A retrospective: Los Angeles Ballet turns 5

Institutions are living beings with their own distinct energies and auras. Watching one appear, grow, stumble, recover and mature can be a fascinating spectacle.

I don't know anyone personally at Los Angeles Ballet, but when I was asked to write a five-year retrospective on the company, I found myself producing more of an advocacy piece than I had intended.

That surprised me.

I first watched Los Angeles Ballet as staff dance critic at The Times, reviewing its inaugural performances. But before that I reported on its formation and initial plans, along with those of two other ballet companies that failed to get off the ground.

I watch it now as a civilian, not uncritically but with an investment in years. In a way, I am part of its history. That doesn't make what I have to say important, but it is informed by seeing what a lot of other companies were dancing in the Southland during the same five years and balancing their achievements against those of this struggling, can-do local entity.

Click here to run my analysis of Los Angeles Ballet.

-- Lewis Segal

Photo: The Los Angeles Ballet 's February performance of "Serenade." Credit: Los Angeles Times.

 

Comments

[Caite Lorber]

Dear Mr. Segal,

Today's piece was both informative and fair. Those of us who love ballet, and appreciate Los Angeles Ballet's efforts, appreciate your keeping an eye on the company. We miss your very informed views, and reviews in the Times.

In seeing at the company's projected budget, which appears incredibly small for a company of this size, its no wonder their marketing efforts are modest. LA is perhaps THE most media saavy city in the world, and without a pretty substantial marketing campaign, getting the word out must be daunting. Great dancing helps. Articles such as the one you just produced will certainly help too...and as a fan I thank you!

CL

[kendan]

and so say all of us