James Franco carries on the Warholian marriage of celebrity and art -- and who else?
Andy Warhol was the first modern artist to obliterate the line between celebrity culture and the art world. Today, no other star inhabits that fuzzy demilitarized zone better than James Franco.
Since escaping from the teen-idol ghetto, Franco has turned his celebrity status into a living, breathing work of art. Most recently, he embarked on a project with L.A.'s Museum of Contemporary Art in which he filmed an episode of the soap opera "General Hospital," playing an artist named Franco.
His other projects include abstract video works, sleeping in class, making weird proclamations in public and playing doppelganger to performance-art doyenne Marina Abramovic.
There has been an orgy of media coverage to satisfy Francophiles of all stripes. (A recent umpteen-thousand-word profile in New York magazine has surely thrilled the actor's publicists to no end.) Of course, publicity is almost certainly part of the ruse here. Like Warhol, Franco knows how to use the media as an adjunct to his sprawling, constantly redefining project of the self.
But Franco isn't unique in his attempt to bend his celebrity profile in avant-garde directions. Here's a short list of other stars who have dared to deviate from the Hollywood norm by placing their careers (deliberately or not) under a deconstructive lens.
Joaquin Phoenix, actor
The actor's career kamikaze move last year -- in which he grew a massive beard, acted out in public and claimed to be retiring from movies -- had many of his fans speculating if it was all just a ploy for some sort of bizarre personal art project. As it turns out, a documentary on Phoenix, titled "I'm Still Here," directed by Casey Affleck, is set to premiere later this year. Will Phoenix be able to out-meta Franco?
Lady Gaga, pop star
It goes without saying that the inescapable pop star is the essence of today's shape-shifting, media-obsessed celebrity-dom. Her calculated provocations are endlessly scrutinized by both TMZ and highbrow cultural critics. Of course, Lady Gaga could not exist without Madonna. Both stars live their careers as though they were texts waiting to be deconstructed by semioticians.
David Lynch, filmmaker
The maker of "Blue Velvet," "Twin Peaks and "Mulholland Dr." appears to have abandoned his film career in favor of all things digital and meditation-related. (He's an avid supporter of the Transcendental Meditation program.) The cult of Lynch is as weird as any of his movies. His ongoing projects -- including his folksy missives via Twitter and his online weather reports -- feel part of a carefully constructed and strangely impenetrable artistic persona.
Bob Dylan, singer-songwriter
The reigning king of self reinvention, Dylan remains as mysterious, enigmatic and essentially unknowable as he did at the beginning of his career. Todd Haynes' 2007 movie "I'm Not There" (whose title perhaps influenced the Phoenix/Affleck documentary) made literal the rock legend's constantly changing public image.
Did we forget anyone? Let us know in the comments section.
-- David Ng
Photo: James Franco at MOCA. Credit: Anne Cusack / Los Angeles Times
RECENT AND RELATED
'General Hospital' airs its MOCA episode with James Franco
MOCA taps L.A. artist Doug Aitken to make its next gala groovy, if not Gaga









Is this the best the LA Times can do - proffering trite insights under the guise of meaningful reportage? This is more akin to a high school writing assignment, if that. Have you not wasted enough ink - and the public's time - on this elite and inconsequential nonsense? I’d suggest refraining from "cultural" reporting and stick to fires, murders and political malfeasance.
Posted by: Anthony | August 12, 2010 at 04:29 PM
Interesting piece. David Lynch and his peculiarities are now gracefully overshadowed by his huge humanitarian effort to relieve suffering throughout the world and create world peace by means of the David Lynch Foundation. It's mission is to bring The Transcendental Meditation Program to all students/teachers/parents who desire it. My hat is off to him.
Posted by: Sustainable | August 12, 2010 at 08:23 PM
David Lynch is so cooool. Love that hair! and I've tried TM and really like it. My brother has heart problems and I'm trying to convince him to take the TM course.
Posted by: HungaStryk | August 13, 2010 at 09:22 AM
@Anthony: Is that seriously the best satire you could produce? Why even bother?
Posted by: Mike B. | August 13, 2010 at 05:47 PM
Warhol was an artist who was fascinated by celebrity, whereas Franco is a celebrity who appears to be fascinated by art. Enamored by the allure of celebrity, elements in the artworld have been willing to indulge Franco's fancy. To compare the two does a great disservice to Warhol's legacy.
There is a long line of "celebrity" artists such as painter, scholar and diplomat Peter Paul Rubens who was knighted by more than one European kings. Furthermore, celebrity has been the focus of artists long before Warhol got around to it, witness the estimated 400 plus portraits of 18th century actress Sarah Siddons.
Posted by: Elagabalus | August 13, 2010 at 06:14 PM
This article made me giggle. . .James Franco's acting on GH was a disappointment; at first I thought he was pretending to act poorly, making some kind of commentary on the stereotype that soap actors are less-than-talented. But I think I might have been a bit too kind.
Posted by: SweetPea | August 13, 2010 at 07:00 PM
Dennis Hopper.
Posted by: Georgianna de la Torre | August 13, 2010 at 10:03 PM
How could you forget Andy Kaufman?
Posted by: nidoog | August 13, 2010 at 11:40 PM
And, of course, Marlon Brando, who dressed up as an American-Indian maiden "Seischa Lightfeathers" and delivered an hour-long rant at the Oscars ceremony in 1982 in which he refused to accept his Oscar for "Reflection in A Golden Eye" (itself a film about a man who became President even though he was allergic to his own eyeballs) or even show up at the very Oscars ceremony at which he gave the speech!
Posted by: William Budd | August 14, 2010 at 03:04 AM
Very good information, I follow this blog all the time. Even in my office when I need to read something important. I hope you can keep like this way
Posted by: Apollo | August 16, 2010 at 12:45 PM
This article is about as shallow and boring as celebrity culture itself. What a new low for art journalism.
Posted by: Artgurrl | August 29, 2010 at 05:44 PM