Comments war: UC students and non-UC students discuss the student fee hike
It seems the recent decision by the University of California Board of Regents to increase student fees by 32% has caused not only a "students vs. regents" demonstration at UCLA's campus today, but also a "students vs. non-students" quarrel in our comments sections.
The fee hike that everyone is arguing about (justifiably so) will come in two steps by fall 2010. Basic UC education fees will rise then to about $10,300, plus another $1,000 for campus-based charges and an estimated additional $16,000 for room, board and books.
No wonder there is such a heated comments war in our blogs: With the raise, the cost of a UC education will be triple what it was a decade ago. Compared to other U.S. four-year public colleges, which have raised tuition and fees by an average 6.5% to $7,020 a year, a 32% fee hike is pretty notable.
On the L.A. Now blog, the battle rages on with two parties: non-UC students -- who seem to be a mixture of out-of-college adults, community college students and general California residents -- and current UC students. The former argue that current students are being unreasonably demanding.
Balancing the budget is never easy, is it?
Here is what the non-UC students have had to say so far:
Pablo defends his own interests against the fee hike protestors: Listen up, UC students. I'm about to lose my job and I'm close to losing my house. Do you want me to sell my 10-year old car so that I can pay for your incredibly cheap tuition?
He also said: Who taught these people that they were entitled to free (or unreasonably cheap) stuff in life?
Duken4evr believes UC students should explore other means available to pay for their education: They can always go to community college like the rest of us. Screw those spoiled brat UCLA students. Hit up your rich mommies and daddies for the difference. Cry me a river. What a bunch of useless losers.
SoCalReality presents a parent’s point of view: This state is bankrupt! Your FREE education ended at High School. You want to be treated like an adult, act like one and PAY YOUR OWN WAY. The UC system already subsidizes your education with fees below their cost. What you want is continuing "Student Welfare" on the backs of us Tax Payers; go to a cheaper collage or to a Cal State like my kids. But NO, you want caviar education paid by others. GROW UP!
And Reality takes a stand about the actual educational material: IF UC wants to save some money...get rid of the worthless soft-science degrees such as gender and ethnic studies and make those profesors get real jobs instead of pusing their anti-American rants on the tax payer dime!
Then UC students took a stand (after the jump):






M says: Most people have already said these things, but really, there are so many PRACTICAL problems with this naming scheme.
-This is very confusing to people unfamiliar with the area, unfamiliar with public transportation and tourists from other cities, states and countries. Who expects a train line to have multiple names, one of which only corresponds to a portion of the train line? If people only ride on one short portion of the line or only acknowledge one name and apply it to all parts of the line, people aren't going to be able to communicate with each other to give directions. I can guarantee you that only a small portion of the people that will ever ride the Gold Line are reading this blog.
This is partially the same problem that happens with the Red and Purple line. It wasn't until recently that they were finally distinguished by 2 different colors, but that is still confusing to people, especially when maps aren't clear, they don't know to look at the signs on the side of the trains or when the signs don't say the correct things and because they share many of the same stops and the same stations.
-Even if some people are familiar with both spanish and english, some people are not going to do the translation in their head to realize that la linea de oro is the same thing as the gold line. Again, especially with people from other countries and states this will be a problem.
-2 MTA policies were violated to make this change. Why are these policies in place if they can also be completely ignored?
Joel C says: Are we going to rename the Purple Line 자주색의 because it goes through Koreatown?
We have the Blue Line, the Green Line, the Red Line, the Purple Line...and la Linea de Oro? Anybody can see the problem here.
The biggest problem with this (other than Molina's ego) is the fact that the name is supposed to fit into a system of names, which are based on colors, in English. This is not a preference of English over other languages, but strictly a practical matter of consistency.