Although the news that a woman recently delivered eight babies at the Kaiser Permanente Bellflower Medical Center was surprising enough, a new revelation about the family has our readers taking to the comments boards. The 33-year-old woman, who wishes to remain anonymous, already has six children -- ages 7, 6 , 5, 3 and 2, with the youngest being twins -- and still lives at home with her parents in Whittier, Calif.
It is unclear whether the woman is married, and she has yet to release a statement. However, L.A. Times reporters were able to speak to Angela Suleman, the proud grandmother of 14, who stated that "it's going to be difficult" raising more than twice the number of children in the Brady Bunch. Our readers had no difficulty expressing their opinions about this ever-expanding family.
Allen wrote: Perhaps I'm somewhat ignorant in these matters, but I simply cannot
fathom why a woman who already has six young children would be
undergoing fertility treatments, which, from what I understand, can
greatly increase the liklihood of multiple births. I'm not about to
suggest to anyone how many children are enough, but I just can't
comprehend why a person in her position would be pushing for multiple
additional children.
mariamawit wrote: god bless you & ur baby:s ii wish that was me !
Disgusted in LA wrote: This woman should be sterilized!!! She has no sense of personal
responsibility whatsoever. Who's going to raise all those children?
Who's going to support them? An Iraq contractor? It will fall on the
already burdened taxpayers, including those very people who have
deferred having children because they CAN'T AFFORD ONE CHILD...let
alone FOURTEEN!!!
Dave wrote:
Great! And how much of our tax
dollars her new 8 CHILDREN cost the taxpayers. Mom needs to have her
tubes tied and Dad needs a vasectomy. NOW!
Having FOURTEEN children in this day and time is TOTALLY WRONG AND IRRESPONSIBLE!
Tlcb wrote: I'm sorry,for the way some folks worry about the mighty dollar,and not
the welfare of a human being,if god thought this was wrong he would not
of let it happen.What if she would of had these babies the natural
way,would you be thinking the same way,if anyone wants to have 14
children that seems to me it's there business.I think it's awful the
way people think of money instead of life,I'm sure she know's how she
will take care of these babies,love of a family is priceless.Love one
another bets out the mighty dollar by far!!!
Rob wrote: My wife had fertility treatments. However, our Doctor was ethical, and
told us only 2 or 3 embryos would be implanted. And if all 3 took, we'd
have to go through selective reduction. Since we didn't want to be in
that position, we chose 2 embryos and ONE took. I hope the doctor that
implanted 8 embryos would receive some sort on disciplinary action.
Eight little ones being supported by momma's little heart is insane.
The body isn't made to do that. Two or three babies, sure. I wonder
what was the purpose of implanting EIGHT embryos was? Stupidity or
incompetence, you chose.
Doctors have stated that typically physicians do not implant more than two embryos into a woman younger than 35. Suleman stated that the mother was asked to terminate some of the fetuses, but she "refused to have them killed."
Did the unnamed mother do the right thing? Should the doctors who performed the in-vitro fertilization be investigated? More importantly, how is the family going to decide which kids have to sleep on the top bunk?
-- Michelle Castillo
Photo: Doctors at Kaiser Permanente Medical Center in Bellflower announce the arrival of octuplets born to a woman who has six more children. Credit: Luis Sinco / Los Angeles Times