« Road Warrior: Wrong side of the road | Main | 105 West shut down »

Silent on 710 tunnel

710 South Pasadena didn't end up taking a firm stand either for or against the proposed 710 proposal, though some residents are skeptical. The Star-News said the City Council did again say it opposed a surface freeway, which would finally connect the 10 and 210 freeways (and take away many homes):

The city reaffirmed its long-standing opposition to a surface extension of the Long Beach (710) Freeway and tried to clarify its more ambiguous stance on the latest tunnel alternative Tuesday during a special meeting of the City Council. City officials said the meeting was called only to update the public -- along with new council members David Sifuentes and Richard Schneider -- about South Pasadena's existing freeway position. The City Council did not discuss any policy changes. South Pasadena has been fighting efforts by Caltrans and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority to connect the freeway gap between the Los Angeles/Alhambra border and Pasadena since 1964.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/816965/19967500

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Silent on 710 tunnel:

Comments

Ironic how South Pasadenans have no problem driving over homes that were once the more historically important Chavez Ravine, but heaven forbid they should have to do the same.

Traffic in the LA Basin is a mess!

Wasn't South Pasadena sued by Alhambra for blocking the completion of the 710? Whatever happened to that??? And where does eminent domain come in on this... People have lost homes for much less in the past (albeit poor people). Why does South Pasadena get a pass (they have the cash to fight)?

Thirty Years ago there was space in and around the area... The homes in the way could have been physically moved; the ground cut... a tunnel built and the homes returned... And 30 years ago, it would have been cheaper to do it...
Now, with the inflated home prices, it will cost the taxpayers billions to complete... if it ever does... (I bet when home prices drop by 35% they'll wish they would have sold to the state; because the economic impact will move this project forward to bring jobs. You heard it here first! )

Now... If only we could get a Mass Transit system that went somewhere...
Consider this... the current light rail system we have doesn't go any where...at least no where near where people want to go...

There are no stops at Dodger Stadium (yet it goes right by it);
There are no stops at Staples Center (yet it goes near by)...
There are no stops at LAX Airport... (it's near by, but you have to take a shuttle or cab to get to it; and its not very timely)
There are no stops at the Beach or any Universities or colleges that I'm aware of, so; where does the light rail start and stop? Who uses it?

For a person that lives in Pasadena (the end of the Goldline), a trip on from LAX to Pasadena would take longer (with 4 transfers) than sitting in rush hour traffic without use of the carpool lane; other than not having to drive, there's no incentive to use Mass Transit.

And further, there is no reason, in my mind why there should be a fee for Mass Transit. Wow!! You say! Free public transportation. Why do I believe the MTA should be free to use! My answer is simple. Paying for mass transit in Los Angeles County is a tax on the poor and only the poor. If you look at where it does go and who uses it; it's only the poor. The rich are driving themselves or being driven in overpriced smog polluting luxury vehicles. Additionally, it will free up space on the freeway (delaying construction cost), it's greener than thousands of gas guzzling cars/trucks, and if it goes some where, people will use it.

So...
South Pasadena should find a solution they like and offer it to the state...
If they do not do it today, with a plan they like, then they will be forced to when the economy crashes.

The light rail system needs to be redesigned to go where people want to go...And there shouldn't be a fee for citizens using public transportation.

I don't know... but that's my two cents...
Manus Ferrea!

Yep, while they drive their polluting Hummers and other SUVs through our towns. Sounds about right.

Don't worry. South Pasadena residents will speak up the instant it is known that there will be off-ramps that enter their neighborhoods. They will demand that vehicles entering and exiting pass through a smog absorbing, carpeted curtain to keep all that nasty pollution from flowing onto their city streets.

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In






Our Blogger
Steve Hymon is The Times' Road Sage. He covers traffic and transportation in a region united by a confounding network of freeways that frustrate drivers daily. The Bottleneck Blog is Steve's website home, where he breaks transportation news, reports on traffic tie-ups and brings a critical but humorous eye to commuting in Southern California. You can reach Steve at steve.hymon@latimes.com.

All LA Times Blogs

All The Rage
All Things Trojan
Babylon & Beyond
Big Picture
Blue Notes - Dodgers
Booster Shots
Bottleneck
Comments Blog
Countdown to Crawford
Culture Monster
Daily Dish
Daily Mirror
Daily Travel & Deal Blog
Dish Rag
Extended Play
Fabulous Forum
Funny Pages 2.0
Gold Derby
Greenspace
Hero Complex
Homeroom
Homicide Report
Jacket Copy
L.A. Land
L.A. Now
L.A. Unleashed
La Plaza
Lakers
Money & Co.
Movable Buffet
Opinion L.A.
Outposts
Readers' Representative Journal
Show Tracker
Soundboard
Technology
Top of the Ticket
Up to Speed
Varsity Times Insider
Web Scout
What's Bruin
Your Scene Blog