« Previous | Culture Monster Home | Next »

Shepard Fairey's lawyers say they have not yet withdrawn from AP case

October 19, 2009 |  1:00 pm


Lawyers representing artist Shepard Fairey in his fair use battle against the Associated Press said in a statement that they have not yet quit the case in the wake of the artist's admission to wrongdoings, contrary to published reports.

But they have stated to various parties their intention to withdraw from the legal proceedings at an undetermined date in the future.

Anthony Falzone, who is one of Fairey's attorneys, said that he has "not withdrawn as counsel for Shepard Fairey, and none of his other lawyers have, either."

He added that "we have expressed our intention to do so at the appropriate time."

A spokesman for Fairey said today that there may be a point when the artist's lawyers will have to drop out of the case. "There's a strong possibility that they will, but then again that may not happen. Nothing's been decided yet," the spokesman said.

Reports last week in the media, including at least one published by the Associated Press, said that the artist's attorneys have withdrawn.

A spokesman for the Associated Press said today that there were "numerous versions and updates" to the breaking news over the weekend and that he was not sure if the Associated Press had run a clarification or correction.

Late Friday, Fairey admitted to wrongdoings in the AP case. He said in a statement that he had deleted  files and submitted false images in an attempt to conceal the fact that he had indeed used a certain AP image for his "HOPE" poster of Barack Obama.

In his statement, the artist said he was sorry for his actions but that the fair use issue at the center of the legal dispute remains unchanged.

Falzone, Fairey's attorney, said there "are lots of reasons lawyers may not be able to continue a representation, but in this case the underlying merits have nothing to do with that. We believe as strongly as ever in the fair use and free expression issues at the center of this case, and believe Shepard will prevail on those issues.  We hope this unfortunate situation does not obscure those issues."

-- David Ng

Photo: Shepard Fairey. Credit: Peter Foley / EPA

Comments () | Archives (2)

Poor slob, if he knew how to draw none of this would have happened.

Breaking it down...This is not a political story, it's about the house of plagiarism of that is the corporate art world of the last 50 years. Plagiarism is an accepted and encouraged form of art to focus of the concept or idea rather than the execution of skill to create something original. The conceptual artist gets to skip years of hard work in learning to draw and go straight empty sensationalism and thievery. What incomprehensible for the average person to understand is if Fairey could draw he would not be a "good" artist in the eyes of the art elite. Most popular and accepted modern artists appropriate images (steal) gather objects (hoard) and shuffle them into their "own" art. If SF could draw in an original way by just referring to a group of photos rather than trace one specifically, none of this would have happened. However, to be fair to him, he cannot do that and be an artist with a voice in the art world. With skill he wouldn't be accepted into the art world, that would make him just a trite "illustrator", poison in the eyes are the art elite. It's the society of nothing art-encouraging artist's to be phony anarchists and rule shrugers to tear down or comment on society rather that to do something original. It’s all so frustratingly inexplicable, but that is why the art reviewer relates to the nothing artist, they can't do anything but comment either.


Recommended on Facebook

In Case You Missed It...


Explore the arts: See our interactive venue graphics


Tweets and retweets from L.A. Times staff writers.