« Previous | Culture Monster Home | Next »

The hells of acting in film and on the stage

May 24, 2009 |  6:15 am

Julia Stiles and Bill Pullman 

During a recent joint interview, Julia Stiles and Bill Pullman extolled the particular challenges and joys of trodding the boards as they prepared for their upcoming stint in David Mamet's “Oleanna” at the Mark Taper Forum next month.

Both actors move easily between film and theater: in movies, she's known best for the “Bourne” series and he for playing the president of the United States in “Independence Day.” That doesn't mean, however, that the actors necessarily prefer one discipline over the other.

 “Yeah, film and theater have their own special heaven and hells,"  joked Pullman, as Stiles murmured her assent. When asked to define her take on the differences, Stiles said she's in theatrical heaven when a total lack of self-consciousness takes over for the stage role. “You get so wrapped up in the experience for those two hours and, unfortunately, that doesn't happen with movies that much,” she said.

On the other hand, she added, “You can work on a play that isn't so rich and you have to do that over and over and over again. And in a movie, there can be that moment on the set where everybody comes together and it's this group of people working together for that same vision."

Pullman quoted actor Anthony Hopkins' definition: “Theatrical hell is playing in some very uninspired production of a Shakespearean play at the Old Vic on a rainy Wednesday afternoon.”

He added that “movie hell is where the incompetency is multiplied exponentially, and you're not sure when the movie is going to end, the food is terrible and the hotel has bed bugs.

"But I think the hell of theater can be a whole lot worse than the hell of movies. I've been in hellish movies but theater can be very humbling. Sometimes you go and think, 'This is a great play' and you invest deeply in it, and you run into a glass ceiling and, try as you might, you just can't crack it. And you're reminded of that day after day.”

Stiles agreed. “There's no filter between you and audience in theater and so it feels much riskier. You're not in control. And that can be thrilling — and really scary.”'

For more about Pullman and Stiles, check out Sunday's Arts & Books section or click here.

--Patrick Pacheco

Photo: Julia Stiles and Bill Pullman during a rehearsal break in New York. Credit: Carolyn Cole / Los Angeles Times
 


 
Comments () | Archives (2)

Seeing this production reminded me how Beckett fed into Pinter fed into Mamet!
This play is an atectonic work. It is open to expansive interpretation via talented players. It i quite open ended & archetypal.For me PULLMAN & STILES were better than both the TREAT WILLIAMS & even BLL MACY original. This is because they played the Mamet's theatrical reality & imbued it with their own talent--presence, resonance & craft.
They had acted together before & it shows how important CONTACT is & RELATIONSHIP in acting. I am writing a book on ALBEE. This play demonstrates how Beckett influenced all of these geniuses--ALBEE & PINTER. There are also amidst TENNESEE WILLIAMS' canon Beckett-influenced shorter plays. These later plays of Williams have been drastically misinterpreted. Thank God JOHN LAHR is doing Part 2 of the AUTHORIZED TENNESSEE WILLIAMS BIO. When I spoke to him as he requested my various WILLIAMS abilia I realized how he was the only THEATRE CRITIC/HISTORIAN with the lyrical language & rhapsodic rhythm to write about Williams& approximate it in reportage/response. Dame Edith Sitwell spoke of 'Going to the marrow of the word." This she used to qualify my dear friend/mentor JAMES PURDY's works. PURDY influenced both ALBEE & WILLIAMS. GORE VIDAL had the good sense to have PURDY's woks reissued in attractive paperback. I do wish Bill Pullman would answer my Edward Albee interview request!

It's good to see actors from movies tries to make a big break in theater. I remember Julia Stiles because I've seen the three Bourne movies with Matt Damon. I've also seen the movie Independence day and saw Mr. Pullman there. I like the way Anthony Hopkins differentiate the hell of a movie from the hell of a theater. I agree that theaterical hell is much worse because in theater, there is no cut, your're in front of the audience and must deliver the lines perfectly for two hours. It's true that it's much riskier. Well, best regards for them, hope to see their play soon.

-peter


Advertisement
Connect

Recommended on Facebook


In Case You Missed It...

Video


Explore the arts: See our interactive venue graphics



Advertisement

Tweets and retweets from L.A. Times staff writers.


Categories


Archives