« Previous | Culture Monster Home | Next »

Destroyed Apple products become photographic works of art

November 15, 2010 |  9:00 am

 

Iphone When does an iPhone or an iPad cease to be a mere consumer gadget and enter the rarefied world of visual art? How about when someone willfully destroys it, turning it into an abstract, brutalized husk of its former self?

A series of smashed, mangled, shot up and melted Apple products are the subject of a recent photography project by a San Francisco-area graphic designer who said he's trying to make people think about their relationship with these universally beloved gadgets.

Michael Tompert said he had spent the last several months purchasing the newest in Apple consumer technology and then creatively destroying the pricey toys. The results, which he photographed, briefly went on display at a gallery exhibition that ran over the weekend at the small Live Worms Gallery in San Francisco. (The art show was first reported on the site Cult of Mac.)

Speaking on the phone, Tompert said the idea for the project came to him after he gave each of his two sons an iPod touch for Christmas. He said the two boys fought over one of the devices, which had a certain game on it. Fed up with the quarrel, Tompert said he grabbed one of the iPods and smashed it on the ground.

"They were kind of stunned -- the screen was broken and this liquid poured out of it. I got my camera to shoot it," Tompert said. "My wife told me that I should do something with it."

In all, Tompert created 12 images of destroyed Apple products, working with his friend Paul Fairchild, a photographer. "They had to be a brand-new product," Tompert said. "It's not about destroying old products. It's about our relationship with the new."

His methods of destruction varied by gadget. To destroy an iPhone 3G device (seen above), he used a Heckler & Koch handgun to blow a hole through it. To obliterate a set of iPod Nanos, he placed the devices on a train track so that a locomotive would run over them. (See an image of them after the jump.)

The most difficult product to obliterate was the iPad -- "it's practically indestructible," Tompert said.

Ipad He said the iPad (seen right) withstood blows from a sledgehammer and other blunt tools. In the end, he used a soldering torch to heat the insides of the iPad until they started to boil and the device exploded.

Perhaps ironically, Tompert is a former Apple employee. He said he had nothing but admiration for the company's products. "I've been an Apple fan from Day 1," he said. (Tompert, who hails from Germany, currently works as a graphic designer and specializes in CGI technology.)

Some people may think it crazy to purchase new, expensive technology products only to destroy them. Tompert said the photography project was intended to be humorous and tongue in cheek. At the same time, he wanted people to think more deeply about their relationship to these ubiquitous devices.

"They're designed to be so bare-boned and simple -- like the monolith in '2001' -- and everyone
is going crazy around it," he said. "I wanted to say relax, let's see what's in it."

From an art critic's point of view, the destroyed gadgets contain strains of Dadaism and Surrealism. Everyday products are turned on themselves and made to seem unfamiliar again.  Or as RenĂ© Magritte might have said, "Ceci n'est pas un iPhone."

-- David Ng

Nanos

Photos: Michael Tompert and Paul Fairchild

RECENT AND RELATED:

Finalist in Guggenheim's YouTube Play competition finds a use for WikiLeaks

Why Rainn Wilson Hates LACMA (and other 'Cell Phone Stories')

Hollywood Bowl gets its own smartphone app

L.A. architect Christophe Cornubert's carbon-dioxide cube debuts in Copenhagen

 

 
Comments () | Archives (9)

Now if this isnt representative of the Meist, Consumerist, self-absorbed yuppie set i dont know what is. This aint art, its a vanity mirror of a small and disconnected subsect of society. It means nothing, except a memership into the Meist cult.

Beyond boring, just plain stupid for pseudo intellectuals.

Save the spiritual, humanity binding Watts Towers(Nuestro Pueblo) tear down the self-absorbed, splintering for market share Ivories.

I find it an interesting commentary on people's attachment to inanimate objects, commercial products to be sure, but not unlike some people's attachment to outsider art objects like Rodia's Watts Towers...

Maybe they should throw a few off the "dormitories" for the workers in China who make these handsets!

Since they have a problem with the workers committing suicide by jumping out the windows of these dorms because of poor working conditions, I think that would bring more meaning to the art.

In fact, I wonder if the readers and users of mobile handsets in general understand the conditions under which these very cool pieces of technology are made?

Foxconn is the company 900,000 employees plus (that's just Apple). The Pearl River Delta is where the economic boom is happening - and Apple is not the worst employer by far.

must be windows fans

Screw those hungry children!

To hell with the poor!

In this economy, this comes across as a real selfish act, not to mention some of the worst art I have ever encountered.

Donald, thank you for instructing the rest of us what does and does not constitute 'art.' I feel much more enlightened now that a complete stranger in an Internet forum has told me what to think.

Nuestro Pueblo is no more "outsider" art than that by Rousseau, Monet, Cezanne, Gauguin, Van Gogh, Picasso, Braque, Klee...... On second thought, maybe it is, as it seems only "outsider" of the self-absorbed, careerist, decadent academies can produce true creative art.

And somebody needs to define what the various arts are, fine, contempt, and creative, as the art schools are like bad parents, and won't tell their children" No, don't do that, do this" to become responsible, committed, hardworking adults.

You may or may not like this, thats irrelevant and up to each person. But creative art, it ain't.

art collegia delenda est
Fine art colleges must be destroyed.

Well, all I can say is that nano picture is pretty!! Love it.

Why photos, why not the objects themselves? That would be hot "art" -- (with the radiation and all.) Keep filling galleries with garbage, busted up snuff is cool, great way to recycle, save the landfills.


Advertisement
Connect

Recommended on Facebook


In Case You Missed It...

Video


Explore the arts: See our interactive venue graphics



Advertisement

Tweets and retweets from L.A. Times staff writers.


Categories


Archives