I received the following email this morning from Victor Franco Jr., a lobbyist in Los Angeles. I gather that his commute on Thursday morning was most unpleasant, with the 405 being closed a spell due to the brush fire in Brentwood.
Here's what Victor had to say. I'll discuss the remedy below.
Steven
If you want to print this, I'm ok with that.
Question for the Bottleneck Blogger:
In viewing the recent fire in the Sepulveda Pass on television early Thursday, you could not avoid seeing the thousands of motorists who were stuck by the massive freeway closure. In SoCal, since we are so reliant on freeways, this happens more times than not -- including the recent "wrong way drivers" on the 118 in Chatsworth during that brush fire.
Mr. Blogger, shouldn't we create a system that alerts driver of impending trouble or large closures? How about an Emergency Broadcast System for drivers? Maybe a radio channel similar to that station at LAX or sporting venues that warns drivers? Maybe we should create a closure "response team" that say 15 miles away from the disaster, they can drop-off changeable message signs or other types of notifications to warn drivers before they enter a traffic emergency zone to take alternate freeway or street routes.
While the detours from the fire could have added possibly an hour or more to many drivers commute, it would be better than sitting in a closure area, being frustrated and angry and taking away from police or CHP resources managing thousands of stuck cars.
This system could even have daily usage on heavy or Sig-alerted freeway incidents.
Lastly, traffic reporters need to be more proactive, not just telling us about an incident, but suggesting alternate routes on their radio and television broadcasts or even the internet if you surf before you leave home.
Our commute hassle should be handled before you turn the car on.
Victor Franco Jr
Traffic-hating Lobbyist
Information is still king.
Victor is absolutely correct that getting good real-time information here is a bear. Motorists, for example, could go on the Caltrans road condition website and type in a road number to see if it's closed, but should you really have to type in several freeways each morning? And, besides, that website often doesn't provide information about accidents.
There are also the real-time traffic maps that can be seen on the Caltrans website, as well as the privately-run Sigalert website. But it's the same problem -- you have to go to the information and glean from it what you need. Wouldn't it be great if the information came to you?
This is where Caltrans and municipal transportation agencies could take a quick lesson from Metrolink, the commuter rail carrier, or the Los Angeles Fire Department, which has a service to automatically call residents to alert them of red flag warnings. A few months back, Metrolink began sending text messages to commuters using Twitter, the popular text messaging service. It's extremely simple (and free) and the messages go straight to your phone. The service allows you to sign up to receive other people's "tweets" -- short messages of 140 characters or less.
On Thursday morning, I turned on my cellphone and found this message from Metrolink:
Metrolink: Inl. Empire-OC Line train 803 delayed 30 min. into San Clem. stn. due to meeting late OC Line train 607
The obvious question here is if Metrolink can do this, why not a giant agency such as Caltrans? What if Victor awoke Thursday to this message:
Caltrans: 405 closed due to brush fire in Brentwood. Avoid at all costs. Alternates: 101 or 5. If possible, delay your morning commute.
Caltrans does offer a text messaging service that provides travel times. But that's different -- you can choose to have the same information that is displayed on its freeway signs sent to your cellphone (for example, a sign on the 101 northbound in the SFV may read minutes to 126...45).
I'll talk to the Caltrans folks and see if this is possible. The agency maintains a 24-7 operations center in the Glendale area -- basically it looks like mission control -- and it seems as if there should be one person available to send text messages, at least about major closures. And there are a lot of transit agencies around the world that send service alerts either via text messages or emails, although the quality of the alert greatly differs.
Any thoughts, readers?
After the jump, you'll find a story I wrote in February about a large experiment in the Bay Area, where researchers are trying to both collect traffic data and distribute traffic alerts via cell phones. It's some very cool stuff and gets back to the main question Victor broaches up above.
-- Steve Hymon