« Previous | Culture Monster Home | Next »

What really happened with Broadway's 'Brighton Beach Memoirs'

November 1, 2009 |  5:45 pm

Brighton1 The ba-dum-bum exchange could have been written by Neil Simon. All that was missing was the rimshot:

Two women of a certain age at intermission.

First Woman: “The other thing he directed was quite good, this is just boring.”

Second Woman: “I fell asleep.”

First Woman: “Ditto,” as she tosses her Playbill into the trash.

The two walk out into the rainy night.

This scene, which took place Saturday Night at the Nederlander Theatre, sums up the conventional wisdom regarding why Neil Simon’s “Brighton Beach Memoirs” closed the next day — after only nine performances.  The audience wasn’t building.  Even the older crowd was staying away — and those that did come were turned off by director David Cromer’s staging and not recommending the show to their friends.

But at the final evening performance of “Brighton Beach Memoirs,” the scenes on stage told a

different story. The reason this revival of Simon’s autobiographical play about growing up in the 1930s flopped had little to do with quality.  Sure, Simon’s old-fashioned domestic comedy is not for everyone, but Cromer’s staging and the actors — who reportedly clashed with the director in previews — were not to blame.  The direction and performances was first-rate — as evidenced in mostly positive but not stellar reviews — and in another scene in the same lobby, a few minutes later:

Two other women of a certain age at intermission:

Third Woman: “It’s a delightful show.”

Fourth Woman: “Isn’t it just wonderful?”

The two women return to their seats for Act 2.

The reason “Brighton Beach Memoirs” closed early and “Broadway Bound” was aborted in previews was, not surprisingly, all about money.  As dated as Neil Simon’s plays are -- and let’s face it,  they were almost dated back when they were written, though it didn’t stop them from being hits -- what was even more dated was the producer’s business plan.

Everyone knows that the old days of premiering a play on Broadway without a big star are over. Neil Simon used to be a star. He had the kind of name recognition to alone spur tickets sales — but those days are long gone.  (Simon learned this in the 1990s and then started workshopping his plays here at the Mark Taper Forum before their Broadway runs.)  Any straight play that comes to Broadway today and expects to sell most of its tickets has to have big stars (see “A Steady Rain”), be a proven commodity elsewhere (see “God of Carnage”) or be produced through a nonprofit venture (see “The Royal Family”). The stakes are just too high.

The idea of doing these Simon comedies in rep was a good one in theory, but it needed to be bigger.  “Brighton Beach Memoirs” is a solid, American play, but it’s not a classic.  The actors were all first rate, yet their names (and their roles) don’t command attention.  The producers of “The Neil Simon Plays” (as the two-play series was billed) didn’t team with a nonprofit, nor did they did package the material properly. Why open the plays so far apart? Why two plays instead of adding “Biloxi Blues” and making it a full trilogy?  The success (and problems) of “The Norman Conquest” trilogy last season would seem to have made it clear how one could make a venture like “The Neil Simon Plays” work: If you’re trying to sell old material with no stars, make it an event. 

Perhaps the producers were hoping for David Cromer to provide the “event.”  Cromer’s Off-Broadway “Our Town” has proved itself to be “must-see” theater, but then it was tested elsewhere on the cheap, and its bare-bones style gives it novelty.  Even if you’ve seen it before, experiencing Cromer’s “Our Town” is like seeing a new play; Cromer’s “Brighton,” on the other hand, looked like countless other old plays -- and many New York theatergoers still remember the original.  “Brighton” is simply not as timeless or universal as “Our Town,” so short of setting it on a bare stage or using an all-Vietnamese cast, there was little for Cromer to do to make it stand out.

What he did do was direct it in a straightforward, insightful way.  Besides emphasizing a connection to “Our Town” — on the curtain he shows the pencil scrawl of Eugene’s notebook, highlighting his Wilder-esque line about living in “Brighton Beach, County of Kings, City of New York, Empire State”— Cromer avoided putting a personal stamp on the show and just focused on mood.  The acting was subtle (unlike recent revivals of “The Odd Couple” and “Barefoot in the Park”), yet the jokes all earned laughs, and in a few moments Simon’s writing almost felt like Arthur Miller (almost).  At the end of the penultimate performance, the audience gave the cast a standing ovation.  Some of this was no doubt sympathy, but it was not unearned.

“Brighton Beach Memoirs” was a strong if not scintillating production.  With time (and a better business plan) it could have found an audience — but one week after opening, the prognosis didn’t look good.  All of this gave an added meaning to the rhetorical question the father character (movingly played by Dennis Boutsikaris) asks his son, who’s about to be fired: “You did the right thing, you showed you have principles … but can this family afford principles right now?”

-- James C. Taylor


 
Comments () | Archives (7)

James Taylor wrote, "Why two plays instead of adding 'Biloxi Blues' and making it a full trilogy?"

I think the very simple reason is that it would have been way too expensive. The first and third plays share the same basic set (with the addition of ice and snow for "Broadway Bound") and a number of characters. But "Biloxi Blues" requires a completely different set. (In fact, worse still, it has a couple of sets.) Not only would that make initial capitalization more expensive, it would mean a lot more stagehands to pay each week.

And except for Eugene, it's a whole other cast of characters. Seven other characters, which means at least ten more actors (including additional understudies).

"The Norman Conquests," in contrast, had the same six characters for all of the plays. It did have a separate set for each play, which may be one reason why it lost money. But even there, because of the nature of the playing space, the sets were much simpler. Dismantling the Brighton Beach home set and putting up the Biloxi Blues sets a few times a week would have added a lot to the weekly running costs.

Excellent article, though James failed to mention AUGUST OSAGE COUNTY which was didn't have stars and was a huge hit in NYC and on tour. You could argue that like GOD OF CARNAGE there was some buzz for OSAGE out of town, but ultimately these two shows are the product of must see buzz generated in town by reviews and word of mouth.

I saw the play Saturday and loved it! I believe it would have been a success had the producers and their marketing would have been better! Bravo to the Cast!
I would have seen it again!

I'd love from someone in the press to interview the cast to find out WHAT REALLY HAPPENED.

The truth of the relationship between the director (his shocking self-serving comments to the press as opposed to taking responsibility smack of a "running for the hills" sensibility) and the cast (first-rate and, in some cases brilliant) , the monstrously bungled ad campaign (perhaps the 'squarest' logo to hit Broadway in years) , and the idiotic miscalculation to NOT open the two plays together on the same day to make the whole thing an event, would be very interesting from the Cast's perspective.

And all of this should be laid squarely at the feet of Manny Azenberg. This production was wonderful and would have found an audience. Shame on him.

I'll add to EC's "shame on" [all] who let this beautiful work fall through the cracks.

The show was deeply moving and was such a relevant story (after all of these years). Many thanks to the cast for their devoted performances. With special nods to Jessica Hecht for her brilliant characterization and commitment and to Laurie Metcalfe for her grounded performance.

So the show still had a few kinks to work out. (speaking from when I saw the show in previews); but I was so excited to see Broadway Bound.

Big names can add a lot to the theatre, but why, Why, WHY must it [carry] the theatre. I say a bigger "SHAME-ON-YOU" to theatre goers for letting this sort of thing happen.

All four of the adult actors in the two plays-- Laurie Metcalf, Dennis Boutsikaris, Jessica Hecht and Allan Miller (who wasn't seen as his character is only in the second play, Broadway Bound, that never even previewed)-- live and work here in LA. Maybe we'll get lucky and the plays will be done here-- in rep from the beginning.

So sad this closed so fast on Broadway!! I was so looking forward to seeing it and so upset to know I wasn't going to get the chance! Ready to get my tickets and found out it already had closed! Why? What a shame! Laurie Metcalf always gives such a strong performance and I love to see her work and the show never got a chance. What a shame!


Advertisement
Connect

Recommended on Facebook


In Case You Missed It...

Video


Explore the arts: See our interactive venue graphics



Advertisement

Tweets and retweets from L.A. Times staff writers.


Categories


Archives