« Previous | Culture Monster Home | Next »

[Updated] Getty Museum ready to buy J.M.W. Turner masterpiece for $44.9 million -- if Brits won't match the price

July 7, 2010 | 12:59 pm

JMWTurnerModernRomeCampoVaccino

[Story updated at 3:21 p.m.] The J. Paul Getty Museum is poised to pay $44.9 million for this J.M.W. Turner 1839 painting, "Modern Rome -- Campo Vaccino," but don't make plans to see it in Brentwood just yet.

The Getty was the high bidder for the painting Wednesday at an auction at Sotheby's in London. But under British law, artworks of special significance that have been on British soil for more than 50 years can't be sold and exported without a license -- and the deal can be sunk if a British institution, or sometimes an individual, steps up to match what the foreign buyer was willing to pay.

The Getty knows the drill: In 2002, it tried to buy Raphael's "Madonna of the Pinks" from the Duke of Northumberland. The sale was a no-go: The National Gallery in London got the painting instead after coming up with $46.6 million over the ensuing two years to buy the painting in the Getty's stead.

David Bomford, the Getty Museum's acting director, said it bid on the Turner painting knowing it could be balked once more. But for now, there’s the thrill of being very close to completing what he described in a statement as an “acquisition [that] ranks among the greatest in the history of the Getty Museum….Paintings by Turner rarely come to market and the absolutely flawless condition of this one makes it the work against which all other works by Turner will be judged.”

“Turner is quite simply the greatest British painter of the 19th century and occupies a unique and pivotal position in the history of art,” said Scott Schaefer, the Getty’s senior curator of paintings.

J.M.W.TurnerSelfPortrait

“Modern Rome – Campo Vaccino” is a view from above the city from the Capitoline Hill – a view that Emmeline Hallmark, head of Sotheby’s British painting department, said in an interview Wednesday is not unlike the view the Getty itself commands of Los Angeles.

In the foreground, people go about daily life; the ancient Forum and Coliseum are among the ruins pictured in what Sotheby’s catalog described as “a dreamlike vista” encompassing classical antiquity, the Renaissance, and the present in which Turner looked and lived.

Christopher Knight, The Times’ art critic, said Wednesday that there’s a “good reason” the painting had hung on loan for 30 years in the National Galleries of Scotland: “It's a…tour de force, a celebratory elegy. Probably Turner's last work in Rome, it shows the great classical, Renaissance and Baroque powerhouse city melting into a distinctly modern atmosphere of broken color and dazzling light. Looking at it, you know the world going forward will never be the same as it had been for centuries.”

Sotheby’s Hallmark said that bidding for the painting, one of just five by Turner that were privately owned, bounced back and forth “like a pingpong ball” over the course of about 10 minutes, as three telephone bidders dropped out and the auction narrowed to two people in the room. “I’ve never had another experience like it. It was electric,” she said. “Like all the best auctions, it was just thrilling to watch it go up in increments.”

Bidding on behalf of the Getty was a London dealer, Hazlitt, Gooden & Fox, which made the final call at $40 million; a buyer’s premium paid to the auction house brings the total the Getty must pay to $44.9 million.

Sotheby’s said the sale sets a new auction record for a painting by Turner, topping the $35.9 million paid in 2006 for his view of Venice, “Giudecca, La Donna della Salute and San Giorgio.”

The sellers, Britain’s Primrose family, must be delighted: The Getty’s bid for “Modern Rome—Campo Vaccino”  eclipsed the pre-auction estimate of $18 million to $27 million. It had been in the family since 1878, when Archibald Primrose, the 5th Earl of Rosebery, later a British prime minister, bought it at auction with his new wife, Hannah Rothschild. The only previous owner, Hugh Munro, was a close friend and patron of Turner, who bought it after it had hung in Turner’s 1839 exhibition at the Royal Academy of Arts.

Given the high price that “Modern Rome—Campo Vaccino” fetched, Hallmark said, and the “wonderful collection” of Turner paintings already on display in British museums, it seems unlikely that a U.K. competitor will arise to prevent it from ending up at the Getty.

If the export license comes through, it will become the fourth painting by Turner in the Getty’s collection,  joining an action-filled seafaring scene from 1844, “Van Tromp, Going About to Please His Masters, Ships at Sea, Getting a Good Wetting,” and a pair of watercolors, “Conway Castle, North Wales” (about 1800) and “Long Ships Lighthouse, Land’s End” (about 1835).

The Los Angeles County Museum of Art's online collection archive lists a single Turner painting, “Lake of Geneva from Montreux,” painted around 1810.

-- Mike Boehm

Recent and Related

GettyWithGarden Rich, gorgeous, sometimes frustrated

Getty closing in on acquiring last Raphael in private hands

British launch effort to keep Raphael work

Hitch in race for Raphael

London gallery wins Raphael fight

Photos: J.M.W. Turner, "Modern Rome -- Campo Vaccino"; self-portrait of J.M.W. Turner. Credits: Sotheby's ("Modern Rome"); Tate Gallery, London, courtesy of Art Resource, New York (Turner self-portrait).

 
Comments () | Archives (8)

It's great that the Getty finally has the guts to go for top-level masterworks again. Hopefully this is the start of a trend. See also: http://theartoflaw.blogspot.com/2010/07/getty-center-finally-puts-its-money.html

I grew up with this painting in Edinburgh as an art-loving child and it was my absolute favorite in the NGS. I was appalled when I saw it was up for sale, but I am delighted that the Getty has bought it. A whole new audience will be able to enjoy this amazing masterpiece. I am British but a US permanent resident and totally oppose the UK's policy of stopping export of so-called "national treasures". Get over the small island mentality and recognize that this is a work of world importance. The Getty is a perfect home and the citizens of LA, the USA, and the world deserve to enjoy Turner's painting.

nice, but I like his loose stuff.

This would be a wonderful addition to the Getty's collection, and like TheARTofLaw said, I hope this is the beginning of a new trend for the institution. I hope it all works out!

I hope we get it, the Getty is mostly a historical museum, it needs art of vitality to come back again and again. It has that in the room with the huge Ensor and others, love the Munch. The Gauguins are great, but always sit before the Cezanne portrait and study how it was built, amazing, so much of the visual languages that came later he discovered, and created. If they get it i hope they dont stick it in some period room, but keep the creative art together, move an Impressionist piece or two to make room, most are just decoration, except for Monet, and a few Renoirs, Degas not an impressionist at all.

Let's just hope the Getty doesn't tamper with "the absolutely flawless condition" of this masterpiece by tickling it up with a welcome restoration.

I´m an enthusiasta of the arts, under all its aspects, far from origins or countries. But, as had said Salvador Dali, "Lo peor pintor del mundo, bajo todos los puntos de vista, sin cualquiera hesitación o duda, llámase Turner."

Laudario, Salvador Dali ain't one to talk...


Advertisement
Connect

Recommended on Facebook


In Case You Missed It...

Video


Explore the arts: See our interactive venue graphics



Advertisement

Tweets and retweets from L.A. Times staff writers.


Categories


Archives
 



In Case You Missed It...