Culture Monster

All the Arts, All the Time

« Previous Post | Culture Monster Home | Next Post »

Getty 'Interjects' Freud

January 6, 2009 |  4:30 pm

If you collect contemporary paintings, the J. Paul Getty Museum just might want to show them.

Lucianfreud1_2 At least, that's the odd conclusion drawn from the Getty's puzzling announcement today that it has borrowed for three months Lucian Freud's small 1949-50 "Still Life With Aloe" (right) from local collector Michael Lynton, chairman of Sony Pictures Entertainment, for the third installment of the museum's "Interjections" series. The Freud went on view in the South Pavilion today, juxtaposed with a Jean-Simeon Chardin still life from about 1759 and one by Giovanna Garzoni from the late 1640s. The only thing I can't figure out is, why?

"Interjections" was launched as a series of loan exchanges between the Getty and the Museum of Contemporary Art. The second installment went up in late 2005, when MOCA's 1939 Mondrian abstraction was installed at the Getty next to its 1450-55 "Annunciation" by Dieric Bouts. In exchange, the Getty lent its Caspar David Friedrich to MOCA, where it was installed with a MOCA painting by Scottish artist Christopher Orr.

When sharply selected, pictures from different cultures and different eras are always interesting to compare. And museums perform a real service when they cooperate with such exchanges from their permanent collections. But a painting by a living artist (Freud is 86) owned by a private collector is a different, frankly more speculative matter. It's not as if we were getting any insight into the holdings of local institutions, which is a good reason for "Interjections" to take place.

Beyond random voyeuristic appeal, why, exactly, is the public supposed to care about what's hanging in someone's Westside living room? L.A.'s got lots of art collectors, so by what criteria does the museum choose? And I wonder what the Getty's Chardin and Garzoni would look like flanking, say, Meyer Vaisman's 1987 "Still Life" or Robert Rauschenberg's 1958 "Coca Cola Plan," both owned by MOCA.

It's doubtful the Getty will be sending any paintings over to the Lynton family's house or Sony's Culver City offices, because the reciprocity built into the earlier "Interjections" does not now apply. But maybe they could do it virtually: The Sony Pictures Entertainment Museum does exist online as a cool website.

(You can see the Getty's two still life paintings after the jump.)

--Christopher Knight

Chardin

Jean-Simeon Chardin, "Still Life With Peaches, a Silver Goblet, Grapes and Walnuts"

Giovanna_garzoni_2

Giovanna Garzoni, "Still Life With Bowl of Citrons"

Photos: J. Paul Getty Museum


Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments

If I have time, I will visit there

How slow a news does it gotta be to contrive that showing a good painting in a museum is puzzling?

Knight and his protege, Tyler Green, sure are arrogant -- like any art lovers care about their feelings about deacessioning, collector-owned pieces. The country is founded on insider-trading, corruption and monopolies, and the art world is no different. What does Donald Frizell think?

I was wondering the same thing!



Advertisement


Recent Posts


Categories


Archives