Proposed $2-million Lakers parade draws controversy
Sunday night's Lakers victory was well received in a city that hasn't had much to celebrate as of late. Even though Game 5 was held in Orlando, millions of Lakers fans gathered at homes and bars to watch the game unfold on television. After the buzzer sounded, crowds poured into the streets as Lakers fans from across Los Angeles came together in a grand display of pride and unity that quickly devolved into destructive rioting. The rioting, which caused significant monetary damage, has had quite an effect on the growing debate over Wednesday's proposed $2-million Laker parade. Many feel that the parade -- for which the city would pay half -- is inappropriate at a time when the city is struggling to resolve severe budget shortfalls. Sunday night's rioting only added to the list of concerns held by many Los Angeles residents. "The Lakes deserve every recognition winning the championship. However, in these difficult times for the city and Laker fans, a parade/rally is insensitive and hurtful; I'll send the organization an e-card instead. If the city can afford a parade, the taxpayers of Los Angeles are then obviously being lied to by civic leaders regarding a fiscal crisis," said ELizabeth. "Does that fee include the cost to clean up after all these hoodlums who have already rioted and caused damage throughout the city, including injuries to eight police officers? Huge huge HUGE waste of money," added MB. More after the jump...
After setting a few police cars on fire and doing a bit of looting, the crowds dispersed and the revelers went home.
"What a JOKE! No money for the schools here in California, but the city to pay for $1 million of the parade cost? They just canceled summer school for the kids that really need it, but hey we sure do need a parade. And oh yeah don't give the youths in Los Angeles a chance for an education, so give them another reason to go out in the streets and riot," wrote Diamond. Yet, some readers argued that the Lakers' economic and social contributions far outweighed the parade's $1-million cost to the city. "People forget how much money the Lakers generate in revenue for the city in terms of property tax, sales tax, parking tax, etc... A parade will cost a lot but also generate sales for local shops, vendors, etc... It also builds a feeling of goodwill and community for the entire city. That is priceless," said Terence. "Does anyone know how much the Lakers bring into the city in terms of tax money and such intangibles as civic pride? Why do people always think of money upfront and never realize the true value of an organization like the Lakers to the city of L.A.?" wrote Mo. What do you think? Is a Lakers parade worth the cost? Or would the $1 million be better spent elsewhere?
-- Brendan Bigelow
Top photo: A defaced Lebron James jersey lies among burned debris left in the wake of the unruly mob at Staples Center. Middle photo: Lakers fans rejoice outside Staples Center after the team captured its 15th NBA championship. Photo credits: Jake Stevens/ Los Angeles Times



The Lakers are role models for many kids here in L.A. So why not have a parade to show thier accomplishments. It shows how hard work and dedication pays off.
Posted by: CORONA24 | June 15, 2009 at 07:43 PM
A Laker's victory parade is great idea. Let's reward all the idiots who damaged city property and harmed our police with a parade the city can't afford in the first place. Who is making these decisions anyway? Unbelievable.
Posted by: Michelle | June 15, 2009 at 07:56 PM
Shouldn't the city be a little more worried about the massive debt california has created... than with a parade?.... Man good thing it will take another 7 years to capture another ring!
Cause hey that's what we need to hell with education and bring on the party!
Posted by: yankeecremoso | June 15, 2009 at 09:34 PM
Thanks so much to Lakers for paying half of $2 mil parade.
Charge admission. Thousands will still go.
Rioting and looting is ruining political backing for parade. Next year maybe we should ready the Coliseum for controlled Finals end celebration. How else can we stop these thugs?
Posted by: lahoopsfan | June 15, 2009 at 09:49 PM
It's a pretty typical fact of life, big business and corporate welfare called subsidies: this time in the form of a nice parade. Sure the Lakers contribute a lot to the city in tax revenue. I am sure they receive extra police and traffic help also.
Let us not forget Jerry Buss was a big contributor to YES on one of the recent props. He wants you to taxed to death but don't put any taxes on his $200 Laker ticks---probably the cheap seats.
Posted by: Darren | June 16, 2009 at 07:43 AM
well even though summer school has been cut off the LAKERS deserve their parade. they been wanting this championship since the beginning of 2003. even though so much money will be wasted it will bring in alot of pride.
GO LAKERS:)
Posted by: Cindy:) | June 16, 2009 at 08:53 AM
R u stupid? Let's take all of the money that we waste on all the already rich people and feed the hungry!!!! If the lakers want a parade why don't they pay foe it?
Posted by: Tina | June 16, 2009 at 05:10 PM
give me a break. These overpayed athletes should pay for it. Let's take some of this needless money and feed the hungry!!!!
Posted by: Tina | June 16, 2009 at 05:14 PM
frivolous spending = debt
this parade seems like an impulse plan, not well thought out beforehand
anyway, this reminds me of Nathanael West's The Day of the Locust, written in the 1930s, where in the end there's a riot.
Posted by: asdf | June 17, 2009 at 07:17 AM
LEHMAN down, GM down, Citi, Chrysler ... Is AMERICA really hurt ?
PONTIAC, BUICK, CHEVROLET... the "American dreamt" brands, the symbol of an era in America.
The wish of many teenagers that then became great personalities around the globe.
But, this was a forecasted end. TOYOTA has been for many years, the real revolution in the american auto industry. Together with NISSAN, both japanese manufacturers, leaded the auto sales market for many years in a row.
Afterwards, came the korean cars... the asian conquer of the american auto corporations.
Is this the sign of an hegemony change ?... Is AMERICA really that hurt ?
Is competitiveness the key crack-down factor for this consequences ?
The US will always mean marketing, show, branding, globality, with its own values and essence. But, is this enough to keep US sovereignity in the planet ??
AMERICA has voted for a change. Barack Obama, the first black president, meant a new change era and a barn of hopes for many americans. But is it enough with a good carisma and beautiful words ??
USA is now playing a tough game. The game of competitiveness, the game of innovation, the new rules of capitalism...
Can AMERICA workers compete with the 24-hour turns of japanese or chinese workers ?
Can AMERICA export more than import ?
Can AMERICA reissue the huge external debt owned by CHINA now ?
Does anyone know that the main owner of the USA is CHINA ?
Yes, the main owners of US debt is CHINA. If CHINA decides to do it, US Dollar can dissapear.
Nowadays, CHINA has lived of US imports. Therefore, CHINA has accumulated vast deposits of T-bonds and US Dollars. This has been the reason for the dollar stability.
Once CHINA develops their internal consumer rates, or begin diversifying their exports, CHINA will be in position to change US dollars for other currencies. Then, US Dollar will be dead.
Is AMERICA ready for this era ?
Does Barack Obama has a real plan to put a brake on this dynamic ?
Huge challenges ahead. But, for sure, the only opportunity for AMERICA is not to lose their essence. The AMERICAN DREAMT must be on, but politicians and decisions makers must also help on this.
One advice for Mr Obama:
Capitalism has not failed, it has been the lack of regulation in the financial markets.
It is very important to keep this clear, because around this point, the US must build their next future generations.
Jose Luis Revilla Escudero
Chairman&CEO
WWShares, Inc
-Global Wealth Management-
www.worldwideshares.blogspot.com
Posted by: JOSE LUIS REVILLA ESCUDERO | June 26, 2009 at 10:35 AM