« 60 widening, tightening | Main | Santa Monica's wish list »

High speed run around?

Train3 Times Sacramento columnist George Skelton examines the $40 billion high-speed rail plan for California. He comes away feeling the governor is guilty of some double talk:

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is trying to sidetrack it, offering a medley of rationales for his efforts to again delay a $9.9-billion rail bond proposal slated for the November 2008 ballot. The governor and Legislature already have twice postponed the bond vote — the last time, in 2006, because it would have competed with their $37-billion public works package. One month ago, Schwarzenegger spokesman Adam Mendelsohn told Times reporter Marc Lifsher that the governor and the public still had higher priorities than creating a bullet train. "Right now, the voters are crying for relief from congested freeways," he said. "That's the immediate priority." The spokesman also mentioned the need for building dams and prisons. But the governor soon began spinning his delaying effort another way, contending that the project needed a "comprehensive financing plan" before being submitted to the voters.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c630a53ef00d8354a374653ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference High speed run around?:

Comments

Get real this will never happen like every other mass transit program that has failed in the past. The politicians are so busy spending trillions on Iraq and policing the world this is just a glorified study. Third would contry China now has a maglev train that goes from the airport to downtown Shanghai and here we sit. China spends trillions on state of the art mfg plants, infrastructure, education and we spend trillions on a war going no where. I travel the world and America is truly in decline with the current leadership and I was a Republican.

I find the Governor's position on building a speed bullet train.typical of a buffoon like him,he could care less about easing traffic congestion,after all,he's beholding to the highway and oil interests.Everywhere in the world,where their are hig speed bullet trains.they are quite successful.

I guess it is more important to accommodate criminals and tax paying citizens. Good one Arnold.

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In






Our Blogger
Steve Hymon is The Times' Road Sage. He covers traffic and transportation in a region united by a confounding network of freeways that frustrate drivers daily. The Bottleneck Blog is Steve's website home, where he breaks transportation news, reports on traffic tie-ups and brings a critical but humorous eye to commuting in Southern California. You can reach Steve at steve.hymon@latimes.com.

All LA Times Blogs

All The Rage
American Idol Tracker
Angels Unplugged
Babylon & Beyond
Big Picture
Booster Shots
California Consumer
Comments Blog
Company Town
Culture Monster
Daily Dish
Daily Mirror
Daily Travel & Deal Blog
Dish Rag
Dodger Thoughts
Fabulous Forum
Gold Derby
Greenspace
Hero Complex
Homicide Report
Jacket Copy
L.A. at Home
L.A. Land
L.A. Now
L.A. Unleashed
La Plaza
Lakers
Money & Co.
Movable Buffet
Opinion L.A.
Outposts
Pop & Hiss
Readers' Representative Journal
Show Tracker
Technology
Ticket to Vancouver
Top of the Ticket
Up to Speed
Varsity Times Insider