Ousted MOCA leader Jeremy Strick goes to Nasher Sculpture Center in Dallas

 

Jeremy Strick, who led Los Angeles’ Museum of Contemporary Art during a nine-year period of vibrant programming and critical acclaim but who resigned in December amid a financial crisis that threatened the institution’s survival, has been appointed director of the Nasher Sculpture Center in Dallas.

In his new position, beginning March 2, he will take charge of a much younger and smaller institution — a 5-year-old exhibition and education center for modern and contemporary sculpture founded by the late Raymond and Patsy Nasher — but one with a generous endowment and lofty aspirations. Strick, 53, will succeed Steven A. Nash, who left about two years ago to take charge of the Palm Springs Art Museum.

“There is no lack of ambition at the Nasher,” Strick said by phone Friday. “And there’s a real desire to be substantive. It’s a serious group that wants to make an impact on the field and is ready to take the institution to another level. The commitment to quality is evident in the collection, the building and the gardens. Now it’s in a position to add to the collection, develop an ambitious program and think about the position of sculpture in modern and contemporary art.”

David J. Haemisegger, president of the center’s board of trustees, who began talking to Strick about making the move last spring, called him “a great fit and a great catalyst for lots of wonderful things at the Nasher. Not many museums are committed to sculpture. One of the things we are trying to figure out with Jeremy is what we have and how we can liaison with museums throughout the world in an international dialogue. We think he is the one who can help us do that. He has a scholarly approach to things, he has done great exhibitions and he understands our collection.”

Haemisegger also said he was fully aware of MOCA’s problems and had “no reservations” and “no apprehensions” about Strick’s qualifications. “Museums are a combination. It’s the director, the staff, the board, the mission and the finances. It’s all that coming together. With Jeremy, the chemistry was almost automatic.”

At MOCA, Strick directed a high-profile museum of postwar war art, widely regarded as the best of its kind in the country, if not the world. With two downtown showcases, a satellite at the Pacific Design Center, a distinguished collection and a reputation for working closely with artists, the 30-year-old museum has an exhibition program that attracts international attention. But MOCA is also chronically unfunded. Last year its endowment plunged to about $6 million, and its economic outlook was so dire that its leaders considered selling part of the collection and merging with the Los Angeles County Museum of Art.

In late December, when Strick’s resignation was announced, MOCA’s board of trustees accepted a $30-million bailout from philanthropist Eli Broad, rounded up $20 million in promised gifts from the trustees and embarked on a restructure of its management. Charles E. Young, chancellor emeritus of UCLA, was enlisted as a short-term chief executive to help stabilize the museum before recruiting a new director.
In Dallas, Strick will oversee a more tightly focused and enterprise with an endowment that’s expected to be reach about $100 million when the founder’s’ estate is settled.

The Nasher is the fulfillment of a dream of a Dallas couple who built one of the world’s finest collections of modern and contemporary sculpture, including major works by Constantin Brancusi, Alexander Calder, Alberto Giacometti, Richard Serra and James Turrell. The facility opened in 2003 in a 55,000-square-foot building on a 2.4-acre site adjacent to the Dallas Museum of Art in the center of the city’s arts district. Renzo Piano designed the building and collaborated with landscape architect Peter Walker on plans for the 1.4-acre sculpture garden.

Dedicated to “advancing the understanding and appreciation of modern and contemporary sculpture through its collection, exhibition, conservation and education programs,” the Nasher presents rotating exhibitions drawn from its holdings and temporary shows of works from other museums and private collections.

— Suzanne Muchnic

Caption: In December, Jeremy Strick left MOCA, which was facing financial turmoil. Credit: Glenn Koenig / Los Angeles Times

Comments

[cballan]

quoting from the article -'David J. Haemisegger, president of the center’s board of trustees, who began talking to Strick about making the move last spring' -this suggests that Mr Strick knew the end was approaching in that spring, and, is that not six months [and perhaps $250,000 of salary etc before he stepped aside?] I can't help feeling that Mr Strick has nothing but his own agenda, a comfort driven personal, self focused agenda that displays a singular extraordinary, ill-mannered view of the world, after all he did manage to take about $5,000,000 personally out of MOCA [including cheap house loans etc] during his tenure [see guidestar.com for details of any tax exempt 501c3's tax returns]. I would have thought someone with at least a little taste would have taken a bit of time/low key time and perhaps considered the result of his own actions on those around him. [btw I am not a 'disgruntled former associate....'] Clearly Mr Strick is an amazingly unreflective human being. I wish the Nasher well with their choice of director.

[cballan]

and one other thing - This situation [Mr Stricks] is of course not unique - he is just today's wonderfully self-interested example - quite a large part of the art universe seems to me to be unable to see a true 'larger' social mission in the project of art and society- only paying lip service to art education etc- the collision of 'touchy-feely,isnt art wonderful, laissez faire blah', easy employment introductions, easy common goals [spend money at my gallery/'we'll get a foundation to buy this...'] etc, never will go to serve a public good currently lubricated by easy 501c3 cash/tax deductions. A much more rigorous and transparent regime is called for. [and I'm sorry but your writers piece comes across more like a PR blurb of Strick/MOCA history - quote 'At MOCA, Strick directed a high-profile museum of postwar war art, widely regarded as the best of its kind in the country, if not the world' - really? -yes he did direct it but......I can think of a few other joints - don't ever forget these people [JS included] ran the place into the ground

[teenagerobot]

cballan is obviously unacquainted with the way museums try to attract good directors. To move to another city - yes they are offered help with housing, loans etc. and yes running a high-profile museum commands a high salary. Mr. Strick ran an exemplary program at MOCA and has no reason to hide. Why shouldn't he take a job? We all know it is the board who should be ashamed not only for "running the museum into the ground" as you say but also for scapegoating Mr. Strick. Your comments about art education and the "art universe" are plainly stupid and uninformed. Once you, and every other fool who knows nothing about art, artists or museums, shuts up, we'll all be better off. Those who know that artists are workers in this country too and for some reason, perhaps because they have the talent and freedom to create, they anger fools like you. Well go ahead and be jealous - it's obviously all you've got.