« Previous | Culture Monster Home | Next »

Eli Broad's museum gets City Council OK; two more agency approvals needed

August 6, 2010 |  3:35 pm

BroadMuseumSiteLawrenceKHoThe Los Angeles City Council unanimously approved Eli Broad’s downtown museum Friday, a step closer for the estimated $80-million-to-$100-million structure to house 2,000-plus contemporary artworks he and his wife Edythe have collected.

The council’s 14-0 vote certified last month’s vote by commissioners of the Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency, changing the original 2007 development plan for the Grand Avenue Project to add the museum to the front half of a parcel at Grand Avenue and 2nd Street that was to have been for condominium towers.

The Broad Collection, as it is tentatively called, next needs approval from the county Board of Supervisors and the Joint Powers Authority, a panel of local and state officials that oversees the Grand Avenue Project. But Broad’s spokeswoman, Karen Denne, said he still has not ruled out Santa Monica’s competing offer of a rent-free, city-owned site next to the Civic Auditorium.

“He needs to know that the project is possible on Grand Avenue before he decides between Santa Monica and downtown Los Angeles,” she said.

Both deals call for a $200-million endowment Broad will provide to cover the museum’s operating expenses. In Los Angeles, he would provide an additional $22 million to build a 284-space parking garage beneath the museum. Most of the spaces would be for general public use, and the city redevelopment agency, which asked that it be built, would repay him over time and eventually become the garage’s owner.

Though the museum would receive a 99-year lease on its site at $1 per year, Broad has satisfied Supervisor Mike Antonovich’s earlier objections to a rent-free deal by agreeing to pay what a county consultant calculated to be the lease’s market value: $7.7 million, which the redevelopment agency intends to use to help the Grand Avenue Project’s developer, Related Cos., include affordable housing in its planned condo developments.

City officials and other backers hope that the Broad Collection will not only draw visitors downtown but provide a kick-start to the stalled Grand Avenue Project. Amid the economic downturn, Related has been unable to secure the financing to proceed with the rest of the $3 billion in residential, commercial and cultural buildings called for in the plan.

The Grand Avenue Project’s success would help the museum financially. Under a complex agreement with the redevelopment agency, the museum would receive about $10.5 million of the estimated $30 million in required developers’ payments for public art and culture that a $3-billion Grand Avenue project would generate. The money would materialize only as each building goes up and the developer pays the arts fees of 1% of each structure’s design and construction cost.

As it did last month at the meeting of the redevelopment commissioners, Shen Yun Performing Arts briefly presented its counter-proposal for the museum site: a 3,000-seat theater and high-rise residential tower to house students training as performers for its globally touring dance presentations that incorporate traditional Chinese styles and modern stagecraft, while also reflecting political and spiritual tenets of the Falun Gong religious movement that is banned in China.

Shizhong Chen, a spokesman for Shen Yun’s Los Angeles planning group, said after the hearing that it will continue to try to make its case before the Board of Supervisors and the Joint Powers Authority that adding its center to the Grand Avenue Project would be a cultural and economic boon to the city. If it fails to persuade them, he said, “at that point we will evaluate our options. Maybe we’ll deal with other great cities. Los Angeles is not the only great city.”

-- Mike Boehm and David Zahniser

RECENT AND RELATED

EliBroadJeffreyDeitchIrfanKhan  Some fine print in the Broad museum deal

Shen Yun arts group says China pressuring L.A. to thwart its theater bid

Eli Broad museum site gets preliminary city OK, but a rival arts use suddenly emerges

Eli Broad offers $7.7 million for art museum lease, not $1


Photo: Site of the Broad Collection museum. Credit: Lawrence K. Ho/Los Angeles Times



 
Comments () | Archives (3)

The museum will be a much better fit for downtown Los Angeles than Shen Yun’s Falun Gong temple. The city and her people don't need to be supporting a religious organization. And I'd say that for any proposed religious building wanting to use public funds and/or buildings.

Bravo at the successful completion of this first step. Here's hoping the next steps are as successful!

Instead we have a mausoleum for a robber baron? With a terrible collection of absurdist academic nonsense. This is of the people, our city, where are OUR interests? Or is it simply the interests of the council being catered to here, they wont be invited to hoity toity parties anymore, and be able to schmooze with campaign donors.

Isnt there a better use? No more will come here than to MoCA, which is pretty much no one ouside of the special art interests, those looking for career, and not arts purpose. To reveal, evolve, and enrichen our common humanity, the highest common denominator of our species, not this lowest of self interested spoiled rich kid decadence.

More waste, when teh Age of excess has ended. Time to get with it, the later 20th century Salon of the Academies is dead. if it ever lived. Art is out here, not in the narrow confines of the westside and hills, those of metrosexual and self absorbed decay. Where are the needs of us 99+%?

Ignored, as we are peltered with consumer trash and brain washed into being cattle, to feed the robber barons. As this "collection" feeds to their emotional, spiritual, and physical immaturity and selfishness. All "clever" and "smart", "witty" and "intelligent". Childishness dressing up as adulthood.

And thsoe from phidia through Michelangelo to Goya Hokusai and Cezanne, Braque to de Stael through Tamayo and Bearden(Romare) turn in their graves. Gauguin, and van Gogh amazed at their failure. The literary wing of bad art is ascendant, their musical adn poetic in disarray, but will return. It is a long term battle, between mind, body and soul, and self interested career and kowtowing to patrons. Make no mistake, mthere is a war for mans soul, one you long ago denied. Not of demons and angels , but selfishness and selflessness.

I think this is called buying your way to heaven??


Advertisement
Connect

Recommended on Facebook


In Case You Missed It...

Video


Explore the arts: See our interactive venue graphics



Advertisement

Tweets and retweets from L.A. Times staff writers.


Categories


Archives