PM
7.  The American banking system is more secure than Angel Berroa banking on anything.
Posted by: Bob Timmermann | November 29, 2008 at 12:11 PM
8.  Reelly enjoy going through those Life archives. One of my favorite shots is one of Roseboro looking at Campy while listening intenly. The intensity in John's eyes is telling.
Posted by: 68elcamino427 | November 29, 2008 at 12:16 PM
9.  Berroa's hoping to get bailed out again by the Ned.
Posted by: D4P | November 29, 2008 at 12:24 PM
10.  I'm guessing today Eric Enders is a big Baylor fan. Eric Stephen is rooting for Oregon. I'm just rooting for chaos.
Posted by: Bob Timmermann | November 29, 2008 at 12:44 PM
11.  To which bowl is the 4th place Pac-10 team likely to be invited?
Posted by: D4P | November 29, 2008 at 12:48 PM
12.  11 Sun Bowl? If you think both Oregon St. and USC are going to BCS bowls.
Posted by: Tripon | November 29, 2008 at 12:50 PM
13.  If both USC and OSU are in the BCS, then the 4th place team would go to El Paso for the Sun Bowl.
But bowls can trade teams around.
It's not really "4th place team", but rather "fourth pick."
Posted by: Bob Timmermann | November 29, 2008 at 12:50 PM
14.  Would you rather go to the Holiday Bowl, or the Sun Bowl?
Posted by: Tripon | November 29, 2008 at 12:56 PM
15.  With all due respect to Mr. Enders, nobody wants to go to El Paso.
Posted by: Bob Timmermann | November 29, 2008 at 12:57 PM
16.  Yeah. They didn't call it "El Stayo", or "El Hangaroundo".
Posted by: D4P | November 29, 2008 at 01:08 PM
17.  So if Oklahoma and Texas Tech both win, who wins the division. H2H is tied in that situation. Does it go by W% of conference opponents?
Posted by: Gagne55 | November 29, 2008 at 01:08 PM
18.  Comparing schedules, Texas Tech and Oklahoma had the same conference schedule. Texas played Colorado and Missouri instead of Kansas St. and Nebraska.
Posted by: Gagne55 | November 29, 2008 at 01:18 PM
19.  Colorado and Kansas St. have the same conference record. Missouri and Nebraska have the same conference record.
Posted by: Gagne55 | November 29, 2008 at 01:19 PM
20.  17
The tiebreaker is higher ranking in the BCS.
Posted by: Bob Timmermann | November 29, 2008 at 01:34 PM
21.  UCLA's futility even makes it on DT.
Posted by: trainwreck | November 29, 2008 at 01:38 PM
22.  I found the UCLA-ASU game somewhat humorous after a while.
Posted by: Bob Timmermann | November 29, 2008 at 01:42 PM
23.  Baylor's place kicker is on Eric's list.
Posted by: bhsportsguy | November 29, 2008 at 01:49 PM
24.  There's no renegade feed of the Baylor-TTU game.
Posted by: Bob Timmermann | November 29, 2008 at 01:50 PM
25.  21 The sad reality is that the best UCLA QB on the field next week maybe Rick Neuheisal.
Posted by: bhsportsguy | November 29, 2008 at 01:51 PM
26.  I can't remember the last time USC was on ESPN. It may have been the game at Nebraska a few years back. Either that or the game at BYU in 2005.
Posted by: Eric Stephen | November 29, 2008 at 01:55 PM
27.  25
Rick's plan to have all the recruits come for USC weekend is going to be a very bad mistake.
Posted by: trainwreck | November 29, 2008 at 01:56 PM
28.  I wonder if Plaxico Burress secured a guest appearance on the next season of CBS's "Worst Week."
Posted by: Eric Stephen | November 29, 2008 at 01:57 PM
29.  26 - Oregon State this year, ASU last year.
FSU is so inept on offense, it's making me sick. Whatever slim BCS hopes we have are washing away in the Florida rain. Ponder is terrible.
Posted by: oshea2002 | November 29, 2008 at 01:58 PM
30.  27
Sort of like trying to recruit guys for the Army by offering them a trip to Baghdad.
Posted by: Bob Timmermann | November 29, 2008 at 01:58 PM
31.  29
C'mon you saw Kevin Craft play last night!
Posted by: Bob Timmermann | November 29, 2008 at 01:59 PM
32.  31 - I'm not sure who the worst QB is in D-1. Craft, Jarrett Lee at LSU, and Chris Smelley at S. Carolina are all in the discussion.
Posted by: oshea2002 | November 29, 2008 at 02:00 PM
33.  29
See how successfully I've blocked out the OSU game? :)
I was thinking the thanksgiving ASU game was ABC but I think you're right.
Posted by: Eric Stephen | November 29, 2008 at 02:02 PM
34.  30 Actually, I don't think it matters, there was not a recruiting bonus when UCLA won in 2006. And most recruiting experts say that 18 year olds always think that they can change things once they arrive at college.
Posted by: bhsportsguy | November 29, 2008 at 02:10 PM
35.  With UF up big (I would like to point out that with UGA going down, UF hasn't beaten anyone of relevance this year), the path to the NC will have to go through the Big 12. If Baylor can hang on here v. Texas Tech, it's a start. I hate Mizzou's chances v. Texas though.
Posted by: oshea2002 | November 29, 2008 at 02:11 PM
36.  34
The bonus came in the following class. All those guys committed early.
Posted by: trainwreck | November 29, 2008 at 02:12 PM
37.  35
I have been saying that about Alabama all year and I said their best win would mean less when GT beats Georgia.
Down with the SEC!
Posted by: trainwreck | November 29, 2008 at 02:12 PM
38.  Since the days of Red at UCLA has there been ever been a bigger gap between USC and UCLA on the football field?
Would it require a real miracle for UCLA to beat USC in the football game this year?
Ring "The Bell"!
Posted by: 68elcamino427 | November 29, 2008 at 02:13 PM
39.  32
Ronnie Fouch and Kevin Lopina make those guys look Joe Montana clones.
Posted by: Bob Timmermann | November 29, 2008 at 02:16 PM
40.  Joe Montana clones
White guys who can neither run nor throw...?
Posted by: D4P | November 29, 2008 at 02:24 PM
41.  An unranked UCLA team has only defeated a USC team in the top 5 twice: 1959 and 2006. Both were low-scoring games, 10-3 and 13-9.
UCLA would need another game with a score like that to have a prayer. However, the 1959 and 2006 Bruins were a lot better than this year's squad.
Posted by: Bob Timmermann | November 29, 2008 at 02:24 PM
42.  Recruiting also follows on field results in the next class.
Posted by: oshea2002 | November 29, 2008 at 02:25 PM
43.  meant always, not also.
Posted by: oshea2002 | November 29, 2008 at 02:25 PM
44.  41 - This is the first time I can ever remember thinking we have no chance of losing either of the ND or UCLA games. ND has some talent, but they are so poorly coached.
Posted by: oshea2002 | November 29, 2008 at 02:35 PM
45.  Baylor now up 28-14 on Texas Tech in the 3rd, so much for the last week an the 9,000 three-way tie arguments.
Posted by: oshea2002 | November 29, 2008 at 02:40 PM
46.  The best scenario that could happen to UCLA is if Weis is fired and Carroll goes to coach the Niners.
Posted by: trainwreck | November 29, 2008 at 02:44 PM
47.  46 - and then to replace Carroll, we hire Weis.
Posted by: oshea2002 | November 29, 2008 at 02:53 PM
48.  30 That actually works. Army and National Guard recruiting has actually been up in recent years, with both services exceeding recruiting goals. There are still patriotic people in this country.
Posted by: Indiana Jon | November 29, 2008 at 03:02 PM
49.  Has Rosenthal reported that the Padres are close to trading Peavy straight up for Jered Weaver of the Angels? Someone told me that at a football game last night.
Has anyone at DT wished our esteemed announcer a happy 81st birthday? Happy birthday, Vin Scully, if you're reading this. (Happy birthday even if you are not.)
Posted by: Benjamin Miracord | November 29, 2008 at 03:03 PM
50.  48
So people are joining the Army instead of playing the O-line for UCLA?
I knew it!
Posted by: Bob Timmermann | November 29, 2008 at 03:15 PM
51.  Texas fans now need to root for Oklahoma and then Missouri.
Posted by: Bob Timmermann | November 29, 2008 at 03:49 PM
52.  51 No way. We root for Oklahoma State. An Okie St. win would send Texas Tech to the Big 12 championship but the Longhorns to the national championship game.
Posted by: Eric Enders | November 29, 2008 at 04:02 PM
53.  Well, lets go Beavers!
I think Texas' better shot is OU loses, then Tech loses to Mizzou. I think that still gets them in, especially if Oregon wins. Missouri is simply not capable of beating OU, so I think Texas needs to cheer for something else.
Posted by: oshea2002 | November 29, 2008 at 04:03 PM
54.  53 The beauty of it is that if OU loses, the Big 12 championship game becomes meaningless. Tech could beat Mizzou and it still wouldn't matter; the Longhorns would be in.
Posted by: Eric Enders | November 29, 2008 at 04:05 PM
55.  Well we now know that whomever wins the SEC championship will be part of the BCS title game.
Missouri's loss at home does not bode well for whomever they play in the Big 12 title game and probably whatever Big 12 team that does not go to the title game will still be ranked ahead of USC so even if Missouri wins the automatic berth, the other one loss team will go ahead of USC.
Posted by: bhsportsguy | November 29, 2008 at 04:08 PM
56.  53 There's a good shot that Utah could move ahead of USC in the BCS standings this week.
Posted by: bhsportsguy | November 29, 2008 at 04:09 PM
57.  27
According to some at BRO, Neuheisel/Chow are trying to sell recruits on the idea that they will play as true freshman if they are good; in that context being helpless against USC is theoretically not a bad thing.
The problem is that not many kids may buy into that. Or to a secondary selling point of an invitation to be part of turning the program around.
I might commit for immediate playing time as a recruit, but not being part of righting the ship...
Posted by: Samhain | November 29, 2008 at 04:10 PM
58.  54 - I think most likely they probably would be then. I'm not 100% sure though, alot could change, especially if USC and Tech both win their conferences. As other teams lose, computer advantages that Texas has will narrow. I think what would help Texas is that certain people will want Texas #2, while others will say it should be Tech or USC, a conf champ. But if they both win, they may split votes. I think an Oregon win here and a Tech loss to Mizzou would seal it for Texas though. This conference champ argument won't apply to Penn State since everyone hates the Big 10.
Posted by: oshea2002 | November 29, 2008 at 04:11 PM
59.  55 Do we? There is still a scenario where Florida wins the SEC and the NCG is OU vs. Texas.
Posted by: Eric Enders | November 29, 2008 at 04:11 PM
60.  55/56 - USC has been hurt in the computers v. Utah and the Big 10 teams b/c they've only played 10 games. Right now they have 3 less wins then Utah. That will flip after next weekend. Also, the loser of Bama / UF is likely to fall behind USC, but still above Utah.
Posted by: oshea2002 | November 29, 2008 at 04:13 PM
61.  59 - the voters will never allow that. Florida will be the #1 team in both polls after they beat Bama next week, and while the Big 12 teams have computers advantages that I guess whoever is #2 in the polls could pass UF, whoever is #3 certainly won't. I saw that article, but once Bama and UF both won huge today, that scenario I think went out the window.
Posted by: oshea2002 | November 29, 2008 at 04:15 PM
62.  To be precise, Missouri didn't lose at home. The Border No Longer a War Football Game is played at Arrowhead Stadium in Kansas City.
Posted by: Bob Timmermann | November 29, 2008 at 04:16 PM
63.  I think the bottom line for Texas is that Mizzou simply has no chance v. OU. If OU is gonna lose before their bowl game, it will only be tonight. So therefore I think they need the Pokes to pull it off tonight.
Posted by: oshea2002 | November 29, 2008 at 04:19 PM
64.  49 - Last year I did. I missed it this year. It's Ross' birthday too.
Posted by: Jon Weisman | November 29, 2008 at 04:20 PM
65.  Alright, time for some basketball.
Forget this football stuff. Not our forte.
Posted by: trainwreck | November 29, 2008 at 04:31 PM
66.  Oregon State really likes running the fly sweep. Or else the Versus guys just like saying "fly sweep."
Posted by: Bob Timmermann | November 29, 2008 at 04:43 PM
67.  66 - w/o Quizz they are gonna run that all night.
Posted by: oshea2002 | November 29, 2008 at 04:53 PM
68.  My guess is USC doesn't cover tonight.
Posted by: Marty | November 29, 2008 at 04:56 PM
69.  63 While I would agree with you that Missouri has no chance against Oklahoma, others here will correct you and say that in a game with any two teams from major conferences, there is a 1 in 40 chance of the bad team winning. With Missouri somehow ranked, they claim that it's a much higher probability.
Posted by: Indiana Jon | November 29, 2008 at 05:00 PM
70.  Notre Dame looks real good so far tonight. That may change after kick off though.
Posted by: Indiana Jon | November 29, 2008 at 05:02 PM
71.  "A rare miss for Justin Kahut..."
He was 14 of 20 on field goals and had missed a PAT the week before.
Posted by: Bob Timmermann | November 29, 2008 at 05:04 PM
72.  It's just not right that Duck fans have to prefer finishing behind USC rather than tied with them.
Posted by: D4P | November 29, 2008 at 05:07 PM
73.  I just heard the story of how Texas Tech found their kicker. What a great story.
Posted by: Indiana Jon | November 29, 2008 at 05:08 PM
74.  Clausen has set the standard for Craft next week on how soon to get picked off.
Posted by: Bob Timmermann | November 29, 2008 at 05:09 PM
75.  I'm officially jumping off the Oregon State bandwagon.
So long and thanks for playing OSU.
Posted by: Bob Timmermann | November 29, 2008 at 05:10 PM
76.  Mike Bellotti seems shocked that his kicker could get called for a horse collar tackle.
Posted by: Bob Timmermann | November 29, 2008 at 05:17 PM
77.  ESPN Gamecast is telling me that Mark Sanchez completed a pass for 4813 yards to Damian Williams for a touchdown.
Posted by: D4P | November 29, 2008 at 05:18 PM
78.  ESPN Gamecast is also reporting the following:
Matt Evensen kickoff for 59 yards returned by James Rodgers for a loss of 460 yards to the Oregn (sic) 30. Oregon penalty 515 yard personal foul accepted.
Posted by: D4P | November 29, 2008 at 05:21 PM
79.  Which brand has the best reputation for making good LCD TVs?
Posted by: trainwreck | November 29, 2008 at 05:30 PM
80.  Oregon with a mere 359 yards of total offense in the first half.
Posted by: D4P | November 29, 2008 at 05:33 PM
81.  Let me shill for the SEC. I hate Alabama with a passion ,being an Auburn fan(said with a paper bag over my head). I expect Florida to beat down the Tide and play in and likely win the NC game. On the other hand if Alabama beats Florida, I have to admit they're for real and have a chance at capturing the old Bama magic.
Posted by: preacherroe | November 29, 2008 at 05:34 PM
82.  Yahoo gives Oregon 358 yards.
Posted by: Bob Timmermann | November 29, 2008 at 05:34 PM
83.  Could be a bad day for orange-hued OSUs.
Posted by: Bob Timmermann | November 29, 2008 at 05:36 PM
84.  Sanchez completed two consecutive passes that netted -15?
Posted by: Bob Timmermann | November 29, 2008 at 05:40 PM
85.  Oregon sure can run the football
Posted by: D4P | November 29, 2008 at 05:43 PM
86.  Now at 445 yards of total offense, in the first half.
Posted by: D4P | November 29, 2008 at 05:43 PM
87.  The good people of Corvallis will love spending the holidays in San Diego.
And now we'll get to see Ohio State in a BCS bowl! Woo hoo!
Posted by: Bob Timmermann | November 29, 2008 at 05:46 PM
88.  I don't think Mike Riley has a decided schematic advantage.
Posted by: Bob Timmermann | November 29, 2008 at 05:49 PM
89.  I stepped away briefly when the Ducks took a 30-10 lead, and came back to a 37-10 lead.
Posted by: D4P | November 29, 2008 at 05:49 PM
90.  37-17.
Posted by: Bob Timmermann | November 29, 2008 at 05:49 PM
91.  I'm prepared to project that USC will win this football game.
Posted by: Andrew Shimmin | November 29, 2008 at 05:51 PM
92.  I stepped away briefly when the Ducks took a 37-10 lead, and came back to a 37-17 lead.
Posted by: D4P | November 29, 2008 at 05:52 PM
93.  The good people of Corvallis will love spending the holidays in San Diego
Don't the good people of Eugene get the Holiday Bowl...?
Posted by: D4P | November 29, 2008 at 05:53 PM
94.  It depends if the Sun Bowl doesn't want to have Oregon come two years in a row.
Or if UCLA doesn't beat USC.
You can stop laughing now.
Posted by: Bob Timmermann | November 29, 2008 at 05:57 PM
95.  Golden State Warriors score 64 first-half points against the Knicks, and give up 82, a Madison Square Garden record.
Posted by: Icaros | November 29, 2008 at 05:59 PM
96.  It was looking good for a while, but it now appears that UCLA will allow more than 30 points for the second straight night.
Posted by: Jon Weisman | November 29, 2008 at 06:00 PM
97.  Notre Dame's lineman tried to do the thing he saw BC's guy do this afternoon, hurdling an offensive lineman.
Didn't work.
Posted by: Andrew Shimmin | November 29, 2008 at 06:00 PM
98.  At least one of the orange OSUs is playing well today. One of them appears to have a defense.
Posted by: Bob Timmermann | November 29, 2008 at 06:00 PM
99.  I think this is the first SC game I've watched this year. Their defense is really fast.
Posted by: Andrew Shimmin | November 29, 2008 at 06:06 PM
100.  Their punt returner is pretty fast, too.
Posted by: Andrew Shimmin | November 29, 2008 at 06:09 PM