« Smarter by half | Main | Sidewalks of L.A. »

Slowing down in London

20mph_2 Could this work in Southern California? Officials in London have proposed a 20 mph limit on all roads in London, citing concerns about safety:

The Greens propose that 20mph would become the "default" limit on all London roads and councils would have to make a special case to exempt strategic routes such as bus routes and trunk roads. The limit would be enforced by new speed cameras. At the same time, thousands of road humps, pinch-points and chicanes would be removed. Ms Jones said: "Making 20mph the normal speed limit would save lives and money and give a major boost to cyclists, who would feel safer." Roger Geffen of cyclists' organisation CTC, said: "20mph makes sense not just for road safety; it also means cleaner air, less congestion and more people taking up cycling and walking. It would cut costs and bureaucracy enormously."

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/816965/18513106

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Slowing down in London:

Comments

It (once again) is too bad that Los Angeles doesn't have a viable transit alternative to private automobiles. Manhattan is proposing a congestion charge, and I think it has a good chance of being passed into law - mainly because such a charge can hardly be accused of being predatory of the poor, since the poor and working classes use mass transit! Likewise - if it weren't for the fact that everyone who can see over the dashboard either drives or aspires to drive in L.A., we wouldn't be subject to mob rule of the streets - 20mph wouldn't seem so laughable.

I wish I could go that fast on the 405 during rush hour.

Right, other motorists get infuriated if someone is going 35 (or god forbid, 30) in a 35 mph zone. I don't think this is feasible without billions and billions in cameras. Then the freeways would become even more clogged, because surface streets would take even longer.

I realized recently on a bike commute to work that if the current speed limits we have were enforced, we wouldn't have to spend a penny on bicycle lanes and paths. Bicyclists would be adequately safe IF drivers only obeyed the posted speed limits and traffic signals. It's pretty pitiful that as a society no one feels like they have to follow the posted laws. My bike commute is through the Sepulveda Pass and I routinely am passed by cars traveling 50 M.P.H no more than 1 to 2 feet from me. If you think I am exaggerating, I will let you ride along with me some day and find out I'm not. There is no way the drivers of Los Angeles would obey a 20 M.P.H. speed limit. Most of them do that on the way out of their driveways in the mornings.

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In






Our Blogger
Steve Hymon is The Times' Road Sage. He covers traffic and transportation in a region united by a confounding network of freeways that frustrate drivers daily. The Bottleneck Blog is Steve's website home, where he breaks transportation news, reports on traffic tie-ups and brings a critical but humorous eye to commuting in Southern California. You can reach Steve at steve.hymon@latimes.com.

All LA Times Blogs

All The Rage
All Things Trojan
Babylon & Beyond
Big Picture
Bit Player
Blue Notes - Dodgers
Booster Shots
Bottleneck
Comments Blog
Countdown to Crawford
Daily Dish
Daily Mirror
Daily Travel & Deal Blog
Dish Rag
Extended Play
Funny Pages 2.0
Gold Derby
Greenspace
Hero Complex
Homeroom
Homicide Report
Jacket Copy
L.A. Land
L.A. Now
L.A. Unleashed
La Plaza
Lakers
Money & Co.
Movable Buffet
Olympics: Ticket to Beijing
Opinion L.A.
Outposts
Readers' Representative Journal
Show Tracker
Soundboard
Technology
Top of the Ticket
Up to Speed
Varsity Times Insider
Web Scout
What's Bruin
Your Scene Blog