Review: 'San Diego and the Origins of Conceptual Art in California' at Cardwell Jimmerson Contemporary Art
San Diego is a sleeper in the art world, always overshadowed by that rather larger cultural engine 120 miles to the north. If institutional and commercial infrastructure has often been the city’s weakness, its community of artists has consistently been its strength.
Much of the credit goes to UC San Diego, whose visual arts department was founded in the late 1960s as a conceptual enterprise in itself and emerged over subsequent decades as a haven for experimentation, interdisciplinary practice and impassioned irreverence. Unfortunately, a thorough history of the department and its broad impact has not yet been written; a show at Cardwell Jimmerson Contemporary Art serves as a compelling proposal for just such a text.
“San Diego and the Origins of Conceptual Art in California” feels like the outline for an introduction, notes toward a thesis. The show identifies a dozen central players in the evolution of a local scene — not just at UCSD but also elsewhere in San Diego — with international scope.
Eleanor Antin’s brilliant “100 Boots” (1971-73) starts the show off with a bang of humor and pathos. The legendary series of 51 photographic postcards (shot by another participant in the show, Phel Steinmetz) tracks the exploits of a troop of surrogate Everymen, following the empty boots as they seek work and wander the streets, ever in search of a place and some meaning. An excerpted sequence of eight postcards aptly represents the work’s unprepossessing power.
The Southern California strain of Conceptualism tended to be juicier
than its East Coast counterpart — socially engaged but also funny,
intellectual as well as amusing. Antin is a prime example, as is John
Baldessari, who grew up in San Diego and was one of the founding
faculty members at UCSD before heading north to CalArts in 1970. A
pithy little sticker by Baldessari, made in collaboration with George
Nicolaides, hangs in the show, as well as a small abstract painting
from 1966, minor in itself but notable as a survivor of Baldessari’s
publicly announced “cremation” of his own work dating from 1953 through
early 1966.
Baldessari took the so-called de-materialization of the art object to
its fatal extreme in that 1970 bonfire, but others of that time and
place nudged the process along as well. In a recorded 1966 lecture,
Allan Kaprow (at UCSD, 1974-93) issued directives on “How to Make a
Happening.” He starts out by admonishing artists not to make a
painting, not to make poetry and not to write plays, but to make
something new that doesn’t remind you of culture as you know it,
something that arises from the real world and happens in natural time.
David Antin’s talk-poems evolved around the time he directed the university’s art gallery (1968-72) and subsequently taught there; a DVD of one of his 1992 performances skews the show’s chronology a bit but gives a taste of his work’s rich personality. Founding faculty Newton and Helen Mayer Harrison delve into ecological stress points around the world through a combination of handwritten narrative poetry, drawings, maps and photographs, exemplified by their “Book of the Seven Lagoons.”
Wry investigations of conventions of all sorts (aesthetic, cosmetic,
domestic, political) dominated the work of the rest of the artists:
Martha Rosler’s tongue-in-cheek deconstruction of the “North American
Waitress”; Allan Sekula’s self-portrait as three types of artist;
Russell Baldwin’s printing plate, ironically both canceled and
gold-plated; and Steinmetz’s four-part family portrait with spare and
dour captions.
Another highlight from this unwritten chapter of art history is Fred Lonidier’s 1974 “The Double Articulation of Disneyland,” a photo-text installation chronicling a trip several of the artists made to the theme park only to discover its most prevalent theme to be corporate branding. Beneath the plainly stated captions to the pictures runs the text from an academic critique of Disneyland as an ideologically driven model of utopia. Performative and playful, self-referential and slightly subversive, the piece, like the formative moment it hails from, is worth revisiting.
-- Leah Ollman
Cardwell Jimmerson Contemporary Art, 8568 Washington Blvd., Culver City, (310) 815-1100, through April 11. Closed Sundays and Mondays.
Top: Eleanor Antin's "100 Boots Move On" (Sorrento Valley, California. June 24, 1972, 8:50 am); credit: Ronald Feldman Fine Arts, New York. Bottom: Fred Lonidier's Panel No. 11 of 72 from "The Double Articulation of Disneyland" (1974); credit: Cardwell Jimmerson Contemporary Art




Dialogue/Discourse/Research, curated by William Spurlock, was a 1979 exhibition of UC San Diego faculty-artists at the Santa Barbara Museum of Art . A catalog was published.
Posted by: S.J. Erenberg | March 26, 2009 at 11:20 PM
Bet no one went but artiste students and faculty. There is no art without interacting with the world, with nature, That which is strictly of man is but a tiny, weak, and formless thing. Not art at all. Pseudo intellectualism at its most vain, self absorbed and arrogant. True intelligence learns, mutates, grows, develops, bends and twists as reality has it say in what is true and what is but an illusion. Men are fallable, and hopelessly self deluding. Which is how we got into this economic collapse, and the very same forces who patron the contemporary worship of the individual over mankind, nature and god.
How insipidly boring. A man gotta know his limitations, not live in darkened closets of the mind, trapped in games and isolated dreams of grandeur. Weak.
art collegia delenda est
Posted by: Donald Frazell | March 27, 2009 at 01:26 PM