« Previous | Culture Monster Home | Next »

Art review: LaDuke at Angles Gallery

January 24, 2010 |  1:30 pm

400.A Gothic Plot_Text In a 1506 drawing made as a study for an altarpiece in Venice, German artist Albrecht Durer placed the dark pupil of an angel's right eye smack in the compositional center of the sheet. The eye of a mystical, mythological creature is the visual and conceptual pivot around which everything else turns, and it corresponds with the human instrument of visual perception.

Tom LaDuke is up to something similar in "A Gothic Plot," one of seven paintings and five sculptures, all recent, in a terrific show that inaugurates Angles Gallery's new home. (It's in the space vacated last fall when Blum and Poe Gallery moved across the street.) An orange disk with a glowing yellowish pin-spot at the center peers out from a gray gloom, between thickly painted tree branches. Slowly a second eye and a black beak come into view, suggesting the fragmentary features of an owl.

In fact it's an image borrowed from "Blade Runner," the 1982 cult-classic film loosely based on Philip K. Dick's science fiction novel "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?" The branches, plus a thick slather of white oil paint at the lower left and other splotchy shapes, come from an 1818 Caspar David Friedrich painting– a strange wedding picture in which the happy couple faces the transience of life in the form of a deep abyss plunging between chalky cliffs that overlook the sea.

The background for LaDuke's painting is a gray-toned studio interior, where a table holds a rudimentary still life. A dark, photographically painted tree branch in the still life rises up into the colorful, thickly painted branches that lie on the surface of the canvas.

400.AutoDestruct All of LaDuke's paintings are similarly layered, shifting between abstraction and representation and with bits of suggestive visual information that don't coalesce. In one, a precarious stack of cardboard boxes is interrupted by elements of Jan van Eyck's 1434 "Arnolfini Wedding Portrait," in which the painter acted as a literal witness to the marital union. In another, a pack of hunters and their dogs from a wintry picture by Pieter Brueghel the Elder seems to descend onto Isabella Rossellini's luminous face in a still from the 1986 movie "Blue Velvet."

In all of these, a sinister (or at the very least melancholic) world lies just beneath the surface of perception. Light –whether directly experienced, reflected, remembered or depicted – is critical. Taking a page from Gerhard Richter, albeit in his own distinctive way, LaDuke exploits a painting's capacity for exposing handmade deceptions – a useful tool in a culture awash in the slippery photographic phantoms of reproduction.

One of the nicest touches in these large-scale paintings is the little cliffs of oil paint that hang precariously off the edges of the canvas. LaDuke emphasizes materiality, even when his own deft handling suppresses the paintbrush's tracks. No wonder he's a painter who also makes sculpture.

LaDuke's best sculptures also reverberate between perceptual and material, as in a fragile veil suspended inside a plexiglass box. Made from eyelashes, bits of eyebrow and other short strands of body hair, it re-creates the network of surface cracks in a Northern Renaissance portrait painting.

The most arresting sculpture is a nominal "body bag"– the ordinary black, polyurethane sack you might get at a hardware store. LaDuke's crumpled version was cast from an actual bag using an unlikely mixture of glue and graphite (you can still smell the materials). Horizontal and balanced precariously at one end, as if a piece of refuse blowing in the wind, the bag is carefully adorned with a painted logo for recycling, plus a date that corresponds to the artist's birth.

Peer inside the bag. At the far end, where the subtle contour of a phallus can be made out, tiny pinholes suggest a constellation of stars twinkling in a night sky. LaDuke is a latter-day Romantic, in full revolt against digital-age norms.

– Christopher Knight

Angles Gallery, 2754 S. La Cienega Blvd., Culver City, (310) 396-5019, through Feb. 20. Closed Sunday and Monday. www.anglesgallery.com

Image: A Gothic Plot (top) and Auto Destruct. Courtesy of Angles Gallery.

Comments () | Archives (4)

Oh joy! so many clever appropriations for a writer to ruminate about! So many images to let the mind wander into the art textbooks of academic upbringing and bad movies to demonstrate ones own incredible intelligence and deep knowledge of WeHos all encompassing language of mankinds wisdom! Frosted film stills, disjointed images, smearings and doodads layered like MandM's on a cookie! Lets party!How relevant to the artscene's desires to be Seen as witty, and self infatuated! Soooooo clever! Daddy, I want one!

art collegia delenda est

I can’t muster the spark of distain to lambaste this junky junk. It’s not worth time to rip on it or the match to burn it.

"In one, a precarious stack of cardboard boxes is interrupted by elements of Jan van Eyck's 1434 "Arnolfini Wedding Portrait," in which the painter acted as a literal witness to the marital union."

Did van Eyck act as a "literal witness" to the marital union? I thought that the "Arnolfini Wedding Portrait" was the artist's way of representing his own abstract idea of "traditional" marriage. Wasn't he being a symbolic (if that's the right word) witness and not a literal one? He may have been present at the couple's wedding ceremony, but I doubt he followed them into the bridal chamber.

I thought his painting was intended to be a symbolic (abstraction?) of what he saw as the fullness of the marriage union--the ceremony itself (exchange of ring and vows), the bedroom (sexual intercourse), and the pregnant woman (fertility).

As for the LaDuke painting, it looks like he spends too much time at Hooters. I'm sorry, but I just don't "get" his painting or this review. Mr. Knight, you lost me at "body bag."

This is Christopher Knight, replying to Cate. Yes, the "Arnolfini Wedding Portrait" is filled with disguised symbolism. But it is also widely thought to have functioned as a pictorial marriage certificate of sorts. Two persons, one of them the artist, are seen reflected in the mirror between husband and wife, where they assume the role of witnesses to the ceremony. And the mirror is just beneath the decoratively elaborate script "Johannes de eyck fuit hic"--Jan van Eyck was here.


Recommended on Facebook

In Case You Missed It...


Explore the arts: See our interactive venue graphics


Tweets and retweets from L.A. Times staff writers.